Iran: Tehran could make 60 nuclear bombs in two years, says US expert

by Kal El on October 14, 2008 · View Comments

Do you like this story?

But hey, it’s not like anyone in Iran has called for wiping out an entire nation before, right?

Milan, 10 Oct. (AKI) – Iran may have the capacity to produce up to 60 nuclear bombs within two years, a leading US non -proliferation expert has told Adnkronos International.

Henry Sokolski, executive director of the Washington-based Nonproliferation Policy Education Center (NPEC), was taking part in a summit , “Preventing nuclear proliferation in the Middle East”, organised by Italy’s Institute for the Study of Foreign Policy (ISPI) and the Italian Foreign Ministry in Milan.

In an interview with AKI, Sokolski raised the alarm about Iran’s intentions, claiming that it would have sufficient plutonium after the opening of the Bushehr plant to construct from 30 to 60 bombs.

The nuclear facility at Bushehr is being built under an agreement between the Russian and Iranian governments for 800 million dollars and is expected to begin production in early 2009.

Sokolski said Iran was putting in place the necessary technology and knowledge to recover the new plant’s waste using a chemical process that does not need complex installation or specific structures.

“Plutonium that could be used to make atomic bombs,” he told AKI. “The fuel for Bushehr will be supplied by the Russians who also said they would dispose of the waste products from it.”

But he said few people know that this waste will remain in Iran for two years before being taken away.

“In this time frame the Iranians, with an excuse to analyse the waste, can transfer it to a chemical factory and extract the plutonium,” he said.

He said in the first 18 months the plant would use between 22 to 25 tonnes of fuel, from which 300 kilogrammes of plutonium could be recovered from the waste to make from 30 to 60 bombs.

Henry Sokolski heads the nonprofit organisation founded in 1994 to promote a better understanding of strategic weapons proliferation issues among policy-makers, scholars and the media.

He also serves as an adjunct professor at the Institute of World Politics in Washington and is a member of the Congressional Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, to which he was appointed in May 2008.

Related posts:

  1. Ahmadinejad: Iran Will Not 'Retreat One Iota' in Nuclear Drive
  2. Iran: 'We'll Stop Nuclear Enrichment If You Do'
  3. US and Israel preparing to accept a nuclear armed Iran
  4. Nuclear Terrorism: Jihadist video calls for nuclear strike on West
  5. Iran now has 6,000 centrifuges for uranium
  • http://www.jewwatch.com Marcus

    Oh alas, another bunch of Jews beating the drums of war, this time with Iran.

    Sometimes I wonder if it would have been better if Hitler got to finish the job.

  • Tonto (USA)

    I don’t blame the Israelis.  The mooks have PROVED that they are willing to kill any Jew they can get away with killing.  Abadabadinnerjacket has been talking shit for how long?  I’m surprised that Israel has been so reticent, and MAY have been waiting for somebody to splatter Iran.  The mistake has been that everyone was waiting for some internal element to develop the gonads to take on the mullahs and bring Iran back to sanity….it ain’t gunna happen.  So Israel might as well go bomb the shit out of them, maybe even use nukes, and that will adjust muzlim attitudes in the area for a while until they get stupid again.  I just think Israel wants to avoid a genocide incident.  It will be a slaughter, they could have obliterated hezbullah (pity too, cause Lebanon could use the help) but world opinion caused them to hold back, and in this case (Iran), it might be necessary.

blog comments powered by Disqus