Acclaimed veteran psychiatrist says Liberalism is a mental disorder

by Infidelesto on February 16, 2008 · View Comments

Do you like this story?

I would say it’s more leftism than liberalism. Believe it or not, there are some good liberals out there from the old Pro-American liberal mantra of Kennedy.

It’s jut too bad liberalism has been infected by socialist leftistism and now is called liberalism. via ZIP

World Net Daily

WASHINGTON – Just when liberals thought it was safe to start identifying themselves as such, an acclaimed, veteran psychiatrist is making the case that the ideology motivating them is actually a mental disorder.

“Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded,” says Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new book, “The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness.” “Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave.”

While political activists on the other side of the spectrum have made similar observations, Rossiter boasts professional credentials and a life virtually free of activism and links to “the vast right-wing conspiracy.”

For more than 35 years he has diagnosed and treated more than 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases as a board-certified forensic psychiatrist. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago.

Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by the two major candidates for the Democratic Party presidential nomination can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

  • creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
  • satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;
  • augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
  • rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.

“The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind,” he says. “When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious.”

This post is brought to you by the Science of Identity Foundation

Related posts:

  1. Liberalism And History: 5 Moments That Might Have Changed The World, And 5 That Still Might
  2. Liberalism officially infects 24
  3. Liberal but not a Lunatic – "No Excuse for Terror"
  4. Political blogosphere: Left vs Right
  5. What Kind Of Country Do We Live In Where…
  • Tonto

    Exactly!!!! lawyers also feed this psychosis with their frivolous lawsuits. The broad that sued a fast food place for splilling her coffee and scalding herself….won and got millions! What? No personal responsibility for being a clumsy dumbass? Perish forbid! Always somebody else’s fault. Frickin’ pitiful!

  • mike
  • Kal_El

    The main difference between Conservatives and liberals is that Conservatives
    (TRUE Conservatives, not the asshats infesting DC who abuse the name) THINK
    their way through life, where as liberals like to feel. That is why liberals
    always waste time and resources trying to force social equality on all of
    us, taking from those that produce, and giving to those who do not.

  • mike

    i find just as many conservatives as liberals in my day to day life fall in to the trap of following emotion rather than thinking. that liberals feel more and conservatives think more is a myth from what i've seen. as a matter of fact, the studies i posted show conservatives are slaves to emotion on a greater scale than liberals.

  • Kal_El

    Care to provide those studies, or links where they can be read? I have
    noticed that any time I visit a leftard blog like the Daily Kos or
    Huffington Post, all I see is a bunch of emotional drivel, from people who
    obviously cannot hack it on their own, and want the government to do
    everything for them…

  • mike

    yeah, they're in my first post but apparently it was too much trouble for you to find out what they were when i posted them the first time. i can see i'll get nowhere with you if you aren't willing to read what was posted before replying. what a shame…

  • Kal_El

    Oops! I missed it, as I do not always see each comment. I get them in my
    inbox and reply from there.

    Regarding your posts, you are way off the mark. True Conservatism has
    nothing to do with the right wing. Right wingers are fascists, like the
    Nazi's and the 1930's Italians(think Qadaffi). They are the extreme opposite
    of left wingers, i.e. socialists/communists, like Hugo Chavez, Evo Morales
    and their ilk. True Conservatives hold the ideals of the Founding Fathers in
    the highest esteem. Those values are what have made the United States the
    greatest nation in the history of the world. Calling that a mental disorder
    is akin to responding “No I'm not, you are!” when someone calls you
    something derogatory, despite it possibly being the truth (i.e. liberals
    being mentally deficient).

  • mike

    1- your definition of “true conservatism” is just that, yours. i'm going by the commonly accepted usage as is the researchers of the linked reports.

    2- i agree, many right wingers (conservatives) are fascists just as many left wingers (liberals) are communists.

    3- you rail at conservatives being judged as a group rather than as individuals yet you have done just he same by calling liberals mentally deficient. hypocrite. if all liberals are mentally deficient then please explain why there are more self described liberals with college educations than conservatives. yes, i know, a degree is not an accurate measure of intelligence (hence the phrase “college educated idiot”) but one cannot be, as you say, “mentally deficient” and earn a degree.

    4- to imply liberals do not hold the values and ideals of the constitution in high esteem is a great example of one way, blinders on thinking. both sides of the fence have done much damage to the constitution but you imply only liberals do. the military is and was full of liberals like me. hell, most people i met while stationed at pope afb were socially liberal and financially conservative.

  • hellosnackbar

    Mike if you read the past comments by my esteemed co- commenter
    Storm Rider he defines very succintly what liberals and conservatives are!
    Real conservatives are in fact liberals who are untarnished by the
    PC gobbledeygook of Marxist morons like Herbert Marcuse and other filth of the former Frankfurt school.
    Barry Goldwater,Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher are examples of this type of reality liberal.
    As Storm Rider so frequently tells us the founding fathers got it absolutely right(and I'm not an American).
    After many years of pondering I'm inclined to agree with him; around the100 percentile area.

  • mike

    “Barry Goldwater,Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher are examples of this type of reality liberal.”
    they're liberals? really? and i'm supposed to take your definition of liberal or conservative as truth? as stupid as your statement is i really don't know why i just wasted my time replying to it.

  • hellosnackbar

    They are liberals in the true sense of the word.
    You appear to be a liberal fascist(not an oxymoron).
    Liberalism means the freedom of the individual to lead his life unencumbered by the laws and byelaws promulgated by sociological quasi marxist retards.
    Your breathtaking arrogance is symptomatic of kneejerk
    poltical theorists who feel a pompous duty(based on nonempirical evidence)to prescribe for the rest of us that which you have been TAUGHT by similar fools.
    If you have an education?then read through the turgid
    claptrap of post modernist deconstruction to understand what a gibbering halfwit you actually are.
    If you think about it, you are a FAITH based moron like
    the islamic tits we deride here.
    Look up etymology Mike!!
    It helps one to understand what a correspondent is trying to convey.
    True liberals are in fact conservatives who wish to CONSERVE that which is right and just(within the common law) without any other interfering ideology;
    to tarnish their happiness,.and sense of moral fair play.
    I feel so humbled that you replied to my missive.
    The golden rule Mike;!absorb what it means!

  • mike

    okay, i'll play your etymological game.
    fascist-
    “A form of political behavior marked by obsessive preoccupation with community decline, humiliation or victimhood and by compensatory cults of unity, energy and purity, in which a mass-based party of committed nationalist militants, working in uneasy but effective collaboration with traditional elites, abandons democratic liberties and pursues with redemptive violence and without ethical or legal restraints goals of internal cleansing and external expansion.” [Robert O. Paxton, "The Anatomy of Fascism," 2004]
    A political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
    liberal-
    c.1375, from O.Fr. liberal “befitting free men, noble, generous,” from L. liberalis “noble, generous,” lit. “pertaining to a free man,” from liber “free,” from PIE base *leudheros (cf. Gk. eleutheros “free”), probably originally “belonging to the people” (though the precise semantic development is obscure), from *leudho- “people” (cf. O.C.S. ljudu, Lith. liaudis, O.E. leod, Ger. Leute “nation, people”).
    Not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or traditional forms.
    conservative-
    As a modern political tradition, conservatism traces to Edmund Burke's opposition to the Fr. Revolution (1790), but the word conservative is not found in his writing. It was coined by his Fr. disciples, (e.g. Chateaubriand, who titled his journal defending clerical and political restoration “Le Conservateur”)
    Tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions.
    i see no way liberalism and fascism can be compatible. and conservatism can be construed differently depending on the political system of the nation or state.
    now, as far as your reference to the golden rule, i believe you are the one that needs to ponder it's meaning. you call me a liberal fascist (incompatible), arrogant, one taught by fools, gibbering halfwit and faith based moron. i will hazard a guess that you would be very angry if you were called even just one of these. your misuse and overuse of “big words” only tells me what you really are.

  • hellosnackbar

    I support your quotes on fascism;Iwas using the term liberal fascists in the sense that there is an authoritarian so called liberal dogma prevalent in europe and the USA which seeks to control the people through an unelected bureaucracy.
    (Brussels being the best example)
    These people have the effrontery to call themselves
    liberals when their demonstrable purpose is manage society through ever asphyxiating regulation.
    When I was young and stupid I believed in this form of government'but having had many unnecessary struggles with these apparatchiks
    I wouldn't vote for these “dirigists at the point of a gun!”
    They are self serving, souless and a drain on the GMP.
    Read C Northcott Parkinson's (of Parkinson's law fame) books on the subject.
    These days real liberals have had to change their name to libertarian to distinguish themselves from the hide bound ideologues of
    dirigist Europe.
    They are fascist in every respect except suppression of opposition.(or Stalinist if you will?)
    The current Labour Party in the UK are enablers of this philosophy.
    I believe that referendums as applied in Switzerland are a better model of representative democracy.
    Gordon Browns sneeky ratification of the Lisbon
    treaty was in my view treasonable insofar as it
    ignored an election pledge.
    Now we have a situation where the British people are likely to have no voice in their own destiny.
    Political correctness is not a joke it's a pernocious totalitarian ideology which seeks to
    punish people who voice any opposition to the status quo!
    Enough already!this blog concerns itself with
    the viscissitudes of the death cult.
    And just to refute your accusation that I am guilty of malapropisms and my over use of “big words”I've reread what I've written and see none.
    It's clear that you've been googling like crazy
    in order to apply your peevish diagnosis.
    I'm for small government ,free enterprise and the
    ruthless trimming of the public sector.
    I hate interfering busybodies.
    Now confine yourself to the topic under discussion.

  • mike

    fine, the original topic was liberalism is a mental disorder. i said “possibly, but i doubt it”. i then went on to provide several studies that suggest conservatism is a mental disorder. all i've received since is personal attacks rather than refutation of the links i provided. i'm willing to believe liberalism is a mental disorder but i need more evidence other than one book and one study. i've searched and that is all i can find.

  • hellosnackbar

    I support your quotes on fascism;Iwas using the term liberal fascists in the sense that there is an authoritarian so called liberal dogma prevalent in europe and the USA which seeks to control the people through an unelected bureaucracy.
    (Brussels being the best example)
    These people have the effrontery to call themselves
    liberals when their demonstrable purpose is to manage society through ever asphyxiating regulation.
    When I was young and stupid I believed in this form of governmen,'but having had many unnecessary struggles with these apparatchiks
    I wouldn't vote for these “dirigists at the point of a gun!”
    They are self serving, souless and a drain on the GMP.
    Read C Northcott Parkinson's (of Parkinson's law fame) books on the subject.
    These days real liberals have had to change their name to libertarian to distinguish themselves from the hide bound ideologues of
    dirigist Europe.
    They are fascist in every respect except suppression of opposition.(or Stalinist if you will?)
    The current Labour Party in the UK are enablers of this philosophy.
    I believe that referendums as applied in Switzerland are a better model of representative democracy.
    Gordon Browns sneeky ratification of the Lisbon
    treaty was in my view treasonable insofar as it
    ignored an election pledge.
    Now we have a situation where the British people are likely to have no voice in their own destiny.
    Political correctness is not a joke it's a pernicious totalitarian ideology which seeks to
    punish people who voice any opposition to the status quo!
    Enough already!this blog concerns itself with
    the viscissitudes of the death cult.(aka Islam)
    And just to refute your accusation that I am guilty of malapropisms and my over use of “big words”I've reread what I've written and see none.
    It's clear that you've been googling like crazy
    in order to apply your peevish diagnosis.
    I'm for small government ,free enterprise and the
    ruthless trimming of the public sector.
    I hate interfering busybodies.
    Now confine yourself to the topic under discussion.

  • mike

    fine, the original topic was liberalism is a mental disorder. i said “possibly, but i doubt it”. i then went on to provide several studies that suggest conservatism is a mental disorder. all i've received since is personal attacks rather than refutation of the links i provided. i'm willing to believe liberalism is a mental disorder but i need more evidence other than one book and one study. i've searched and that is all i can find.

  • Anonymous

    Liberal, progressive, lefties, commies, socialists, greenies – whatever the term, are clearly infantile in the worldviews and just as aggressive as any out of control child or pre-teen, and what’s amazing is how they attempt to cloak their infantilism with pseudo sophistication. More and more, we’re not buying it. Perhaps a medication can be developed to counteract this disorder – it used to be cured by parents and schools.

  • mike

    conservatism is the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to change. liberalism, on the other hand, emphasizes individual liberty and protection from arbitrary authority.

    seems to me that both of these descriptions can be interpreted as infantile. children don’t like change (conservatism) and children also don’t want authority too strict or arbitrary (liberalism).

    the sooner americans wake up and see these squabbles as being petty the sooner we can work towards compromise. both sides are acting so childish right now no one is willing to compromise. it’s really all quite pathetic.

blog comments powered by Disqus