Saudi Arabia’s senior most cleric ok’s pedophelia

by Infidelesto on January 14, 2009 · Comments

Disgusting wretched cancer to the human race.

Daily Mail

CHAD-REBELS/SAUDI

Saudi Arabia’s most senior cleric has told followers it is permissible for ten-year-old girls to marry and anyone who think they are too young are doing the youngsters ‘an injustice’.

Abdul-Azeez ibn Abdullaah Aal ash-Shaikh, the country’s grand mufti, said: ‘It is wrong to say it’s not permitted to marry off girls who are 15 and younger.

‘A female who is ten or 12 is marriageable and those who think she’s too young are wrong and are being unfair to her,’ he said during a Monday lecture.
Al Sheikh’s comments come at a time when Saudi human rights groups have been pushing the government to put an end to marriages involving the very young and to define a minimum age for marriage.
In the past few months, Saudi newspapers have highlighted several cases in which young girls were married off to much older men or very young boys.

Related posts:

  1. Saudi Arabia: 80 year old man marries 11 year old girl
  2. Saudi Arabia: 75 Year old woman to get 40 lashes for breach of “sex segregation laws”
  3. Saudia Arabia: BYOD (Bring Your Own Daughter)
  4. 57 men arrested in Saudi Arabia for flirting
  5. Some insight into the local mentality, of a native in Saudi Arabia
  6. Saudi Arabia: Police arrest 71 foreigners accused of homosexuality
  7. Saudi Arabia: Honor killing claims the lives of two sisters
  8. Saudi Arabia – birthplace of islam – Maid abuse charges dropped
  9. Saudi Arabia: 13 Year old girl sentenced to 90 lashes for bringing cell phone to school
  10. Saudi Arabia: Academic gets 600 lashes for ‘phone relationship’ with female pupil
Want automatic updates?
4 choices: Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or get daily email updates
  • "Disgusting wretched cancer to the human race."

    Hence, beloved of Liberal Fascists.
  • Beejj
    Well there you have it from near the top of Mount Excrement: paedophilia is OK. Of course, the man (man?) is only adhering to the view of his child-raping prophet, so his comments are to be expected. Right, you Muslims who deny your religion does not support this crime against little girls, let's hear what you have to say.
  • I knew this was going to be fun. We can all just share in and scoop up anything that'll anyone look bad. Ok, here's an article that I'm sure we'll all find interesting. A Court ( in AMERICA) OK's sex between teachers and 18 year olds.
    <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28654219/">" target="_blank">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28654219/

    It's fun to do a little research here and there. What's interesting IS, that a minor in America who is 17 and has sex with someone who is older is considered "rape", but MIRACULOUSLY, when this person turns 18 and has sex, it's no longer considered rape as this person is no longer considered a minor. So one day your 17 and your a minor, and the NEXT, your mature, wise, and capable of understanding your actions. How ridiculous are these rules? For people born and raised in America, it's OF COURSE acceptable, because come on, I mean after all, it IS AMERICA. But when a Muslim country has young girls (WHO HAVE PASSED PUBERTY) and are considered for them to be in the age of marriage (let's say 16--for them the norm), than that's RAPE. (SHOCKING!) Does anyone here not even TRY to think? Or is it because they have absorbed so much garbage from the media that they are incapable of ACCEPTING that there are people OUTSIDE of "Good 'Ol America", that happen to DIFFER from their points of view. See, this is why 75% of the world's population don't like America. (Although I'm putting this very lightly) It's a shame this country's got good citizens too. Why should they all be looked upon as ignorant (even though the mass majority are). See, that's what happens when people "generalize". Not all Americans, but the uneducated Americans give the whole of America a bad name. That would be BIAS, GENERALIZING, and STEREOTYPING (something I'm sure people on this site are VERY well aware of as they constantly bombard people of the Islamic faith). Than again, why am I not surprised?
  • dunno_moire
    Wow, once would have been enough XKON. What the heck...is that ten or is it fifteen more repeats below?

    There is evidence that a high ranking Muslim cleric is supporting the marriage of 10 year olds. How is that not of concern?
  • Your Grand Father
    I don't know what ya'll are gettin so worked up about.
    It's only been, like, the last 20 years or so the feminist movement's finally been able to get American society to actually enforce "Age of Consent" laws -- bunch of bullshit if you ask me.
    Hell, the founders of our FREE SOCIETY never had no problem marrying (and fucking) young girls.
    Shit, many even liked to fuck their slaves. And I'm pretty sure they weren't fucking the fat, old ugly ones!
    So don't get all high-and-mighty pretending like this is something new.
    Folks been fucking really young girls since well before the days of Moses.
    Hell, even Moses liked the young pussy. Ain't nothing new!
    Grow the fuck up.
  • Beejj
    Very amusing message, Your Grand Father. Clearly you take the view that once an illegal or immoral act has been committed, it's open slather for the rest of us. Charles Manson would have wanted you to have been his lawyer. Out of interest, give me just one example of high-ranking officials of any other religion sanctioning paedophilic acts. To conclude: am I to understand that those who would protect children from sexual abuse need to grow up? You must disclose your own exploits in such matters.
  • Kal_El
    Ahh so because people were doing these evil things before, muslims get a pass to continue living in the past, and brutalizing children. Way to look after your fellow human beings, sh*t for brains.
  • Jason
    If you are going to make a bullshit claim about someone, hm... say, Moses, for example, then cite your sources. Moses never had sex with children, nor did any of the Biblical patriarchs. It was well understood by the Hebrews, and considered a given, that a girl was not of the age to be married until she was sexually mature. That should be obvious to anyone, no matter their religion or philosophy.

    Another thing YGF, your moronic arguments are self-refuting. You claim that sex with "young girls" is nothing new and imply your own approval. And in the very next breath you condemn sex with slaves. So on what basis do you condemn slavery? It "ain't nothing new" either - and is practised in Islam today!
  • I knew this was going to be fun. Everyone can share in and scoop up anything to make anyone and everyone look bad. Ok, here's an article that I'm sure we'll all find interesting. A Court ( in AMERICA) OK's sex between teachers and 18 year olds.
    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28654219/

    It's fun to do a little research here and there. What's interesting IS, that a minor in America who is 17 and has sex with someone who is older is considered "rape", but MIRACULOUSLY, when this person turns 18 and has sex, it's no longer considered rape as this person is no longer considered a minor. So one day your 17 and your a minor, and the NEXT, your mature, wise, and capable of understanding your actions. How ridiculous are these rules? For people born and raised in America, it's OF COURSE acceptable, because come on, I mean after all, it IS AMERICA. But when a Muslim country has young girls (WHO HAVE PASSED PUBERTY) and are considered for them to be in the age of marriage (let's say 16--for them the norm), than that's RAPE. (SHOCKING!) Does anyone here not even TRY to think? Or is it because they have absorbed so much garbage from the media that they are incapable of ACCEPTING that there are people OUTSIDE of "Good 'Ol America", that happen to DIFFER from their points of view. See, this is why 75% of the world's population don't like America. (Although I'm putting this very lightly) It's a shame this country's got good citizens too. Why should they all be looked upon as ignorant (even though the mass majority are). See, that's what happens when people "generalize". Not all Americans, but the uneducated Americans give the whole of America a bad name. That would be BIAS, GENERALIZING, and STEREOTYPING (something I'm sure people on this site are VERY well aware of as they constantly bombard people of the Islamic faith). Than again, why am I not surprised?
  • Infidelista
    How do you compare a 10 year old child with an 18 year old? Are you that warped that you will defend something just because u are part of it, eventhough it is wrong? How dare you put down the society we live in? (OUR children are protected by laws) It is quite different from a horny old cleric condoning pedophilia. All those horny old men come to the mosque happy in the morning and chant "Allah hu AKbar" after they have maimed a childs body and soul..it is pathetic...but even you Muslims shall evolve one day...maybe in the next 100,000 years...it is a slow process for some reason, quite sad!!!
  • Beejj
    Um, xkon, the Saudi cleric proclaimed sex with TEN YEAR-OLDS is acceptable, not 17 year-olds, so don't try to muddy the waters: stick to the point. You are typical of Muslims who "defend" the villainous practices of your religion by attempted distortion of the matter under consideration. It might work for Muslims, but not for people who have grown up in systems that encourage thought.
    You poke fun at the fact that America and other civilised countries introduce laws designed to protect the young, stipulating a lower age limit for sexual activity, but what else can they do? Your Saudi friend would, like you, abolish such legislation, thereby making available females of any age for Muslim male lust, but enlightened countries make an effort to protect their minors. Your vacuous message shows you feel no need to defend Islamic thinking. After all, you have been indoctrinated since birth to believe the word of a man who had a taste for the little girls, so if it's good enough for him it must be good enough for you.
  • You know, I can't even really bother. It's quite obvious that regardless of what is said to some people, they have a hard time accepting that they are in fact very ignorant. See, I had this discussion before. The only reason you think it would be "OK" at the age of 17 is simply because I proved my point clearly and therefore you are trying to tell me that YOU find the age of 17 acceptable. (But that's not what the government thinks) You just don't want to get it through your head, do you? EVERYONE is thinking according to their OWN logic. You take no consideration of other people's way of living. I'm not saying girls who are 10 years old should get married. We live in the 21st century, and things that were acceptable 1400 years ago are not acceptable today. But you just can't accept the fact that there are different countries who allow girls to marry, say from the age of 13, and you find it none other than disturbing. This plays no part in religion as this was considered the norm long before Islam. It's more of people's customs and ethics. How YOU were brought up differs from how OTHERS were brought up. America does not control or has no right to decide what is considered to be the norm for the rest of the world. How you learn to accept other people's cultures and beliefs is your problem.
  • You know, I won't even bother on this one. It's quite obvious that regardless of what is said to some people, they have a hard time accepting that they are in fact very ignorant. See, I had this discussion before. The only reason you think it would be "OK" at the age of 17 is simply because I proved my point clearly and therefore you are trying to tell me that YOU find the age of 17 acceptable. (But that's not what the government thinks) You just don't want to get it through your head, do you? EVERYONE is thinking according to their OWN logic. You take no consideration of other people's way of living. I'm not saying girls who are 10 years old should get married. We live in the 21st century, and things that were acceptable 1400 years ago are not acceptable today. But you just can't accept the fact that there are different countries who allow girls to marry, say from the age of 13, and you find it none other than disturbing. This plays no part in religion as this was considered the norm long before Islam. It's more of people's customs and ethics. How YOU were brought up differs from how OTHERS were brought up. America does not control or has no right to decide what is considered to be the norm for the rest of the world. How you learn to accept other people's cultures and beliefs is your problem.
  • Beejj
    Dear God, xkon, you are priceless! You have PROVED YOUR POINT????? In your own warped mind, perhaps. Cut to the guts, you moron ..... Saudi Arabia's most senior Muslim cleric proclaimed that sex with 10 year-olds is OK. Tell me of another Western religion that condones this behaviour. Forget all your 17 year-old bullshit and focus on TEN year-olds as your Muslim buddy does. Do you defend this prick? Yes or no? He is, after all, an Islamic bigshot.
    Yes, the West lives in the 21st Century, but you fucks still moulder in the 7th. Do this, please ...... read the shit you just wrote. You are beneath contempt ...... a typical Muslim.
  • Beejj
    Cut to the guts, xkon. This senior Saudi cleric says it's OK to fuck 10 year-old girls. OK with that, are you?
  • Beejj
    Yet again, xkon. your oleaginous sliminess comes to the fore as you try to avoid the issue at hand. This senior Saudi Muslim cleric claims that fucking 10 year-old girls is OK. What is your opinion?
  • I have made a study of the misuse of both age of consent laws and the criminalization of the mere viewing (as opposed to the production) of child pornography (the lower grades being mere nudity) and also the criminalization of violent pornography. These thought-crime laws introduce taboos similar to the Mohammad cartoons debacle.
    There is no doubt that people are facing appalling injustice in the West from this new and extended definition of pedophilia and sex crime, and this issue is raised on the inquistion21 website. This in no way excuses the very real child abuse and abuse of women going on in Saudi Arabia and other parts of the Islamic world-in many ways these abuses are opposite sides of the same coin-extreme anti-sexual feminism in the West, and extreme anti-sexual masculinism in the Middle East.
    Sexual Fascism has turned legitimate child protection into a monster destroying the lives of blameless people, but AT LEAST it is eugenic.
    In contrast, Sexual Communism, otherwise known as Islam, distributes girls, often against their will, equally among the healthy and the unfit and insane, leading to strong dysgenic effects on society.
  • john5555
    the sheikh is our KING , please shut up without proof
  • allahtakesituptheass
    After much consideration, I'm beginning to at least understand, if not quite approve of, the moozies determination to fuck little girls.

    Millenia of inbreeding has ensured that by the time the girls are 10, most will have moustaches just like uncle achmed (dad) and are virtually indistinguishable from the men (for wont of a better term). So I figure the game plan is;

    Get them whilst they're still young enough to be identifiable as female,
    Beat them into submission and rape them until they start producing,
    When they mature and get so ugly you're ashamed of them, apply the garbage bag.
    If she refuses to wear it, "honour kill" her.

    Now it all makes sense. It's probably the only way they can ensure the survival of their "species". Although personally I feel the term "honour killing" should be reserved for use only in the event of moozie suicide. Now THAT would be an honour killing.

    allahsnackbar! you kiddie fiddlers. A jihad on you.
blog comments powered by Disqus