Comments on: Video: Obama race speech and reactions

By: Tyrone

Tyrone — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 04:14:44 +0000

I didn’t know America was so bad until I listened to Obama.

I like all black people and I think they like me, Obama seems to bring it up a lot and he seems to have a long string of radical friends.

Its too bad his mom said racist things.

By: Tyrone

Tyrone — Sun, 31 Aug 2008 04:05:28 +0000

Can Obama point to one time he stuck up for America

Obama is an empty suit, he and Biden are smooth talkers.

By: Raging Leftist Blogger attacks IAC | Infidels Are Cool

Raging Leftist Blogger attacks IAC | Infidels Are Cool — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:20:33 +0000

[...] Philadelphia. Some idiot named “Infidels Are Cool” has done us all the inestimable service of posting the transcript link, the speech video and a roundup of top Rightie crypto-racists (and YES, I’m playing the “race” card, because that’s been the whole point of this clueless [...]

By: Catherine

Catherine — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:19:48 +0000

Obama has no contol over the words or thoughts of his pastor No more then anyone of us who attend church have over ours. To judge Obama based on the actions or words of Wright is just plain ignorant. Come on people think the media is just trying to make a dime by blowing up these controversal words. Instead on dwelling on the negative try focusing on the positive for a minute. Obama is about the betterment of the American people as a whole. Black, white, brown, yellow, purple, whatever. Think for yourselves don’t allow the media to make your decisions for you.

By: Rudy

Rudy — Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:23:01 +0000

Of course Wright neglects to mention that the slaves were SOLD to the white colonists, by other black tribes, and the arabs, who perfected the slave trade. But blame whitey. If Wright wants to be angry, he should look to the mother continent his church puts first, ahead of the US, where he is free to worship as he pleases, unlike Africa where non muslims are being slaughtered in Sudan, and most countries are still run by dictators who sell slaves like we sell t-shirts. But that also is the white man’s fault.

By: Tim

Tim — Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:26:24 +0000

Paul, Wright’s anger is without justification because it is directed at the present for events of the past. 95% of living white Americans have no more to do with racism than with the man in the moon. Wright’s anger is explainable, but it is not justifiable. Indeed, the entire “theology” to which the man subscribes assumes that white racism is endemic in American society. It essentially “requires” God to be pro-black and anti-white.

Wright does not get a pass here because he came out of the King era (barely). American WWII Pacific vets would have a similar “right” to hate Japanese, but such a view is today considered Neanderthal and just plain wrong. Just because Wright grew up in the age of segregation and lynching does not justify his continued anger at practices that have long since disappeared from America. Society now wants to help the black community help itself solve its problems. While white racists still exist, the vast majority of white Americans want to embrace their black neighbors’ pursuit of the American dream. Indeed, we largely look back at slavery and lynching with puzzled horror, and while we can understand Wright’s hatred for those who inflicted these wrongs, we do not excuse it for two reasons. First, Wright is presumably a Christian teacher. While hatred may be understandable, it is not acceptable in any way in Christianity. Second, the wrongs were not imposed by the current generations of whites. It’s bad enough to have anger and hatred, but it is absolutely improper to vent those feelings at people who (a) had nothing to do with the past wrongdoings and (b) want only to have friendly co-prosperous relations but feel a constant wall of separation due to this misplaced hate.

I believed Obama was sincere in his desire to unite America. I believed he was an idealist with whom I disagreed politically. However, it is very troubling to see him fail to utterly reject the separationist principles espoused by Wright and Trinity, and I now view him as having an ulterior motive in his bid for the presidency. I believe it is fortunate for America that this has come to light, because to elect someone who fails to reject racism this glaring cannot be trusted to be President of the United States due to both lack of judgment and failure to embody the ideals of the American people, black, white, and whatever else.

By: Paul

Paul — Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:40:25 +0000

So after slavery, Jim Crow, discrimination etc, were blacks ever justified in being angry ? ever justified in being angry in hating a country that had enshrined laws that made them less than others who happened to be of a lighter complexion. ? OK so that was back in the sixtys but did you expect that after the passing of the civil rights bill that it would all that anger would go away. Was the civil rights bill passed out of the goodness of the then presiding administration? or was it not hard fought and hard won with sacrifices along the way? racism is an evil irrespective of which ever race practices it but to suggest that for those blacks who came of age during the turbulent sixtys should now just simply forget and embrace the flag and not be angry is to patronise them because it does not acknowledge that they have been scarred by their experiences. Rev. Wright was wrong because his anger is destructive but dont say that it is not without justification