Pic of the day: Which is safer?

by Infidelesto on March 17, 2008 · View Comments

Do you like this story?

gun-free-zones_1.jpg

hattip: allahspetporker 

No related posts.

  • Tonto (USA)

    Any war vet that shows up on campus unarmed is dealing better with PTSD than I did…..laws or no laws. I still go armed in some places, with only the 2nd ammendment to protect me from the cops. Maybe it would be better to get a CWP….eh?

  • Robert B.

    Tonto, yes. Definitely. The CWP protects you from a real hassle with the law. If you are caught packing heat, you may lose your right to OWN a gun (felony). Be safe. Protect yourself from criminals by carrying. but protect your right to carry by complying with the law.

    That said, I must add that I carry a handgun most times, because it is too hard to carry a cop.

  • Rudy

    Why not just carry a rifle? It is not easily concealed, thus no need for the CWP :P

  • what?

    You guys are psychotic. The 2nd Amendment is completely out of date. And regarding the cartoon, “War Vets”, some of whom are racist redneck traumatized time-bombs (and some are not) are the last people who should be “approved to pack heat”.

  • XD45c

    what?

    By that logic, why not just scrap the whole nation since the founding documents are “completely out of date”?

    As a “war vet” the only thing ticking in me are my joints. I have weapons and will get my HCP (handgun carry permit) when I have time this summer – only because (thanks Robert B.) “it’s too hard to carry a cop”.

    Seriously, they can’t be everywhere their is a violent crime at the time it is happening.

    Victim or gun owner – you decide for yourself.

    I have.

  • Rudy

    I too choose Gun Owner. Let that pansy ass “what?” be a victim. War Vets are the people I prefer to be armed, as they are usually a better shot than the typical thug who would shoot up a college campus.

blog comments powered by Disqus