NY Times: In defense of Islamic Law

by Infidelesto on March 16, 2008 · Comments

This is totally reprehensible and shows how far left the morons at the Times have gone.  The disgusting alliance between Islam and the left has created a two-headed monster.

This writer should be fired…period.

NY Times – Why Shariah by Noah Feldman

In some sense, the outrage about according a degree of official status to Shariah in a Western country should come as no surprise. No legal system has ever had worse press. To many, the word “Shariah” conjures horrors of hands cut off, adulterers stoned and women oppressed. By contrast, who today remembers that the much-loved English common law called for execution as punishment for hundreds of crimes, including theft of any object worth five shillings or more? How many know that until the 18th century, the laws of most European countries authorized torture as an official component of the criminal-justice system? As for sexism, the common law long denied married women any property rights or indeed legal personality apart from their husbands. When the British applied their law to Muslims in place of Shariah, as they did in some colonies, the result was to strip married women of the property that Islamic law had always granted them — hardly progress toward equality of the sexes.

In fact, for most of its history, Islamic law offered the most liberal and humane legal principles available anywhere in the world. Today, when we invoke the harsh punishments prescribed by Shariah for a handful of offenses, we rarely acknowledge the high standards of proof necessary for their implementation. Before an adultery conviction can typically be obtained, for example, the accused must confess four times or four adult male witnesses of good character must testify that they directly observed the sex act. The extremes of our own legal system — like life sentences for relatively minor drug crimes, in some cases — are routinely ignored. We neglect to mention the recent vintage of our tentative improvements in family law. It sometimes seems as if we need Shariah as Westerners have long needed Islam: as a canvas on which to project our ideas of the horrible, and as a foil to make us look good.

hattip: ZIP

Related posts:

  1. La Times: Islamic Law already recognizd in British courts
  2. Islamic Justice: 16-Year-Old Girl Lashed 101 Times For Conceiving After Rape
  3. Islamic sharia courts in Britain are now ‘legally binding’
  4. Palestinians in UK seek arrest warrant for visiting Israeli Defense Minister
  5. NY Times: Aiding the enemy
  6. NY Times: “Islam’s silent moderates” by Ayaan Hirsi Ali
  7. Islamic Honor violence rampant in Britain
  8. Poll: Majority of Indonesians support establishing Islamic law
  9. Islamic presentation angers Texas parents
  10. Malaysian woman faces flogging for drinking a beer
Want automatic updates?
4 choices: Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or get daily email updates
  • Rudy
    Funny, he doesn't mention that people in Iran are routinely hanged on SUSPICION of homosexuality, or the people in any muslim country that are stoned on suspicion of adultery. Not to mention the total lack of free speech, in that fatwas (DEATH edicts) are issued for merely speaking out against the ruling despot. Or how about the innocent teenagers like Sarah and Amina Said who were killed by their father, in accordance with Shariah (they brought dishonor to the family for dating westerners and not wearing the ninja hoods muslimahs are required to wear) Law. Then again, it is the New Pork Slimes: All The News That's Fit To Be Fabricated. I love how those leftie morons try to find moral equivalence with things done hundreds of years ago, versus what islam has done to this day, for the last 1400 years.
  • Storm-Rider
    Neither English common law, nor the laws of the European Union, nor the legal proclamations of the United Nations are the laws of the United States. Our Declaration of Independence and Constitution recognize no higher authority except that of the Creator.
  • Robert B.
    Since I have lived and worked a cumulative seven plus years in several muslim controlled countries, I feel I speak fairly when I say that this form of law (sharia) is somewhat outdated. To the tune of a dozen centuries. To justify barbarism currently practiced in muslim countries "because Christian countries did it long ago," is like encouraging a teenager to expirement with sex and drugs because everyone did it in the sixties.

    There is no logical justification for the western world to embrace, let alone allow, a barbaric culture to impose its laws upon us.
  • Is this guy on crack? Judaism and Christianity (am neither) are summed up by teh Golden Rule, basically. Islamic law is pure repression.
  • tyree
    This analysis is as deep as the "everybody is doing it" defense every parent hears from their 12 year old. The N.Y. Times has no credibility.
blog comments powered by Disqus