Iran: How we got here

by Infidelesto on November 21, 2007 · 5 comments

Do you like this story?

iran_nukes.jpg

Here’s a timeline on the events of our dealings with Iran and their unwavering desire to acquire nuclear weapons. Sadly, it seems as if we are not actually going to do anything about it. I guess the world world will have to suffer the consequences in 2009-2010 when Iran starts threatening Israel, threatening America, threatening Europe and threatening the region with their newly aquired and now operational nuclear warheads that they said they’d never build or never pursue.

Here’s the timeline of events leading up to where we are now: via Atlas

  • August 2002: Iranian exiles say that Tehran has built a vast uranium enrichment plant at Natanz and a heavy water plant at Arak without informing the United Nations.
  • December 2002: The existence of sites at Natanz and Arak is confirmed by satellite photographs shown on U.S. television. The United States accuses Tehran of “across-the-board pursuit of weapons of mass destruction.” Iran agrees to inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
  • February 2003: Iranian President Mohammad Khatami reveals that Iran has unearthed uranium deposits and announces plans to develop a nuclear fuel cycle. IAEA Director General Mohammed ElBaradei travels to Iran with a team of inspectors to begin probing Tehran’s nuclear plans.
  • June 2003: ElBaradei accuses Iran of not revealing the extent of its nuclear work and urges leaders to sign up for more intrusive inspections.
  • August 2003: Traces of highly enriched weapons-grade uranium found at Natanz.
  • September 2003: More enriched uranium is discovered, prompting urgent calls for Iran to sign a voluntary protocol formalising a tougher inspection regime.
  • October 2003: After meeting French, German and UK foreign ministers, Tehran agrees to stop producing enriched uranium and formally decides to sign the Additional Protocol, a measure that extends the IAEA’s ability to detect undeclared nuclear activities. No evidence is produced to confirm the end of enrichment.
  • November 2003: ElBaradei says there is “no evidence“ that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons. The United States disagrees.
  • December 2003: Iran signs the Additional Protocol at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna.
  • February 2004: Abdul Qadeer Khan, the godfather of Pakistan’s nuclear bomb, is reported to have sold Iran nuclear weapons technology.
  • February 2004: An IAEA report says Iran experimented with polonium-210, which can be used to trigger the chain reaction in a nuclear bomb. Iran did not explain the experiments. Iran again agrees to suspend enrichment, but again does not do so.
  • March 2004: Iran is urged to reveal its entire nuclear programme to the IAEA by 1 June 2004.
  • June 2004: Tehran is criticised by the IAEA for trying to import magnets for centrifuges and for not offering “full, timely and pro-active“ co-operation with inspectors.
  • September 2004: The IAEA orders Iran to stop preparations for large-scale uranium enrichment. U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell labels Iran a growing danger and calls for the UN Security Council to impose sanctions.
  • November 2004: Iran agrees to halt all enrichment activities during talks with the EU-3 (France, Germany and the United Kingdom), but pledges to resume in the future.
  • January 2005: IAEA inspectors are allowed into the secretive Parchin plant near Tehran.
  • April 2005: Iran announces plans to resume uranium conversion at Isfahan.
  • May 2005: The EU-3 warn that any resumption of conversion would end negotiations linked to trade and economic issues. Iran agrees to wait for detailed proposals from the Europeans at the end of July.
  • August 2005: Hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is installed as Iranian president, as Tehran pledges an “irreversible“ resumption of enrichment. Iran rejects the latest European proposals for resolving the nuclear crisis. Iran appoints a hardline politician, Ali Larijani, to lead the country’s nuclear talks with the EU. Iran resumes sensitive fuel cycle work at its uranium conversion facility near Isfahan.
  • 2 September 2005: IAEA report confirms Iran has resumed uranium conversion at Isfahan. The report says that the nuclear watchdog, “after two and a half years of intensive inspections,” remains unclear on “some important outstanding issues.”
  • 25 September 2005: Tehran rejects the new IAEA report. Iranian Foreign Minister Manuchehr Mottaki says his country remains committed to the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
  • 12 October 2005: The EU issues a statement calling on Iran to continue negotiations with the EU-3.
  • 24 November 2005: A meeting of the IAEA Board of Governors postpones any action on Iran’s nuclear programme. The move is aimed at reopening negotiations on a Russian proposal for a compromise that would allow Iran to enrich uranium, but only in Russia and under strict controls.
  • 25 December 2005: Tehran formally rejects an offer from Moscow to enrich uranium for its nuclear programme in Russia. Iranian officials insist upon Iran’s right to enrich uranium on its own soil.
  • 10 January 2006: Iran removes UN seals at the Natanz enrichment plant and resumes nuclear fuel research.
  • 4 February 2006: The IAEA votes to report Iran to the UN Security Council. Iran ends snap UN nuclear inspections the next day.
  • 14 February 2006: Iran restarts small-scale feeding of uranium gas into centrifuges at Natanz after 2-1/2-year suspension.
  • 5 June 2006: EU foreign policy chief, Secretary-General of the EU Council Javier Solana, delivers a package of incentives from world powers if Iran agrees to halt uranium enrichment.
  • 31 July 2006: The UN Security Council demands that Iran suspend its nuclear activities by August 31.
  • 31 August 2006: The UN Security Council deadline for Iran to halt its work on nuclear fuel passes. IAEA says Tehran has failed to suspend the programme.
  • 25 September 2006: Iranian Foreign Minister Manuchehr Mottaki says nuclear talks with European negotiators are “on track” and a diplomatic solution is possible.
  • 4 October 2006: EU foreign policy chief Solana says four months of intensive talks have brought no agreement on suspension of Iran’s sensitive nuclear activities, and he adds that the dialogue cannot continue indefinitely.
  • 12 November 2006: An Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman says Tehran is pressing ahead with plans to expand its programme to enrich uranium and remains determined to install 3,000 centrifuges by March 2007.
  • 23 December 2006: The 15-member UN Security Council unanimously adopts a binding resolution that calls on Iran to suspend its uranium-enrichment activities and to comply with its IAEA obligations. Resolution 1737 directs all states to prevent the supply or sale to Iran of any materials that could assist its nuclear or ballistic-missile programmes. It also imposes an asset freeze on key companies and individuals named by the UN as contributors to Iran’s nuclear and missile programmes. Iran rejects the move as an “invalid” and “extralegal act” outside the bounds of the UN’s charter.
  • 25 December 2006: President Ahmadinejad responds to UN Security Council Resolution 1737 by saying the sanctions will have “no impact” on Iran’s nuclear programme.
  • 22 January 2007: Foreign Minister Mottaki confirms reports that 38 UN nuclear inspectors have been prohibited from entering the country in a list that was reportedly delivered to the IAEA; the next day, Tehran stresses that cooperation with the IAEA continues, despite the ban. The European Union urges all countries to enforce the recently passed UN sanctions against Iran.
  • 21 February 2007: The UN Security Council’s 60-day deadline ends for Iran to halt uranium enrichment. Iranian parliamentary speaker Gholam Ali Hadad Adel warns that a delay by Russia in completing Iran’s Bushehr nuclear plant would harm bilateral ties. His comments came after Russian nuclear officials’ claim that lagging payments from Tehran could delay start-up of the facility.
  • 24 March 2007: The Security Council unanimously approves a resolution broadening UN sanctions against Iran for its continuing failure to halt uranium enrichment. Iranian officials call the new measures “unnecessary and unjustified.”
  • 9 April 2007: President Ahmadinejad says Iran can produce nuclear fuel on an industrial scale. Ten days later, the IAEA confirms Iran has begun making nuclear fuel in its underground uranium enrichment plant and has started up more than 1,300 centrifuges to enrich uranium.
  • 10 April 2007: Iran’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Mottaki says Iran will not accept any suspension of its uranium-enrichment activities and urges world powers to accept the “new reality” of the Islamic republic’s nuclear programme.
  • 23 May 2007: The IAEA says in a new report, issued to coincide with the expiration of a Security Council deadline for Tehran, that Iran continues to defy UN Security Council demands to halt uranium enrichment and has in fact expanded such work. The report adds that the UN nuclear agency’s ability to monitor nuclear activities in Iran has declined due to lack of access to sites.
  • 21 August 2007: Iran and the IAEA say they agreed to a work plan for answering outstanding questions about Iran’s nuclear programme.
  • 4 October 2007: Diplomats say Iran has installed close to 3,000 centrifuges, enough to start refining usable amounts of nuclear fuel if they work without glitches.
  • 20 October 2007: Saeed Jalili is named to replace Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani, who resigned.
  • 24 October 2007: The United States imposes new sanctions on Iran and accuses the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps of spreading weapons of mass destruction.
  • 2 November 2007: The UN Security Council’s five permanent members (Britain, France, the United States, Russia and China) plus Germany discuss a third round of tougher sanctions.
  • 15 November 2007: In a mixed report the IAEA said Iran’s co-operation on a new work plan to reveal details of its past behaviour had been “reactive rather than proactive”.

Reference:

Related posts:

  1. UN To Impose 'Sanctions' On Iran *UPDATED* (scroll for updates)
  2. Decision time: Iran has crossed the "Red line"
  3. Iran seeks to join UN Security Council
  4. Will the US allow Iran to have breakout capability?
  5. New report calls for troop reduction, hard line stance on Iran
  • hass

    This timeline is ridiculously inaccurate.

    It skips over all the events prior to 2002 – for example in 1970s when the US encourage, supported and participated in Iran’s nuclear program. Or 1983 when Iran openly announced the discovery of uranium deposits. Or 1996 when Iran invited the IAEA inspectors to visit Iran’s uranium mines.

  • http://capribythelake.blogspot.com Carrington

    This is so scary. I am really appreciate for this information. It’s sad but the Bush administeration will be remembered more not for what they DID do in Iraq and on the war on terror, but what they DIDN’T do with Iran.

  • Infidelesto

    @hass – “ridiculously inaccurate”???

    We supported Iran…THE SHAH…before the Islamic fascists under Khomenei retook the country. They were moderate, secular and pro-western. They were favorable to the West and that’s why we supported them. After the Islamofascists took over, they declared war on the United States so if there’s one thing I left out, it’s the fact that we have been at war with them ever since they declared war on the Western world in 1979 when they took 52 Americans hostage.

  • http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com Americaneocon

    That’s a big truck!

    Happy Thanksgiving!

  • Robert B.

    Infidelesto
    November 21st, 2007 | 4:20 pm

    Yes, he did leave out that bit of information. Iran WAS an ally of ours before Jimmah abandoned the Shah. A pity we failed to vote Republican in 1976. The Middle East may have turned out a bit different.