How does Daily Kos observe 9-11?

They say it’s “ghoulish” and silly to do these remembrances for a “bomb” attack.  I disagree.  I think it’s pretty damned silly to ignore what happened and to become complacent and lose resolve.  I want to remember 9/11 because I want to remember to never give a muslim terrorist and even break.  I want to remember 9/11 so that if I ever get an opportunity to fuck over a islaminazi I won’t falter and show any mercy.  Compare our mourning and the muslims celebrating.  Does that give YOU a warm feeling for muslims?  Not for me. To me, it’s good to know who your enemy is……after seeing a couple videos of muslim “sweetness and light”….ie. dragging burnt bodies through the streets, Clapping and dancing over the attacks on 9/11,  stonings, executions, “honor killings” (those assholes wouldn’t know honor if it bit ‘em in the ass), and burning churches, killing teachers for teaching girls to read……oh yeah.  Most USA people never heard of what I’ve gleaned from here and there on the net.  Most Americans can’t see further than “What’s on TV?” and it’s damn good for them to have a 9/11 reminder now and then, just to wake their asses up.  Those Daily Kos neo-commie, hippie, fag, pussywillow, tinkerbelle, libtards can kiss my brown ass (and probably like it too).  And NO TONGUE goddamnit!

Marxist/Socialists hate America as constituted by our Declaration of Independence, Constitution and Bill of Rights. 

Marxist/Socialists hate America because our Declaration of Independence says that all men are created equal. They wish to re-declare that all men have evolved equally without God; but leftists such as themselves are more equal and should rule over the majority of ordinary religious Americans without their consent through an elitist system of Socialism.
 
“The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a communist revolution.” Karl Marx

Marxist/Socialists hate America because our Declaration of Independence says that we are endowed by our Creator with irreversible human rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. They wish to re-declare that we are endowed by our Socialist Government with reversible human rights which can be re-defined or rescinded by the governing Socialist elite class as the need arises.
 
“The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralize all instruments of production in the hands of the state… Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property”   Karl Marx

Marxist/Socialists hate America because our tenth amendment was written to prevent an all-powerful Socialist State from centralizing governmental power in Washington, D.C. – by unjustly seizing domestic governing power from its rightful owners: The states or the people. These American Socialists have un-Constitutionally seized much of their Socialist governing power by enacting law through Supreme Court case decisions. The American Marxist/Socialists have established a judicial oligarchy which is a perfect example of government power which does not derive through the consent of the governed – government power which bypasses the democratic representative process – perfect for our elite governing Socialist class. American Socialists realize that all really important controversial issues can go their way by this arrangement – no need to fear majority rule. American Marxist/Socialists have established an un-Constitutional system of elite minority rule which contradicts our tenth amendment.
 
“You seem to consider the judges the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions; a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges … and their power are the more dangerous as they are in office for life, and are not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control….When the legislative or executive functionaries act unconstitutionally, they are responsible to the people in their elective capacity. The exemption of the judges from that is quite dangerous enough. I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society, but the people themselves….”  Thomas Jefferson
 
“Bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will, to be rightful, must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal laws must protect, and to violate would be oppression.”    Thomas Jefferson

“The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite.”  Thomas Jefferson

Marxist/Socialists hate America because our Bill of Rights says that we have real freedom of speech. They wish to re-define freedom of speech as that which does not offend them or one of their allies (Islamists). If your speech offends them, i.e.: if you speech disagrees with them, then it is repackaged and re-defined as “hate speech.” Since most Americans hate what they perceive as wrong and hate evil, we will not be able to speak out against evil under the new American Socialist Order. If Leftists come to power in America, i.e.: Barak Obama or Hillary Clinton, “Hate Speech” laws will be enacted. “Hate Speech” is code for Communism.
 
“If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”  George Washington

Marxist/Socialists hate America because there is real freedom of religion. Since the Christian religion believes that certain sexual acts are immoral, and since saying so is “hate speech,” the Christian religion will have to be suppressed – legally suppressed by “hate speech” laws. Leftists will cling to their god – the all-powerful Socialist State – i.e.: Themselves.
 
“The first requisite for the happiness of the people is the abolition of religion.”  Karl Marx
“Religion is the opium of the masses.”  Karl Marx

Marxist/Socialists hate America because there is freedom to defend life, i.e.: the second amendment. The second amendment will have to go too, because they simply can’t allow any real power outside that of the central Socialist Government. Leftist however will cling to their Socialist State-Controlled guns – they will have guns and you won’t.
 
“One man with a gun can control 100 without one.”  Vladimir Lenin
 
“The only real power comes out of a long rifle.”  Joseph Stalin
 
“We don’t let them have ideas. Why would we let them have guns?”  Joseph Stalin

Link doesn’t seem to work. 

Storm-Rider, I like what you wrote so much that I cut and pasted it to send to my address book. Keep these gems coming. Marineland

If you have any doubts whether Barack Obama is a Muslim, then you can watch Libyan Leader Mu’ammar Al-Qudahfi speaking on 11 June 2008 on Al-Jazeera TV where he declares Obama a brother Muslim. Here’s the link to the 7.43 min video on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSemkPCvHo

After you watch it, please send that link to everybody you know, even the liberals. It would be the greatest folly if the USA elected a Muslim to the Whitehouse within eight years of the Twin Towers going down.

“Today’s Neocommunists prefer to call themselves Marxists, which has again become a respected word on college campuses. But Marxism is Communist ideology. What else could it be? If you read carefully, Neocommunism is really out there, only slightly disguised. Just as Soviet propaganda insisted America was rotten to the core, so does the Hard Left and the institutions it controls parrot the line. The People’s History of the United States by Howard Zinn, now a favorite history textbook in the colleges, is proud to “revise” everything we think we know about America, from the true people’s point of view. The heroes of today’s aging New Left are the Old Communist Left, not the democratic liberals of the past. Karl Marx is considered the most important “philosopher” in Britain according to the BBC.”

“Anti-Americanism has come roaring back like a bad rash, flaring up after years of remission. Anti-American rage is pervasive on our Left and the dominant media….Why do they hate us? It’s truly not our fault. The Euro-Left hates us for winning the Cold War, and for showing capitalist democracy to be far more beneficial and compassionate than any State-controlled society. It still drives them to rage”

http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/2007/10/the_evidence_for_neocommunism.html

“The fact that the adherents of socialism themselves have expressed so many contradictory views ought to put us on guard. In addition, notions about the nature of socialism are as a rule strikingly vague, and yet they do not elicit doubt and are perceived as truth needing no verification. This is especially apparent in attempts to make critical evaluations of socialism. Pointing out the tragic facts that so frequently have accompanied the socialist experiments of the twentieth century usually evokes the objection that an idea cannot be judged by the unsuccessful attempts at its implementation. The task of rebuilding society is so immeasurably complicated, it is said, that in the initial stages errors are inevitable; they are, however, due to the shortcomings of certain individuals or the heritage of the past; in no sense do they follow from the fine principles enunciated by the founders of the doctrine. The fact that even in the earliest declarations of socialist doctrine there are schemes which in their cruelty far exceed any real system is dismissed as insignificant.”  Igor Shafarevich
 
 “But how to understand a teaching which in its ideal version includes both an appeal to freedom and a program for the establishment of slavery? Or how to reconcile the impassioned condemnation of the old order and quite justified indignation at the suffering of the poor and the oppressed with the fact that the same teachings envisage no less suffering for these oppressed masses as the lot of whole generations prior to the triumph of social justice? Thus Marx foresees fifteen, perhaps even fifty years of civil war for the proletariat, and Mao Tse-tung is ready to accept the loss of half of humanity in a nuclear war for the sake of establishing a socialist structure in the world. A call for sacrifices on this scale might sound convincing on the lips of a religious leader appealing to a truth beyond this world. But not from convinced atheists. It would seem that socialism lacks that feature which, in mathematics, for example, is considered the minimal condition for the existence of a concept: a definition free of contradictions.”  Igor Shafarevich
 
http://www.robertlstephens.com/essays/shafarevich/001SocialistPhenomenon.html
 

“Plato argues for the necessity of communal property and wives, since only under these conditions will the citizens take joy in and grieve over the same things. In other words, he considers the communality of property and the abolition of the family as means for achieving equality. He regards equality, however, not in the usual sense of equality of rights or opportunities, but as identity of behavior, as the equalization of personalities. Both these traits–the abolition of private property and of the family as a means to achieve equality, and this special understanding of equality–run through the majority of socialist teachings.”  Igor Shafarevich
 
 
“The revolutionaries who drew up the “Conspiracy of Equals” understood equality in such a way that they alone formed the government, while others were to obey implicitly–and those who did not were to be exiled to certain islands for forced labor. In the most popular work of Marxism, the Communist Manifesto, one of the first measures of the new socialist system to be proposed is the introduction of compulsory labor.”  Igor Shafarevich
 
“The usual understanding of “equality,” when applied to people, entails equality of rights and sometimes equality of opportunity (social welfare, pensions, grants, etc.). But what is meant in all these cases is the equalization of external conditions which do not touch the individuality of man. In socialist ideology, however, the understanding of equality is akin to that used in mathematics (when one speaks of equal numbers or equal triangles), i.e., this is in fact identity, the abolition of differences in behavior as well as in the inner world of the individuals constituting society. From this point of view, a puzzling and at first sight contradictory property of socialist doctrines becomes apparent. They proclaim the greatest possible equality, the destruction of hierarchy in society and at the same time (in most cases) a strict regimentation of all of life, which would be impossible without absolute control and an all-powerful bureaucracy which would engender an incomparably greater inequality.”  Igor Shafarevich

 

“We can see that all elements of the socialist ideal–the abolition of private property, family, hierarchies; the hostility toward religion–could be regarded as a manifestation of one basic principle: the suppression of individuality…Finally, human individuality finds its greatest support and its highest appreciation in religion. Only as a personality can man turn to God and only through this dialogue does he realize himself as a person commensurate with the person of God. It is for this very reason that socialist ideology and religion are mutually exclusive.”  Igor Shafarevich
 
“An even more radical contrast between socialism and religion emerges from their views of the essence of man and his role in their respective “anthropologies.” All religions proceed from a recognition of some higher meaning in life, some goal deriving from a higher sphere. Presupposing the existence of God and the possibility of man’s communication with Him, religion thereby admits a certain commensurability between God and man, which is indispensable if only to make possible some sort of contact. (An ant, for instance, cannot enter into contact with man.) Socialism, on the other hand, proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts.”  Igor Shafarevich
 
“the religious aspects of socialism may explain the extraordinary attraction of socialist doctrines and their capacity to inflame individuals and to inspire popular movements. It is precisely these aspects of socialism which cannot be explained when socialism is regarded as a political or economic category. Socialism’s pretensions to be a universal world view comprising and explaining everything -from the transformation of a liquid into steam to the appearance of Christianity – also make it akin to religion. A characteristic of religion is socialism’s view of history not as a chaotic phenomenon but as an entity that has a goal, a meaning and a justification. In other words, both socialism and religion view history teleologically. Bulgakov draws our attention to numerous and far-reaching analogies between socialism (especially Marxism) and Judaic apocalyptics and eschatology. Finally, socialism’s hostility toward traditional religion hardly contradicts this judgment–it may simply be a matter of animosity between rival religions.”  Igor Shafarevich
 
“it is certainly true that socialism is hostile to religion. But is it possible to understand it as a consequence of atheism? Hardly, at least if we understand atheism as it is usually defined: as the loss of religious feeling. It is not clear just how such a negative concept can become the stimulus for an active attitude toward the world (its destruction or alteration) or how it can be the source of the infectiousness of socialist doctrines. Furthermore, socialism’s attitude toward religion does not at all resemble the indifferent and skeptical position of someone who has lost interest in religion. The term “atheism” is inappropriate for the description of people in the grip of socialist doctrines. It would be more correct to speak here not of “atheists” but of “God-haters,” not of “atheism” but of “theophobia.” Such, certainly, is the passionately hostile attitude of socialism toward religion. Thus, while socialism is certainly connected with the loss of religious feeling, it can hardly be reduced to it. The place formerly occupied by religion does not remain vacant; a new lodger appeared.”   Igor Shafarevich
 
http://www.robertlstephens.com/essays/shafarevich/001SocialistPhenomenon.html
 

“The proposition that a striving for self-destruction is the main impulse in socialism has been extracted from a multi-stage analysis of socialist ideology, and is not taken directly from the writings of socialist thinkers or the slogans of socialist movements. It seems that those in the grip of socialist ideology are as little governed by any conscious understanding of this goal as a singing nightingale is concerned with the future of its species. The ideology’s impact is through the emotions, which render the ideology attractive to man and induce him to be ready for sacrifice on its behalf. Spiritual elation and inspiration are the kinds of emotions experienced by the participants in socialist movements. This accounts, too, for the behavior of the leaders of socialist movements in the thick of the fight, down through the ages–their seemingly inexhaustible reserves of energy as pamphleteers, agitators, and organizers.”  Igor Shafarevich
 
 
 “We have arrived at this view of socialism in attempting to account for the contradictions evident in the phenomenon at first glance. And now, looking back, we feel confident that our approach indeed accounts for many of socialism’s peculiarities. Understanding socialism as one of the manifestations of the allure of death explains its hostility toward individuality, its desire to destroy those forces which support and strengthen human personality: religion, culture, family, individual property. It is consistent with the tendency to reduce man to the level of a cog in the state mechanism, as well as with the attempt to prove that man exists only as a manifestation of non-individual features, such as production or class interest.”  Igor Shafarevich
 
 
“There is, first of all, the profound experience of Russia, the significance of which we are only now beginning to understand. The question therefore arises: will this experience be sufficient? Is it sufficient for the entire world and especially for the West? Indeed, is it sufficient for Russia? Shall we be able to comprehend its meaning? Or is mankind destined to pass through this experience on an immeasurably larger scale? There is no doubt that if the ideals of Utopia are realized universally, mankind, even in the barracks of the universal City of the Sun, shall find the strength to regain its freedom and to preserve God’s image and likeness–human individuality–once it has glanced into the yawning abyss. But will even that experience be sufficient? For it seems just as certain that the freedom of will granted to man and to mankind is absolute, that it includes the freedom to make the ultimate choice–between life and death.” Igor Shafarevich
 
http://www.robertlstephens.com/essays/shafarevich/001SocialistPhenomenon.html
 

 “World socialism as a whole, and all the figures associated with it, are shrouded in legend; its contradictions are forgotten or concealed; it does not respond to arguments but continually ignores them–all this stems from the mist of irrationality that surrounds socialism and from its instinctive aversion to scientific analysis…. The doctrines of socialism seethe with contradictions, its theories are at constant odds with its practice, yet due to a powerful instinct–also laid bare by Shafarevich–these contradictions do not in the least hinder the unending propaganda of socialism. Indeed, no precise, distinct socialism even exists; instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something noble and good, of equality, communal ownership, and justice: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach….  The author also convincingly demonstrates the diametrical opposition between the concepts of man held by religion and by socialism. Socialism seeks to reduce human personality to its most primitive levels and to extinguish the highest, most complex, and “God-like” aspects of human individuality. And even equality itself, that powerful appeal and great promise of socialists throughout the ages, turns out to signify not equality of rights, of opportunities, and of external conditions, but equality qua identity, equality seen as the movement of variety toward uniformity…. It could probably be said that the majority of states in the history of mankind have been “socialist.” But it is also true that these were in no sense periods or places of human happiness or creativity.”  Alexander Solzhenitsyn
 
http://www.robertlstephens.com/essays/shafarevich/001SocialistPhenomenon.html
 

“Shafarevich begins with a question: How can we explain the remarkable fact that socialism, which criticizes society for its injustice and inequality, results in even greater inequality? How is it that a system which agitates for freedom has so consistently produced slavery on a massive scale? ….. This Shafarevich says, is the basic allure of Socialism; this is the secret of its seductive power and its driving force; it is nothing less than a deeply emotional, ecstatic urge toward self-destruction. The prospect of the utter annihilation of oneself and of mankind is precisely the attraction of Socialism, and possesses a subliminal motivating power far surpassing any rational economic argument. For Socialism is the final religion of the Theophobians, the God-haters; and God has told us of the inescapable psychological condition of those who deny Him: “He that sinneth against Me wrongeth his own soul; all they that hate Me love death.””  David Chilton
 
http://freebooks.entrewave.com/freebooks/docs/a_pdfs/newslet/preface/03pref.pdf
 

Am I just clueless? What the hell is a Daily Kos?  I know I don’t care for  them after this little cartoon but who the fuck are they? Tonto gives an excellent description, I guess I’ll venture over to their site and fuck my day up reading their anti-American rubbish.
Storm-Rider- you gotta slow down for this country girl haha! Your comments are great and I’m trying to check out all the links!

@jennyjen:

Only the Largest Liberal blog in America

The first thing one must do to become a Muslim is to swear to be a slave for Allah. And Socialism has “consistently produced slavery on a massive scale”. Do these two ideologies share the same source? They have so much more in common. The Devil’s in the details, after all.