Haditha conviction hopes crumble for “Party of Defeat”

In this instance, “Party of Defeat” = Democrats, as they call themselves these days. You might also know them as the ‘Cut N Run’ advocates, or recognize them by their repeated calls for surrender to terrorists in Iraq.

THE COLLECTED TALES OF AMERICAN ATROCITIES, WHICH LEFTISTS RELY UPON THE WAY OTHERS SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES FOR SOLACE, is getting shorter. Like allegations of torture at Guantanamo, Koran desecration, and detainee murders in Afghanistan, the Haditha “massacre” is increasingly being exposed as a fairy tale. Unfortunately, this canard was invented and popularized, not by terrorist propagandists to discredit an enemy army, but by American politicians to demonize U.S. soldiers and drain their own nation’s will to fight an ongoing war – a war which we are winning and which the same politicians voted to authorize.

Last Friday, the government dismissed all charges against the third of four defendants accused of perpetrating the aforementioned atrocities in Haditha. All charges against Lance Cpl. Stephen Tatum, 26, were dismissed “with prejudice,” meaning Tatum cannot be tried again for the incident, although by the time the trial commenced, the Haditha “massacre” had already shrunken considerably.

Tatum and three others stood accused, not of murdering “innocent civilians in cold blood” as Congressman John Murtha characterized it, but of failing to properly identify every target before opening fire. In reality, terrorists had fired on the squad from inside the house, and the room where innocent people had been killed was smoke-filled; moreover, according to multiple witnesses, everyone heard an AK-47 “racking” – that is, getting ready to fire upon them. A positive identification would have been both impossible and suicidal. The investigating officers report further observed, according to the prosecution’s case, Tatum would have been absolved of throwing a grenade into the room without positively identifying everyone inside, but not firing his rifle. The government ultimately found his actions had not violated the rules of engagement.

So it looks more and more like this brave Patriot was doing his job, within the rules of the Geneva Convention(which muslim terrorists are not obligated to follow, as evidenced by repeated attacks on civilian men, women and children, holy sites, and any place else they choose to detonate themselves).

Nonetheless, the accused was not unrepentant for his actions, inadvertent of not. Far from the emotionless warmonger often depicted by the leftist press, Tatum nearly broke down on the stand last July, telling the judge: “I am not comfortable with the fact that I might have shot a child…That is a burden I will have to bear.”

Of course no one in the mainstream media will print any such statement from him, for that would prove wrong their depiction of the Defenders of Freedom as cold-blooded warmongers, which the libtards would hate to do, in addition to actually reporting the TRUTH.

I wonder how Jack Murtha sleeps at night, knowing full well he is a traitor not only to his constituents and the Servicemembers he slandered in the media, but also to the Constitution, in that his actions provide not only comfort, but encouragement to terrorists.

There Is 1 Response So Far. »

  1. Jack Murtha = a big, fat pimple on the butt of progress.

    It’s politicos like he that have completely soured me on the US political process; a process in my life that good old Ted Kennedy started by being “absolved” of the death of Mary Jo K. Who, to the best of my knowledge, remains dead and unavenged.

Post a Response