I am Dutch, white, germanic-nordic or whatever you want to call it. My father is Dutch by three generations and then a mix of Dutch, German and Nordic. My mother is three generations also, with origins that are French and Swiss.

Now, when you come up for some air and remove the upper portion of your body from within your backside, take a deep breath and try again….

lmao rofl, what a jerk.

I am Dutch, white, germanic-nordic or whatever you want to call it. My father is Dutch by three generations and then a mix of Dutch, German and Nordic. My mother is three generations also, with origins that are French and Swiss.

Now, when you come up for some air and remove the upper portion of your body from within your backside, take a deep breath and try again….

lmao rofl, what a jerk.

It's NOT your country. You are just an INVADER.

Comparing David Irving to Geert Wilders is LAUGHABLE.

Are you expecting to impress anyone in this blog with such blatant FALSEHOOD?

You are an IDIOT, a MORON an IGNORAMUS.

You eat, drink and breath TAQYIAH on a daily basis and expects that we,the infidels,
are actually BELIEVE in it.

You are wrong. I guess you've already realized that your mission FAILED.

First I am all for my country The Netherlands being ten times more strict and setting up contracts on integration. I am also a supporter of more stringent immigration conditions all round.

Second, Hirst Ali is a sell-hate-for-profit foot. I have met her twice, in a large meeting told her this to her face and the reaction of the two odd thousand others was applause – and she walked out. The audience, by the way, were not Muslims or moslty immigrant but civil servants. She left parliament because she was a failure at it and thus started going for the radical market to get her picture in the press – not because she has a logical issue.

Lastly, single-issue parties come and go, hate-agenda parties do not have to start. We can assume, unlike in the developing world, that the west has already a mature political system. In fact most countries in the west would never have allowed Wilders to start and it is antiquated Dutch laws that nobody bothered to change that allowed it.

ps. Irvine is rightly stopped from travelling to many places and is charged in some for inciting hate yet others like Wilders – whom should be supporting Irine's so-called right to deny – are not because of parliamentary privilidge. That is the point as well.

………

From loonwatch….

Rabbis Arrested: What if They Were Imams?
Posted on 27 July 2009 by Mooneye

In a new case of corruption and political intrigue a group of Mayors from Hoboken, Ridgefield and Secaucus New Jersey, and five Rabbis were among 44 people charged by the US with public corruption and money laundering.

The corruption probe, based in Hudson County, netted many public officials accused of pledging assistance for bribes. A cooperating witness in that probe also infiltrated a “pre- existing money laundering network” that moved “at least tens of millions of dollars through charitable, nonprofit entities controlled by rabbis in New York and New Jersey,” according to a release by acting U.S. Attorney Ralph Marra…The rabbis were charged with laundering money that often was sent to Israel.
The attorney was on the record stating that though they arrested a “number of Rabbis” it did not make this a “religiously motivated case.” These should be comforting words to practitioners of the Jewish Faith and of course reaffirms what is well known in American justice, “You are innocent until proven guilty.” It does, however, highlight the contradictions within our society. Contradictions that are all too apparent to American Muslims.

Let us consider what would have happened if those arrested were not Rabbis, instead, let us say that they were Imams. What would have happened? At the very least, the rabid anti-Muslim blogosphere would be in a fit, Jihad Watch’s Robert Spencer would be linking it to selective pages of 8th century Muslim law books and proclaiming it as all part of Islam’s attempt to take over the world through “Stealth Jihad.” Debbie Schlussel, would be decrying the “inherent criminality” of Islam, while Steven Emerson would proclaim that he has been warning of the “Islamic financial threat” to the West for years. Even in the mainstream media there would be some form of discussion revolving around Islam’s role in influencing the criminal enterprise.

The evident double standards here are hardly noticed in any news outlet. The Rabbis’ faith was not disparaged, nor was any insinuation made that their religion had any bearing on their involvement with the alleged criminal actions — rightly so. But is it too much to ask that when the Islamophobes and other loons come across a similar case in which there are allegations of criminality against Muslims that they should give the same “benefit of the doubt” that they would give to other Faiths such as Judaism and Christianity?

It is a tall order, I know, because the anti-Muslims are motivated by nothing other than a hate for Muslims, and applying a consistent methodology that would distinguish between Faith and Faithful hurts their argument that Islam is the boogey-man monster underneath your bed.

There are no lies in this movie.

You've got to admit that Islam is DANGEROUS. You just CAN'T deny that
intrinsecally Islam deems as foes Jews and calls them “sons of apes and pigs”,
vows to kill all the Jews.

Please, let me sleep better tonight by saying that all of it is a LIE. Muslims
will bring tea and biscuits, a Financial Times copy and a CD with Shubert's
Lieder to me,the ol'crazy and bigot Jewhawk…

The entire assumption here is that there is a collective, coordinated and structured Islamic organisation that is waging some war. There is not.

Such an idea falls flat based on many factors. The first, like the idea of a Caliphate spouted by the most extreme of radicals that is not accepted in the real and actual Muslim world. The fact is that there are 57 odd Muslilm nations, not unified, not supporting the same ideas let alone some radical ideology of world war. Somehow those spouting this anti-Islam BS concepts of threat of war forgets for example that Shi'ites and Sunnis let alone differing cultures make such propoganda as simply trashy hype.

We can assume, though, that there are more sinister reasons for such trashy talk by some – tha perhaps some want war, because of extreme Christian fundamenatalist-evangalist nonesense, some because of trying to look important through looking like the warrior type or the one who “told you so”. Like Wilders, they are trying to create division to profit from them. Terrorists, extremist militants, radical clerics may have, because of a thousand reasons and factors the guns and the bombs, but the poison exists on the other side, through the internet, books and politics.

The enemy is radicalism in all its guises, from OBL to Wilders and by its very nature, the solution to radicalism must come from the complete opposite – normalisation.

Chamberlain indeed! How off-topic can you get!

Do excuse my spelling.

Oh, giving examples of terrorism by HAMAS, which I do consider terrorism does not stick with me, I know it, as I know “what else” happens and the blood that is stained on many hands on both sides.