Detroit area muslims trying to stifle free speech over alleged defamation of "prophet" Muhammad

by Kal El on January 31, 2009 · 5 comments

Do you like this story?

Now they are trying to censor the radio, despite claims that what is being said is nothing more than the truth!

Broadcast angers Muslims

Leaders want radio station to stop airing comments by priest they say defame Muhammad.

Gregg Krupa / The Detroit News

SOUTHFIELD — Muslims and interfaith leaders in Metro Detroit are asking a local radio station owner to discontinue broadcasts in which, they say, a Coptic priest has repeatedly defamed the Prophet Muhammad over the past year.

In an Arabic-language broadcast Wednesday on WNZK 680/690 AM, the Rev. Zakariah Boutros said the Muslim prophet Muhammad had engaged in necrophilia and gay sex, according to the Council on American Islamic Relations.

Boutros has previously come under fire from area Muslims, who say he disparages Islam. The controversial, American-based priest can be heard on purchased time slots on radio stations internationally. His words have stirred controversy in Egypt and Great Britain, and are embraced by a number of bloggers and Web sites that criticize Islam.

Amani Mostafa, who hosts the program “Questions About Faith” on which Boutros spoke Thursday, said Boutros was “reading from an Islamic text” when he said, over the air, that the Prophet Muhammad slept in the grave of a dead woman and allowed a man to kiss and caress his chest.

“I am a former Muslim,” said Mostafa, who is now Christian. “I know exactly what I am talking about. These are the things we were taught as children. We are quoting the Quran and the Hadiths, and if the Muslims have a problem with that then they have a problem with their own book.”

Hadiths are Muhammad’s saying or writings, as reported by his followers.

Muslims say that no such wording appears in the Quran or the Hadiths.

“If that’s their excuse, it’s lame,” said Dawud Walid, of CAIR, which distributed a “national alert” Thursday asking Muslims to contact the radio station to express concerns about the broadcast. CAIR also counseled Muslims to be “firm but polite. Hostile comments can and will be used to further defame Islam and Muslims.”

Sima Birach, who owns the station, said he had received some complaints on Thursday, though he said he did not know how many.

In an interview with The Detroit News last summer Birach promised to end the broadcasts, upon the request of interfaith Muslim, Jewish and Christian groups in Metro Detroit.

Birach went so far as to put people associated with Boutros’s broadcasts on conference calls with this reporter, while he berated them for allowing what some consider hate speech.

“It’s not right,” Birach said at the time. “It’s not fair to use some fake or stupid books to accuse someone’s religion. Do you hear me?” But on Thursday, Birach said he had since heard from “several prominent people in the community,” that what Boutros stated in the broadcasts is true.

“Maybe we need to have more meetings,” Birach said, referring to members of the Muslim and interfaith communities.

I will give them credit, at least they have not called for Rev. Boutros to be killed as an apostate or for blaspheming the pedophile Muhammad. This attack on free speech further illustrates the closed-minded mentality programmed into the muslim mind. Whereas people are free to defame Christ (remember that cross dipped in urine, labeled art, by some blowhard hippie?), and face next to no consequence (on earth, anyway). But the moment someone questions the one religion that NEEDS to be questioned today, people cry foul.

Related posts:

  1. Pakistan to EU: Amend free speech regarding defamation of islam or else
  2. Canadian muslims lose bid to deny free speech
  3. Muslims protest question on prophet in history exam
  4. OIC muslims get TV crew kicked out of UN debate on human rights, free speech
  5. Islam: The Free speech asterisk
  • http://danglinginvective.blogspot.com Mark

    I think he has the right to say whatever he wants. However I'm curious – did he give a citation as to which Hadith or verse from the Quran he was quoting or paraphrasing?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Ed_Troy Ed_Troy

    Actually, Robert Spencer at Jihadwatch.org has been covering this for a while. He has a number of pieces covering just this situation, including a new one http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024645.php.”target=”_blank”>http://http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/024645.php.BTW,Al Qaeda ha issued a bounty of $60 million dollars on his head, so he must be doing something right!

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/mosquewatch mosquewatch

    If the Priest backs up his commentary with Islamic texts it isn't slander. It's the truth.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/JEWHAWK JEWHAWK

    By reading the so-called 'holy' Qu'ran you'll eventually find a slew of unbecoming
    coments,to say the least.It will be VERY EASY to prove that Islam is a CANCER-LIKE
    ideology far worse than anything that has ever damaged our society,such as the National
    Socialism and the Marxism.
    For Islam,there is not CURE.

    Europe is trying a very rudimentary method,once used (unsuccessfully,though)
    against Hitler:APPEASEMENT.

    Who'll be the American NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN?

  • angelgringo14

    We must destroy satanic Islam before satanic Islam destroys us. And we can do that merely by telling the truth about satanic Islam.