Do you like this story?
TweetWAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Or all the free societies of the West will wind up like Lebanon, or worse.
Part 1 – An ideology:
In September of 2001 the President addresses the nation, identifies the enemy as the particular people involved in the attacks, and defines them by the tactics they used. He makes no declaration of war, but pledges to lead us to victory in the war he intends to wage, which, he says, will be long. He defines victory as democracy for the nations behind the attacks. A week later, he reminds us that those who practice the religion of the attackers “must feel comfortable” in America. Two months later, he invites leaders of the religion to the White House, for a prayer meeting.
The President recognized a problem, deplored it, but did not relate it to the meaning, and permanent menace, of the religion of the attackers.
———
To use terms such as “Terrorist”, “Extremist”, “Islamist”, “Islamofascist” and “Islamic radical” is pure folly. These terms carry no information; they don’t identify the enemy this war is against nor their ideals and goals. These terms also mislead by implying that there is some theological or ideological split within Islam over Islam’s basic principles and regulations. THERE IS NO SPLIT. Islam is and always has been a blueprint which seeks to assimilate all cultures and religions into the Arab/Islamic fold:
“These descriptions are very ugly; it is offensive and an insult to our religion. There is no moderate or immoderate Islam. Islam is Islam and that’s it”: Prime Minister Erdogan of Turkey, August, 2007.
“The choices for non-Muslims delineated by Islamic law and Muhammad are conversion, subjugation, or death”: Qur’an 9:29 (Primary) and the hadith recorded at Sahih Muslim 4294 (secondary).
———
It’s a rather sad state of affairs that we still, years after U.S. embassy attacks in Kuwait (1983); Beirut (1983 & 1984); Kenya, Nairobi, and Tanzania (1998); Pakistan (2002); Saudi Arabia (2004); Syria (2006); Greece (2007); Yemen (2008); are trying to decide what to call the community and the stratagem that have targeted us:
The dispassionate term for this unity is “Mujahideen”; the armed wing of Islam; the Muslim guerrillas; Allah’s troops. Whether Arab (Sunni) or Persian (Shi’a) the fact is that Mujahideen, (also known as Fidaai; martyrdom warriors,) are in strict accordance with Islam’s Qur’an and the words and deeds of the Prophet Muhammad as defined in the hadiths. In other words, these people, young and old, male and female, are Sharia supremacists.
The dispassionate term for the tactics they use is “Jihad”; the religious commandment imposed upon Muslims. Jihad describes fully developed and clearly defined theories of war that are substantially more sophisticated than many seem to want to understand. This militaristic, religious-political-juridical ideology values war as a demonstration of loyalty to a deity; demands obedience to its spokesmen; and imposes death penalty edicts over millions of people.
———
Muslims, both Mujahideen (violent) and non-Mujahideen (non-violent), are after the same goal; their only difference is tactical. The non-Mujahideen Muslims believe that infiltration and subversion are more effective than direct, armed attacks in conquering the Infidel (non-Muslims). Ultimately it matters little that they are “not violent”, for they are pursuing through non-violent means the same desire that bin Laden and others are pursuing through violence. On the one hand look at today’s Islamic situation in Europe and then consider the statements of Algerian leader Houari Boumédienne made at the United Nations in 1974:
“One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends: Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory.”
When Muslims migrate to an Infidel land, they do not enter a foreign land: They are actually occupying a land which Allah has reserved for them. Any Muslim will say that the entire earth belongs to Allah; therefore, every Muslim has the inalienable right to move to an Infidel land that Allah has held in trust for them, and then appropriate it, for the sake of Allah:
Qur’an 28:58: “Allah grabs the land of the unbelievers.”
Sahih Bukhari 4.53.392: “If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle.”
Then, on the coercive side, consider what Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, al Qaeda’s commander in Afghanistan said as regards the December 2007 murder of opposition leader Benazir Bhutto:
“We terminated the most precious American asset which vowed to defeat Mujahideen.” (Reflecting Qur’an 9:123: “The believers must make war on Infidels around them and let the Infidels find firmness in them.”)
———
ISLAM, the global totalitarian ideology disguised as a religion, is the enemy. It is ISLAM that propels the styled insurgent groups operating in Uzbekistan, Iraq, Somalia, Lebanon, Palestine, Pakistan, Chechnya, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Africa, and Asia.
1.2 The willful blindness of today’s “free societies”Today, “free societies” have put themselves in the peculiar position of penalizing non-Muslims who make legitimate associations that reveal the unpleasant realities of Islam, as if these comments somehow are acts encouraging “hatred and contempt”. You see, these associations do not reflect our government’s decision to abandon the “aggressive rhetoric” as regards the “war on terror”. The fact that Mujahideen routinely commit violent acts and justify them with reference to Islamic teachings is a fact we are not supposed to, indeed, not allowed to notice.
Related posts:
