Islamic sharia courts in Britain are now 'legally binding'

by Kal El on September 16, 2008 · View Comments

Do you like this story?

More kowtowing to islam by the elite rulers of the Untied Kingdom. Such a shame, a once great and powerful nation selling itself out in the interest of not offending jihadists who want to kill them and install shariah law over the whole of England.

Islamic sharia law courts in Britain are exploiting a little-known legal clause to make their verdicts officially binding under UK law in cases including divorce, financial disputes and even domestic violence.

A new network of courts in five major cities is hearing cases where Muslims involved agree to be bound by traditional sharia law, and under the 1996 Arbitration Act the court’s decisions can then be enforced by the county courts or the High Court.

Officials behind the new system claim to have dealt with more than 100 cases since last summer, including six involving domestic violence which is a criminal rather than civil offence, and said they hoped to take over growing numbers of ‘smaller’ criminal cases in future.

Women are likely to suffer more if Sharia Law, which does treat women equally to men, becomes an accepted legal avenue

The revelations sparked uproar yesterday, with warnings that the fundamental principle of equal treatment for all – the bedrock of British justice – was being gravely undermined.

Critics fear Britain’s Islamic hard-liners will now try to make sharia law the dominant legal system in Muslim neighbourhoods, and warn that women often receive less favourable treatment at the hands of the traditional Islamic courts.

The issue erupted into a major controversy earlier this year after the Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams claimed publicly that formal recognition of sharia law ‘seemed unavoidable’, and Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips gave his backing to the use of Islamic courts to deal with family, marital and financial disputes.

Sharia courts have operated unofficially for years among Britain’s Muslim communities but until now their rulings could not be enforced, relying instead on parties agreeing voluntarily.

The Muslim Arbitration Tribunal panels, set up by lawyer Sheikh Faiz-ul-Aqtab Siddiqi, are now operating in London, Bradford, Manchester, Birmingham and Nuneaton, with more planned for Glasgow and Edinburgh.

Mr Siddiqi said: ‘We realised that under the Arbitration Act we can make rulings which can be enforced by county and High Courts.

‘The Act allows disputes to be resolved using alternatives like tribunals. This method is called alternative dispute resolution, which for Muslims is what the sharia courts are.’

Cases handled by the courts so far include Muslim divorce and inheritance to nuisance neighbours, he said.

Why that DEE DEE DEE Rowan Williams has not been stripped of his position or at least sent to a medical center so his head can be pulled out of his ass is beyond me. His validation of shariah law simply feeds into the problem that the muslim population explosion is going to create for all of Europe in a decade or two. And unlike the United States, Euros have no Declaration of Independence, nor a right to defend themselves (I believe England has now made it illegal to carry a knife, thank goodness, we wouldn’t want a backpack bomber getting stabbed on the way to blow up a subway or a bus.).

Read the entire article in the Daily Mail.

Related posts:

  1. Sharia courts rule on sex lives in Britain
  2. La Times: Islamic Law already recognizd in British courts
  3. First official Sharia Court opens in the UK
  4. Sharia Courts Popping Up All Around Britain
  5. Top UK Judge: Sharia law SHOULD be used in Britain
  • jennyjen

    I think his head is so far up his ass that modern science has declared him a lost cause. Well Brits, there goes the country! It could have been saved with a little rudeness and a lot of testicular fortitude but oh no, lets appease the Muslims!

  • Ron Larson

    Well, have the same thing in the US. It is called binding arbitration, and is used in civil litigation.

    As far as criminal prosecution, we DO have parallel justice systems for native Americans. Pretty similar to the “culturally sensitive” sharia courts being talked about here.

  • Kal

    Ron,

    The big difference is that the Native Americans were displaced, and mistreated. In England it is the Native Britons who are being displaced (look up “No go zones for non-muslims in the UK) and mistreated by the muslim immigrants (read about the numerous muslim gang attacks on Britons here – http://theopinionator.typepad.com/ ). 
    Also, I cannot recall a Native American EVER having strapped a bomb to himself and detonating it in a crowd while shouting the praises of the Great Spirit/Thunderbird/etc… Not that I am criticizing their beliefs, as my ancestors used to tie people to a table, cut them open and raise their internal organs in sacrifice to the sun. While the victim was still alive.

  • Storm-Rider

    Ron Larson said: “Well, have the same thing in the US. It is called binding arbitration, and is used in civil litigation.”

    Our arbitration decisions cannot violate our Constitution with its Bill of Rights. England doesn’t have a Constitution or Bill of Rights, so there is room for tyranny in thier Sharia arbitration arrangement.

    Our arbitration decisions cannot violate our Declaration of Independence, i.e.: “All men are created equal,” and “they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” and “Just powers from the consent of the governed.” England doesn’t have a Declaration of Independence, so there is room for tyranny in their Sharia arbitration arrangement.

    We do not have the same thing in the US.

  • Liz

    I am just wondering if the Sharia couts will be deciding things like honor killings or anything like that? I think England is going to wake up and find that the Sharia courts are going way beyond what is allowed by British law.

  • Liz

    I just read the report about the woman in Canada who has death threats. There’s that Sharia again. It said that Sharia says, if the person “deserves” to die for whatever reason, the person who kills them will have no penalties. Way to go Brits.

blog comments powered by Disqus