Video: "Are we fighting a holy war?"

by Infidelesto on September 19, 2008 · View Comments

Do you like this story?

Great video

Related posts:

  1. Austria fighting Terrorism too: 3 arrested
  2. The Holy Grail for energy independence.
  3. British Soldiers: No Point In Fighting Back
  4. VA Tech: Fighting Back Is Always An Option
  5. America's first foreign war: lessons learned from fighting muslim pirates
  • Storm-Rider

    We are engaged in just war.  We are fighting a war in defense of God-given Human Life. We are fighting a war in defense of God-Given Human Liberty. We are fighting a war in defense of God-Given Creative Human Pursuit of Happiness.

    We fight for the gifts of our God; our Islamo-Fascist enemy fights directly for their god.

    Our God needs no one to fight on His behalf; but He has left us to fight and struggle for our lives and our sacred liberty – His gifts to us.

  • Chris H

    The answer to the sarcastic question is that “we” are not fighting a “holy war”, but they are.  Last I checked, “jihad” translated to ‘holy war’.  We live in the Dar al Harb, the sphere or world of war, as opposed to the Dar al Islam, the sphere or world of islam (submission, subservience, slavery). 

    We did not seek conflict, or war, but  war has come to us regardless.  Sun Tsu once stated (among other things, and paraphrased) that to be victorious one must know one’s enemy as one knows one’s self.  We have a serious problem in that our politicians won’t bring themselves to name our enemy our of fear – fear not only of our enemy (islamists more than muhammadans in general), but also of our PC (thought-control) police, the 5th column in our own society. 

    It has also been stated that the only way to “win” in a physical conflict is for the other side to be both physically and (more importantly, methinks) psychologically unable to continue the fight.  We are losing on both counts, globally.  Take the Israel-”Palestine” issue.  Israel faces an existential conflict with her enemies, who have vowed to effect her destruction. In each conflict, she stays her hand, leaving her attackers wounded, but unbowed; allows a victory to be spun in the media into a defeat (see Jordan last summer).

    It is necessary to instill respect, and it must be in a language that the attacker understands.   There are times when verbal negotiations, trade restrictions and the like are effective – if that is what causes sufficient pain in one’s adversary to elicit compliance.  If you need an  example, look at  Russia’s use of oil to force compliance by the EU, and its parallel failure in Saddam’s Iraq and Adjimenidad’s Iran.  Respect in many cases translates to fear; fear of another’s power, or ability to enforce his will.

    We, like Israel, have not instilled that respect in those who seek to do us harm, those who have declared open war and whom we, collectively, have refused to identify.  Until “they” gain some respect, i.e., a healthy dose of fear, they only see our equivocation as weakness.

    Although the scale is different, this is no different than the classic playground bully, who is nothing but a small-scale terrorist.  How does one deal with this terrorist?  Reasoning, in my experience, only works on the reasonable, the rational.  From our world view, the jihadis are not reasonable, or rational. 

    So, what to do?

    One must speak their language.  My personal experience is that it is necessary to meet an attack not with a reasonable, measured, and “balanced” response, but a deliberate and calculated OVER reaction.  “They” bomb a school, or a shopping mall, a sports stadium; we wipe out their city.  Let it be known that we may walk softly, but we are both willing and able to swing that big stick.  In my experience, bullies have a severe allergy to those who hit back.

  • Tonto (USA)

    If it’s not obvious to everyone that the libtardo media is flopped so far over to the left it’s pitiful and scared shitless of McCain and Palin, but especially Palin, I must be the only genius in America.  Are we fighting a “Holy War”?  Ain’t nothing ‘Holy” about war.  It’s plumb ugly.  We ARE fighting a war of survival, both outside and inside the USA.  Seems to me that the libs are as bent on destroying America as the isminazi peckerheads.  They sure been trying to prove that with what’s going on in this election.  They want us to believe that we’re loosing in Iraq and Afghanistan and that McCain and Palin don’t have a chance.  You see that all over the tube.  I beg to differ.

  • http://www.traveLightgame.com carolyne

    JEALOUS WOMEN PLUS ONE AND A HALF MEN

    This vicious problem is getting worse.  JEALOUS WOMEN!  There is always a problem with fast talking, angry aggressive women with low self-estrogen
    (I mean esteem) who want the spotlight more than their self-respect.  Example,   PMS Joy ” Bayer” on the View, who is no joy and gives us all a headache.  After listening to  her ugly useless talk you’ll need Bayer aspirin. 
    I just wonder if Joy should be on medication or is she on drugs??
    Maybe on The View, Oprah, The Today Show, the reverse should happen!
    Those kooks should be interviewed on TV then evaluated by a Psychologist.
    I don’t mean Dr. Phil, he’s just as ‘Clueless.’  Just for laughs let’s throw the Huffy Puffy Post woman in there and Suzzzzzzzzzie O who just LUV Obama,  how sick!  Those two sabotage psychos need their heads examined as well, not to mention Michelle Obama.  Who pray tell must never have her own talk show.  Michelle isn’t “cute” or “funny” well maybe funny in a mean kinda sorta way. 
    Good name for The Show:  WHEN THE CIRCUS COMES TO TOWN OR PSYCHO III.
    So has the problem been there all along?  Has the election brought out the worst in people?  Soon after Uncle Wright made his blasphemous debut, things began to really break down.
    What to do?
    Tell them all first: step away from the Television, walk this way to the edge of the cliff,  NOW JUMP! 
    Quiz:  Who are the ONE AND A HALF MEN?
    Answer:   One is a fake Dr. the other is a monkey’s Uncle!

blog comments powered by Disqus