Italy: Journalist walks off leftist tv show over pro-Palestinian bias

palistinean bias ha ha

see if you can watch this with an open mind

http://www.pppl.org/index.html

Promised land – what a wank!

Good for her! Most Italian are not ready to put up with the mohammedan attempt at takeover.

Good for her! Most Italian are not ready to put up with the mohammedan attempt at takeover.

Good for her! Most Italians are not ready to put up with the mohammedan attempt at takeover.

Propoganda at its best.

I am not quite sure what your succinct message means, "Straliangirl", but if it means you shun that which is written in the Bible you have my full agreement. As I have stated ad nauseum on this site, religion is an insult to intelligence. If you mean, however, that Israel has no right to exist, then you and I have something to debate. I look forward to hearing from you.

Beej, Religion is an insult to intellegence is exactly what i mean. Its also a wank lol

[...] the extreme of Hamasvision, but the media should at least re-evaluate their coverage when even left-wing politicians storm off television sets in protest of the pro-terrorist [...]

Good girl !!

We should remember that our values, unlike Islam, have ultimately come from a Judeo-Christian background. While I'm not one to push organized religion, I still believe that it's the values that Jesus set as example to his followers as well as the ten commandments that have shaped the values of modern western society.

I don't think it's an insult to have beliefs beyond the realm of science as we know it. Ultimately, there are so many unanswered questions. To be an athiest and believe with certainty that there is no God, is really a religion in and of itself.

Hello, JI. "Our" values. Hmm. Not sure about that. There are a few "billion" (milliard) people in South-East Asia who might take you to task about this, although I shall not add my voice to their clamour lest you mount your charger and assault me with cries of Mao and Pol Pot and hurl me to the floor, but I see what you mean. John, my friend, I cannot agree that atheism constitutes a religion in any way, if that is what you imply. So many of the "unanswered questions" will always remain unanswered because the questions are unanswerable: non-questions, if you like. A beauty is The Meaning of Life. Perhaps The Pythons dealt with this one! I agree, though, that the evolution of Western Society owes much to Judeo/Christian thinking. I would be a fool to do otherwise. Hell, yesterday's hideously Christian inauguration ceremony bears ample witness to that (Jefferson would have turned in his grave).
As an atheist I "give my blessing (!!!!!!!!!!")" to anyone who wishes to pursue that which I consider to be utter nonsense. Worship Bertrand Russell's teapot for all your worth if it makes you happy. Be a flat-earther. Proclaim the sun goes round our planet. ( I am not addressing YOU with these words, John.) Follow that nasty, ignorant Mohammed if you wish; but refrain from ramming your baseless my opinion) beliefs down others' throats. Those who choose not to believe in The Paedophile or Jesus, for that matter, are in no way intellectually inferior. Indeed, they may be said to have come to their conclusions as a result of REASON, no matter how misguided or unpalatable "religionists" might deem it.
As a scientist I personally consider religion to be a failure of intellect, but that is my own opinion. Many top-flight scientists would disagree with me, so please do not think I am claiming to be THE VOICE of science.
Muslims, of course, would rail against me. They are MEN (well they have dicks, I suppose, no matter how minuscule), and they prefer to give obeisance to a religion that fosters their domination of women. They will sacrifice their children and mentally-deficient women to preserve this right.
While I frown upon every religion as enslavement, and harbour no respect for any of them, I regard Islam as a danger to humanity: the greatest danger the world faces. Judaism and Christianity and the Eastern religions pose no threat to human progress (it was not always he case!), but Islam exists to enslave people to a mode of thinking that polluted the world a millennium-and–half ago. Muslims languish while others flourish.

wouldn't you agree, though, that an "unanswered question" cannot be a non-question, just because we don't know the answer? We are merely human, and don't have all the answers so it's rather arrogant of us to think we can only validate questions that can be answered.

The reason I equate hardcore athiesm with religion is because it assumes that since there is no proof of God, there must not be God, and are stuck in that belief system, and tend to reject the speculative unknown, grasping to "needing answers" otherwise it can't happen or exist.

If I (not meaning you, Beej, just speaking rhetorically here) showed you, over the course of time, historical examples of the un-explainable (scientific miracles) that have occured quite a bit over our history, you would discount it as "nothing" because of your hardcore disbelief in anything supernatural or unexplained. Hardcore athiests truly believe there is no God, eventhough they can't prove it. Since they're questions remain unanswered, they discount them as impossible even though they can't prove a negative.

Personally, I'm more on the realm of a Jesus admiring agnostic. I believe that Christ truly was a representation of God who came to this planet to instruct mankind on how to live, how to be happy and humble and how to live peacefully. He came to show us those same values in which Western Society still holds dear today.

As far as the specifics of who and what God is, doesn't really matter to me. I believe there is something more, but I don't necessarily believe everything the Bible says. I use it more as a reference on how to live my life rather than a "book of the almighty truth".

Maybe I'm different, but as a former hardcore Christian, I now realize there is more to spirituality and the afterlife than we ever knew, but that doesn't take away the core fundamental beliefs of who Jesus was and who and what he represented. I still believe He's the Son of God, but I also believe the universe is too complex to contain your belief system to one book (Bible) which really is, to agree with you, at the core, an insult to intelligence and Science.

But we should not discount the knowledge that the Bible has given mankind, which is to a certain extent, a valuable point of reference for the fundamental value system which we hold dear. Something that can't be said for the Islamic value system which gets its values from the pedophile murderer Mohammed spreading hatred, control, forced submission, insecurity, strife, abuse, inequality, racism, slavery and ultimately glorifies evil. Islam, as a political, militant and religious system, is at the core, a representation of Satan himself on this planet.

wouldn't you agree, though, that an "unanswered question" cannot be a non-question, just because we don't know the answer? We are merely human, and don't have all the answers so it's rather arrogant of us to think we can only validate questions that can be answered.

The reason I equate hardcore athiesm with religion is because it assumes that since there is no proof of God, there must not be God, and are stuck in that belief system, and tend to reject the speculative unknown, grasping to "needing answers" otherwise it can't happen or exist.

If I (not meaning you, Beej, just speaking rhetorically here) showed you, over the course of time, historical examples of the un-explainable (scientific miracles) that have occured quite a bit over our history, you would discount it as "nothing" because of your hardcore disbelief in anything supernatural or unexplained. Hardcore athiests truly believe there is no God, eventhough they can't prove it. Since they're questions remain unanswered, they discount them as impossible even though they can't prove a negative.

Personally, I'm more on the realm of a Jesus admiring agnostic. I believe that Christ truly was a representation of God who came to this planet to instruct mankind on how to live, how to be happy and humble and how to live peacefully. He came to show us those same values in which Western Society still holds dear today.

As far as the specifics of who and what God is, doesn't really matter to me. I believe there is something more, but I don't necessarily believe everything the Bible says. I use it more as a reference on how to live my life rather than a "book of the almighty truth".

Maybe I'm different, but as a former hardcore Christian, I now realize there is more to spirituality and the afterlife than we ever knew, but that doesn't take away the core fundamental beliefs of who Jesus was and who and what he represented. I still believe He's the Son of God, but I also believe the universe is too complex to contain your belief system to one book (Bible) which really is, to focus too much on hardcore religious ideals, I agree with you, at the core, an insult to intelligence and Science.

But we should not discount the knowledge that the Bible has given mankind, which is to a certain extent, a valuable point of reference for the fundamental value system which we hold dear. Something that can't be said for the Islamic value system which gets its values from the pedophile murderer Mohammed spreading hatred, control, forced submission, insecurity, strife, abuse, inequality, racism, slavery and ultimately glorifies evil. Islam, as a political, militant and religious system, is at the core, a representation of Satan himself on this planet.

Hello, JI. It's always uplifting and invigorating to hear from you. Delicious! Oops, fair point! I should not have said "unanswered questions", but "unanswerable questions". You cannot say, though, in defence of such questions, that we are "merely human", since the questions are ours! There is little point in addressing questions that are impossible to answer. How many angels can dance on top of a pin, or condom?
No, John, the fact that there is no proof of God's existence does not constitute proof of his (?) non-existence. That is not the way of science: never has been; never will. Scientists don't "believe" in anything. Read Feynman and Dawkins. Science does not "validate" questions, but attends to those it has a chance of answering. Say what you will of science, but it is never arrogant. Some scientists might have been guilty of this, but never science, Science delights in scepticism: it acknowledges there are no certainties – that is the stuff of religious dogma. Belief systems? Russell's teapot?
John, my friend, those atheists of the scientific fraternity are not "hardcore", if I understand your meaning of this applied adjective. Should some inexplicable event occur they would take the view that it has no answer AT THE MOMENT, but they would do their damnedest to come forth with an explanation that shuns the supernatural or the pseudo-psychological. Science has no desire to "disprove a negative". That is not science. Science will never dabble in religion or the "supernatural", for they do not lend themselves to the scientific method. We leave that to witch doctors and mullahs or the abominable John Paul II, the best friend the HIV virus ever had.
If you take that view of Jesus, I am genuinely happy for you. He was a good bloke, unlike that piece of shit who could have shown NASA a few tricks.
I applaud your view of the Bible, even though it does not meld with mine. At least that great book has not intellectually caponised you, as the Muslim comic has enslaved its unquestioning adherents.
You say the universe is too complex to contain my belief system. I DO NOT HAVE A BELIEF SYSTEM. I am a scientist!
What knowledge has the Bible given mankind, other than some useful history in the Old Testament? A value system is not knowledge, although, as a scientist, I know full well that knowledge is not everything.
I have tried to answer the questions you raised, although I am, in all likelihood, far from "qualified" to do so. Clerics of various hues might don their armour to joust with me, but they would all come a cropper in the face of reason. Yes, we scientists have a LONG road to travel. Hell, we have been at it for only 400 years, but we will USE OUR INTELLECTS to discern truth, knowing that dogma leads nowhere. Religion despises reason. It fears it.
Your final sentence is beyond reproach, apart from the reference to Satan, but I understand your meaning. Islam is the greatest evil the world has ever faced, but Civilisation will undoubtedly triumph over it. Islam has no balls, only noise.

Good on you, Straliangirl. A wank has its good points, though!

Hell, JI, I just wrote you a long message, but it seems not to have appeared, yet. I hope it does!

@Beej,
"A wank has its good points, though!"

Umm, I am not even gonna comment on that one…

LMFAO!

Very wise, Kal_El. The less said, the better! Focus your energies upon Muslims. I am tempted to call them wankers, but they have lots of little girls to despoil in their Islamic states, and it must be borne in mind that as they strap explosives to their bodies in readiness for slaughter in a shopping centre they are determined to enter their Paradise with full scrotums (scrota?) to take full advantage of the 72 Mother Theresas awaiting them. Oooooooooooh, I think I'll convert!

Don't know what happened, Beej, not seeing your comment anywhere.

Dammit, JI, it took me AGES to write it because I attempted to attend to all the points you raised. You are a man for whom I have enormous respect, so I am seriously cheesed off that my efforts have gone to waste. You and I have certain opinions that clash, but I value all you say because your views are the result of THOUGHT rather than dogma.

Second attempt, JI. Briefer, this time……..
1. Yes, I should have said "unanswerable questions". Thank you for correcting me.
2. I cannot agree that non-belief is itself a belief. Essentially, the atheist denies the existence of God because there is no evidence. Until evidence is forthcoming he will maintain this view.
3. There are no miracles in science. Science can never, and has never, "dabbled in the religious", if I may put it this way. The God of whom we speak is not quantifiable, so science cannot go there: the scientific method cannot be applied to investigations of God. Yet, a large number of scientists are believers even though their belief cannot be based on scientific reason. Science does NOT say that there is no God. It has no right to.
4. Jesus was a tremendous man; a good chap! His teachings were of great value to humanity (even if many of his followers have committed vile deeds in his name, but this is not Jesus's fault).
5. I have no argument with your next statement.
6. Again, no argument, even if I do not share your view. Yours is as valid as mine.
7. Absolutely correct. Islam is a force for evil (to use a "religious" word). It has no redeeming features. If Satan exists, a strong argument could be mounted to lay claim to his being a Muslim.

@Beej,

I think we found your uber long post

Thank you so much, Kal. I wanted JI to read it because while he and I differ in our views on certain matters, I always enjoy his contributions and would like to believe he feels similarly towards mine.

Dear Beej,once I said the exact words you've said about religion until I began
to read and watch DVDs about ASTRONOMY.Once you know how small we are,how fragile
life on Earth is,how RARE are the odds to exist a planet like ours that you start
to believe that it is TOO MUCH COINCIDENCE that we are in here talking
to each other through a computer.Look at this issue as a mathematical one.

ITALY'S LEFT:

Few italians support Israel,not only in the left.For most of them,Israel
has not even the right to exist.I do not get impressed because one or
two expresses some kind of decency.

Hello, JEWHAWK. The great Richard Feynman was about to deliver one of his brilliant lectures to a packed lecture theatre. He began something like this ………. "When I walked through the car park a few minutes ago, I saw a car which had the number plate …………. (he quoted the number plate). Just consider that! What are the odds against my seeing that number plate at that moment?!" The audience erupted in laughter. Get the point?
Don't ever fall into the trap of thinking that because something is incalculably improbable one must therefore invoke the existence of something even more improbable to explain it. I think Occam's Razor raises its head at this point!

'Israeli Ambassador Gideon Meir also sent a protest over the show’s content to RAI management, saying it was a “shameful spectacle.”'

someone gag me… yes boo-hoo poor jewish people why oh why does the world ever express ANYTHING pro-palestinian??? israelis are the only victims here right people???? ….pitiful, and people say muslim people whine over anything anti-islamic?? come on, i hate choosing sides but this is ridiculous….a new level of hypocrisy we strive to reach with each passing day…. or people are just REALLY that bloody stupid.

you know what else comes from a judeo-christian background? read the bible and the torah, you'll find some mind-numbing evidence of straight up INSULT to women…. those are all good judeo-christian values though. and fyi, i'm not a pusher for any one religion either, but some of the comments people post are blatantly ignorant.

“Muslims, of course, would rail against me. They are MEN (well they have dicks, I suppose, no matter how minuscule), and they prefer to give obeisance to a religion that fosters their domination of women. They will sacrifice their children and mentally-deficient women to preserve this right. “

off topic, but dick size is more determinable by a person's ETHNICITY, not a person's RELIGION, considering most religions on this planet have people of different races, including islam, their dicks come in all different shapes, sizes, and colors. just thought i'd let you know. peace out.

Gosh.