From the WeeklyStandard online,
On Iran, the United States has for more than 4 years followed a failed policy of negotiation, following the lead of our European allies. Those negotiations have gotten Iran 4 years closer to having nuclear weapons, instead of 4 years closer to regime change in Tehran–which ought to have been our policy. Iran’s regime is extremely fragile, and is having a hard time satisfying an overwhelmingly young and ethnically diverse population. With our responsible policy choices limited to regime change and targeted use of force against Iran’s military program, the former would be preferable. Yet the United States has not pursued this effort, and will not use covert means to force a change in Iranian leadership.
When I asked Bolton specifically what he expected the administration to do with regard to Iran in the waning days of the administration, he expressed disappointment that President Bush is now hearing ‘nothing but don’t attack; don’t upset the apple cart.’ Soon he said, President Bush will be told not to strike Iran because of the way it will influence the presidential campaign, and after the election, he will be told to leave the challenge for the next president. Bolton said he is ‘not optimistic.’
Related posts:
- John Bolton: Bush must “rein in” Condi Rice
- Video: John Bolton explains why the world can’t live with a nuclear Iran
- Bolton: Israel may have to take action on Iran
- John Bolton: Obama just put “Israel on the chopping block”
- John Bolton: US should bomb Iranian camps
- John Bolton: Obama the Naive
- John Bolton Speaks
- Giuliani ready to strike Iran, opposes Palestinian state
- Video: John Bolton on Cavuto
- Video: John Bolton endorses McCain, Fred Thompson follows