Juan Cole: What's the difference between Palin and Muslim terrorists?…Lipstick

by Infidelesto on September 9, 2008 · View Comments

Do you like this story?

More sick and disgusting smears by the Left of Sarah Palin, this one now at Salon.com by Anti-Semite Juan Cole. There really is no bounds as to how far these despicable people will go to compare anything to anyone, even if it means comparing her to the same vile scum filth that attacked us on 9-11, and who’s been vowing to destroy our way of life for longer than we can all remember.

What’s the difference between Palin and Muslim fundamentalists? Lipstick

John McCain announced that he was running for president to confront the “transcendent challenge” of the 21st century, “radical Islamic extremism,” contrasting it with “stability, tolerance and democracy.” But the values of his handpicked running mate, Sarah Palin, more resemble those of Muslim fundamentalists than they do those of the Founding Fathers. On censorship, the teaching of creationism in schools, reproductive rights, attributing government policy to God’s will and climate change, Palin agrees with Hamas and Saudi Arabia rather than supporting tolerance and democratic precepts. What is the difference between Palin and a Muslim fundamentalist?Lipstick.

And he doesn’t stop there…Apparently Palin’s policies are comparable to the brutal, Islamofascist Sharia state of Iran.

Palin’s stance is even stricter than that of the Parliament of the Islamic Republic of Iran. In 2005, the legislature in Tehran attempted to amend the country’s antiabortion statute to permit an abortion up to four months in case of a birth defect. The conservative clerical Guardianship Council, which functions as a sort of theocratic senate, however, rejected the change. Iran’s law on abortion is therefore virtually identical to the one that Palin would like to see imposed on American women, and the rationale in both cases is the same, a literalist religious impulse that resists any compromise with the realities of biology and of women’s lives. Saudi Arabia’s restrictive law on abortion likewise disallows it in the case or rape or incest, or of fetal impairment, which is also Gov. Palin’s position. ‘

Only a very extreme and distorted view of the world could drive someone this far off the track of sanity. The abundance of irrational thought and complete stupidity is staggering.

http://alwaysonwatch2.blogspot.com/ Always On Watch

Is there no end to the stupidity of those who oppose Palin? Apparently not.

You might enjoy this bit of reality about Palin.
Storm-Rider

“But the values of his handpicked running mate, Sarah Palin, more resemble those of Muslim fundamentalists than they do those of the Founding Fathers.”

Marxist lie. The values of Sarah Palin exactly match those of the founding fathers and of ordinary Americans.

“On censorship, the teaching of creationism in schools, reproductive rights, attributing government policy to God’s will and climate change, Palin agrees with Hamas and Saudi Arabia rather than supporting tolerance and democratic precepts.”

There is nothing wrong with teaching creationism alongside evolution in school. By the way, who said God didn’t use evolution in His creative process? Reproductive rights of the mother are legitimate, but the unborn child’s right to life is also legitimate – the two must find a reasonable balance, and I trust a woman like Sarah Palin to strike that balance more than a Marxist like Juan Cole. Hamas and Saudi Arabia are the enemies of democratic precepts of Sarah Palin, and the natural allies of Marxists like Juan Cole. Marxists and Islamists are both elitists, i.e.: they consider themselves above the law because they are the law; and they would rule without the consent of the governed. Marxists like Juan Cole are projecting their own totalitarian pathology onto their liberty-loving opponents.
Tonto (USA)

If these continuing tirades by the insane liberal left and the hysteria thereof don’t convince you that the left is scared shitless of Palin, you’re a dumbass! I just love the fact that these buttheads are going bonkers!
Liz

I think I heard that she wants to teach Intelligent Design, not strict Creationism. But I agree. Keep ranting like a maniac Juan. You’re doing nothing but help McCain/Palin get elected. The more you spout poison, the more the American people are convinced that they don’t want nutjobs like you running the country. The left is going completely crazy….hope they keep it up until they self destruct.
http://www.zhann.com zhann

Personally, I neither like Obama nor McCain, but this isn’t the point at hand. I visit this site for one reason, I get to read what radical conservatives think. This site is one of the more radical sites I have come across. I have had many laughs reading your rants on Liberals, Obama, Muslims … and just about every subject that seems to scare you. However, I haven’t laughed so hard in a while. You guys have no problem making stuff up on the fly when it comes to bashing Liberals. However, say something about a conservative that has a few subtle lies and feel the wrath! What’s scarier, you guys are armed … if that isn’t an argument for gun control, I don’t know what is.

Hypocrisy? Flame on ladies and gentlemen.
Kal

zhann,

You read this site, thanks. I stopped by yours once, and saw ZERO comments, so I left one out of pity, I guess no one reads yours. Not because they are scared of liberals, but because no one cares what you have to say. Apparently you care very much about what we say here. As for us being armed, that is a Constitutional Right, something you liberals love to try and restrict, to no avail. Your so-called ‘gun free zones’ are the direct cause of Virginia Tech and all the various mall shootings where citizens licensed to carry are not allowed to excercise their Second Amendment right to defend themselves and those around them. How am I a radical conservative when all I want is the laws on hand enforced?
Liz

to zhann….ROFLMAO! Let’s see…defend our borders, love life, keep our rights to free speech and to bear arms….that’s radical alright.
jennyjen

The best argument for gun control is the First Amendment. Without our right to bear arms legally, Americans can be silenced by oppressors. Our founding fathers were great men- they knew the threat and gave us the best weapon they could provide- freedom!
Liz

jenny…the left truely believes in free speech, as long as you are one of them. If you aren’t, then they act like Nazi brownshirts. Look at the demonstrators at the RNC. Look at the people who tried to stop the radio program that had the guest who had been researching Obama and his radical ties. Krystalnacht…here we come, only it will be conservatives in their sights. My God…there is example after example of Gestapo tactics. They compare us with radical Islam, but they are like the SS in Nazi Germany. Do whatever it takes to silence the opposition.
Storm-Rider

zhann the Marxist: “This site is one of the more radical sites I have come across.”

Me: Human liberty is radical; it is as radical as the American Revolution

zhann the Marxist: “You guys have no problem making stuff up on the fly when it comes to bashing Liberals.”

Me: Tell us exactly who made up what. If someone has lied on this article, please be a man and quote us the lie. Juan Cole is the only liar here; he said that Sarah Palin’s values resemble those of Muslim Fundamentalists more than the values of our Founding Fathers – that is a lie. Sarah Palin and our Founding Fathers value human life; Muslim Fundamentalists love murder and death. Sarah Palin and our Founding Fathers value human liberty; Muslim Fundamentalists are totalitarian, and they hate human liberty; they rule without the consent of the governed – like you Marxists would also like to do. Sarah Palin and our Founding Fathers value the creative human pursuit of happiness; Muslim Fundamentalists value the destructive human pursuit of tyranny.

Zhann the Marxist: “What’s scarier, you guys are armed … if that isn’t an argument for gun control, I don’t know what is. “

“One man with a gun can control 100 without one.” Vladimir Lenin

“The only real power comes out of a long rifle.” Joseph Stalin

“We don’t let them have ideas. Why would we let them have guns?” Joseph Stalin

Zhann, you are a scary Marxist bastard like Lenin and Stalin; and we are armed to defend our God-given life and liberty from the likes of you and your totalitarian heroes. We are armed because our life and liberty-loving Founding Fathers knew there would be people like you and Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin.
RogerCfromSD

What’s the difference between a well-endowed male model and Juan Cole? A penis.
jennyjen

I agree with you Liz, the “you can say what you want as long as you agree with us” version of free speech doesn’t require a gun- it just requires strong opposition. Every voice has the right to be heard, no matter how ridiculous it is- Juan Cole is a perfect example of noise pollution!
http://infidelsarecool.com Philip Saenz

We real Americans believe in remaining armed with guns because of the crazies that rob, steal, attack, and rape even little girls. What’s wrong with shooting a SOB trying to rape your mother?

About 20 months ago a young lad, not far from here, shot a black dead that broke into his and his mother’s house. The black grabbed the mom and tried to rape her. The young lad, only 14 years old, shot the black to death. What’s wrong with that? The conservatives, people with brains, will say that nothing was wrong with killing a black rapist, and will give the lad a metal. The liberals, people without brains, will condemn the lad, and shed crocodile tears for the scum that was blown away. That’s the way liberals are. Okay, so people with brains are different than crazies without brains. So be it.

P.S. The lad was let go by the judge because it’s the law in my state. You damn right I remain with a loaded gun. If a rapist, robber, or a liberal breaks into my home in the dead of night, I’m going to blow his brains out. You damn right!
jennyjen

Hells yeah Phillip! He was defending his mother, his life and his home! That’s legal in my book! A former judge and many troopers and local officers have told me to shoot to kill and make sure they are actually inside the premises. If you injure a burglar or rapist/potential murderer, they can sue you for medical bills- liberal logic! It totally escapes me but that just proves my brain stem is connected!
Storm-Rider

“Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples’ liberty’s teeth.” George Washington

“Americans have the right and advantage of being armed – unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. “ James Madison

“Arms in the hands of citizens may be used at individual discretion… in private self-defense.” John Adams

“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms..disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed one.” Thomas Jefferson

“The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.” Thomas Jefferson

“The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.” Thomas Jefferson
“The Constitution shall never be construed… to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms. Samuel Adams
Liz

Phillip-Don’t forget the illegal alien criminals who are robbing, raping and murdering our citizens and getting a free pass from the liberals. Every day there is another case in the news. Did you hear about the woman who is suing the Mayor of San Franfreako because of the sanctuary laws that protected the gangbanging illegal criminal who killed her husband and 2 sons. Sanctuary laws…we’d better plan on keeping our guns to protect ourselves since the government won’t.
Kal

Liz,

Look up Joe Horn, from Houston, Texas. He shot and killed two illegals who robbed his neighbor’s house. They happend to be Dominican/African, so of course the liberal idiots cried racism. Nevermind that the wetbacks had ROBBED A HOUSE and were IN AMERICA ILLEGALLY, and had a laundry list arrest record, for drugs and assault. Of course Joe Horn was never charged by the Great State Of Texas. We know how to deal with scumbag criminals
Liz

Like Ron White says, You’ve got a fast lane for the death penalty..Go Texas!!!!
Kal

Actually, we call it the Express Checkout Line
http://thehillchronicles.com/?p=1902 ACLU Renews Its Call For Investigation Into Alleged Civil Liberties Violations At RNC, Blogburst | The Hill Chronicles

[...] the difference between Palin and Muslim fundamentalists? Lipstick, Juan Cole. Be sure to read Infidels Are Cool’s article on this DISGUSTING statement by Juan [...]
Tonto (USA)

I was watching Sara Palin on TV today speechifying. John McCain was standing nearby grinnin’ and nodding. Made me wonder, if the election was today, who would be elected, Palin or McCain. Kinda think it’d be Palin.
I am a member of the “rather be tried than dead” club myself. Glad I’m American and not British. The made it against the law to have a gun there, so when a guy (in Britain) had a break-in by a couple of offenders and defended himself with a Samurai sword (sliced and diced them to near death I guess), they threw HIS ass in jail. Wonder what “rights” he violated on those poor innocent intruders.
Waverely

Isn’t it amazing how upholding the same values in different parts of the world means different things? Sarah Palin DOES have similar beliefs as the Muslim fundis – it’s pretty darn obvious. She’s just a Christian, which for some reason makes it ok… Would you like to be led by a person who thinks that a rape victim has to keep her assailant’s child?
http://scottthong.wordpress.com Scott

Exactly since when did BHO and the Dems not support Hamas, Iran, jihadis et al?
Storm-Rider

Waverely said: “Would you like to be led by a person who thinks that a rape victim has to keep her assailant’s child?”

Please provide a reference link which proves that Sarah Palin believes abortion is wrong in the case of rape.
Kal

Storm,

I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for proof. Proof? PROOF? They don’t need proof! They are liberals! :p
Ross

http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Sarah_Palin_Abortion.htm

Sarah Palin opposes abortion unless the mother’s life is in danger. Even if her daughter were raped, she would push for her daughter to keep the child. However, she’s stated on the record that it is not a governor’s job to legislate such issues, so presumably she thinks it’s not a president’s, either. So you’re both wrong. Palin thinks women *ought* to keep rape-produced children (which Storm-Rider was dubious about,) not *have* to (as Waverley worded it.)

I must admit, I’m always confused by conservatives’ views of liberals. Comments like Kal’s are common, accusing us of having no basis for our claims. And yet all of the best-researched, most thoroughly cited, proof-based publications in America (The New Yorker being a shining example) are dismissed offhandedly. That big, pink, liberal elephant’s in the corner–all you have to do is acknowledge it.
jennyjen

Just gonna put this out there, I’m conservative by nature but I do have a pro-choice stance. For some reason, the government believes that a woman doesn’t own her uterus and she is incapable of making a decision because of said uterus.
It is not for the government to decide under what circumstances a woman can have an abortion. I have a friend who is the product of rape. Her mother did have the option but chose to keep her, raise her and married a man that loves them both and she proceeded to have more children.
Personally, I feel you have 3-4 months to decide, after that 4th month- you are having that child. Give it to a couple that cannot have children if you don’t want the child. Partial-birth abortions should be outlawed, I saw a video of that one time and damn near lost my lunch.
It is the government’s responsibility to ensure the safety of the citizens. Back alley abortions is not something I want to see again in this country or anywhere for that matter. Abortion will happen, whether it’s legal or not. Meth gets cooked, coke and weed get smuggled in, heroin use is on the rise- all illegal and still going strong!
It’s about safety- the government has no room for morals.
Liz

I’m sure that even if Sarah believes in life in rape case, she also believes in adoption. Life is life…either a baby in the womb is alive or it’s not. There’s no middle ground. Truth is truth. I had an abortion many years ago. The truth is, at the time I wasn’t a Christian, but something in me knew I had killed an innocent life. I was on drugs, living in the fast lane. I had every reason logically to do it. But I had a concience, which told me that I had killed my child. That knowledge took me down a very dark path to depression and thoughts of suicide. It took the forgiveness of Almighty God to bring me back. As I said…either it is alive or not.

As to the other beliefs…Islamic fundamentalists believe in killing anyone who doesn’t line up. Christ teaches that we are to lay down our lives for others. He teaches that we are to work out our own salvation. We don’t believe in killing people who don’t believe like we do. We may believe that God says homosexuality is a sin, but we don’t believe in killing people for it. We know that we are all sinners and so we must have compassion on those who are lost. The fight for the unborn, is because we believe that they are alive, human beings, and that killing them is murder. Sorry if people don’t believe that. I guess one day when all will stand before God, we can ask Him. He’t the one who will have ultimate judgement.
Liz

Ross…having read the link you posted, I see that Sarah is for adoption, is pro contraception, and she is against the government making a decision on abortion. She stated that it is up to the people of Alaska to decide the issue. Stick that in the fundamentalist muslim pipe and smoke it!
http://bitsblog.florack.us/?p=11949 The 20 Most Obnoxious Anti-Palin Quotes So Far | BitsBlog

[...] Some examples: 20) “What is the difference between Palin and a Muslim fundamentalist? Lipstick.” — Juan Cole at Salon [...]
http://politicalpartypoop.com/2008/09/17/palin-derangement-syndrome-the-20-most-obnoxious-anti-palin-quotes-so-far/ Political Party Poop

[...] “What is the difference between Palin and a Muslim fundamentalist? Lipstick.” — Juan Cole at Salon 19) “Is our country so divided that the Republicans best hope is a narrow minded, media [...]
http://randythomas.org/2008/09/23/the-screaming-neenies-fear-palin-power/ The Screaming Neenies Fear Palin Power — ETC: Everyday Thoughts Collected

[...] the only difference between Palin and a Muslim fundamentalist is … you guessed it … lipstick. And here stupid me though it might have something to do with a completely different culture and a [...]

Juan Cole: What's the difference between Palin and Muslim terrorists?…Lipstick

Do you like this story?

What’s the difference between Palin and Muslim fundamentalists? Lipstick

Popular Threads

Recent Comments

Other Links