Hezbollah threatens to launch 11,000 missiles at Israel if Iran attacked

by Infidelesto on August 25, 2008 · View Comments

Do you like this story?

Not news really since we already expected Hezbollah to attack Israel once Israel attacks Iran.  All the more reason to destroy Hezbollah’s pathetic armed forces once and for all…

Memri

Muhammad Ra’d, chairman of the Faction Loyal to the Resistance which represents Hizbullah in the Lebanese parliament, said that as soon as the Zionist entity fires the first shot at Iran, 11,000 missiles will be aimed at it.

He also noted that the Lebanese opposition was insisting that it will constitute a third in any government put together from this time forward.

Source: Hizbollah.tv, Al-Anbaa, Kuwait, August 24, 2008

Related posts:

  1. Iran threatens to launch 600 missiles to Israel if attacked
  2. Inching closer to war: Iran tests missiles that can reach Israel
  3. Authentic missile launch photos emerge from Iran
  4. Hezbollah Ready to terrorize UK if Iran Attacked.
  5. Iran threatens US "weak points" if attacked
  • Kal

    Hmmm last time Hizbullah picked a fight with Israel, the only thing that stopped the IDF was pressure from the American Government, after the Untied Nations whined about civilian casualties, caused by Hizbullah jihadists hiding (like the cowards they are) among women and children. Most of the Lebanese I know, and associate with, were cheering on the IDF, and did not want them to stop. Kind of tells the tale of what the true Lebanese REALLY think about Hizbullah…

  • jennyjen

    I think Israel should call bullshit on Hezbullah, they ain’t holdin 11,000 missils-they like to shoot them too much to hold onto that many! Israel needs to throw them 4 Aces on the table and start dealin with these fools the proper way- extermination! Now, thats a muthafuckin Jihad!

  • Tony Eden

    Lets see; last time I heard, the game plan called for the United States to nuke Iran  and Israel told the U.S. that they could easily destroy hizbullah and damascus  as tehran was being blown off the face of the earth.  Before Iran gets a chance to whine to hizbullah, hizbullah will already be having a bad  hadji day.

  • Ali

    Don’t know why it is considered morally superior to sit around waiting for an obvious evil, maniacal, violent, repressive regime to get the upper hand.   Islamists are the enemy of humanity and the world, and pose an existential threat to freedom, democracy, human, rights, civil rights, womens rights, childrens rights, animal rights through the entire world.

    The world has sat on it’s political correct butts before and watched the rise of such a regime.  That regime was only defeated via massive carpet bombing, all out brutal war, after it had managed to extend it terror across most of Europe and the world.  Isn’t it morally superior to ruthlessly wipe out such entities before they expand.  The moral thing to have done in 1979 would be to go into Iran boots and all, no holds barred and not let these evil ideologies get control int he first place.    Now the moral thing to do is go in and remove that regime.  Not like in Iraq where we are replacing the regime with a government of the same ideology…….Islam must go…..it must not be allowed to have political power at all.   Stuff civilian casualties, unfortunate effect of war…….we didn’t defeat nazis or japs by fighting a gentlemens war……….no force has ever won, nor ever will win against a brutal enemy until it adopts the attitude that it’s ideals, culture, and beliefs are superior to the enemies, and that they have every moral right to wipe that enemy out and subjugate them.

    Do you think germany is better today for it……do you think Japan is better today for it.  If we respected the ideology of those enemies and let it be preserved…..what would have happened.

    Use overwhelming conventional forces now……with the gloves off……or be faced with nuclear war later.  Decide which option is morally superior and act on it

  • Ali

    And as far as Hezbollah threatening to launch 11000 missiles at Israel.  Perhaps these aggressive maniacs need a big reminder of just how overwhelmingly powerful the US and western forces are.  Maybe it has been too long since the world seen the result of the nuclear attack.  Perhaps a small nuclear explosion on a Hezbollah stronghold might show the Islamists throughout the world that even their almighty Allah is impotent against the forces of the western world

  • Les

    Attacking Iran by USA or Israel is not a long term solution.
    There will be no peace o earth for the next few hundred years.
    Russians not going to sit around and watch another invasion.
    Here we go WWIII.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/JEWHAWK JEWHAWK

    Israel doesn't need help to properly deal with the islamic cavemen.

    11,000 missiles?With which kind of warheads?Conventional?Chemical?
    Depending of which kind,Israeli Air Force would drop leaflets over Beirut
    with an ominously laconic word written in Arabic,French and English:

    LEAVE.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Kal_El Kal_El

    You missed one. WWIII was the Cold War. It was the Free World against Communism. Communism lost. Thank God. And Ronald Reagan.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Kal_El Kal_El

    You missed one. WWIII was the Cold War. It was the Free World against Communism. Communism lost. Thank God. And Ronald Reagan. This is WWIV, which started in 1979, but was not acknowledged until 9/11/01.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Tonto2 Tonto2

    No sweat. They'd never live long enough to get them off. How many did they get off the last time Israel took a stroll over these. Pooped their nifty new fatigue pants after setting one off and ran like bunnies. Brave warriors with big mouths and no ass.

blog comments powered by Disqus