Do you like this story?
Tweet
I was just thinking today about the strategic, military reasons we have not yet attacked Iran.
Our troops are in place, our forces are ready , so what are we waiting for?
Is Bush going to pass this threat on to the next Prez? I can’t see that happening, but for him to be waiting and waiting on what we all know is an inevitablity at this point, just doesn’t really make sense to me.
But hey, this is coming from a blogger who knows nothing about what’s happening in the White House. There could be tons of possibilities for us waiting.
I would like to get some people’s comments on this.
- Why have we not attacked Iran?
- What strategic implications do you think are holding us back from striking Iran?
We see scores of public threats from Iran, buildup of Carrier groups in the Indian Ocean, and an obvious strike looming, so what’s the deal? Why haven’t we attacked?
If you haven’t commented before, you can register here.
Thank you for your participation.
image via Memri: Al-Sharq Al-Awsat, London, August 31, 2007
Related posts:
