[...] 01:15AM (Brian of London): We want PEACE! We want PEACE! We want PEACE so much we’re going to smash your head in till we get it: [...]

[...] its logical in the minds of Hamas supports in London (and elsewhere) obviously. Infidels are Cool has all the details on the goings-on in London from the rioting [...]

[...] clipped from infidelsarecool.com [...]

I used to go to that Starbucks, what the hell!

You Brits are wusses. Get out the AR-15s and start dispersing the crowd in body bags. Send some more troops to Afghanistan! Do you guys even know how to fight?

“Do you guys even know how to fight?”

Of course the Brits do.Remember DUNKIRK and SINGAPORE??

http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/fall_of_si…

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/765004.stm

“RULE, BRITANNIA”…

Yeah,right…

Thank God America do exists.If it weren't for the Americans,
I wouldn't even be alive today.

Yes, Jewhawk, the Brits are a curious lot. They spend their lives laughing at themselves and putting themselves down, but when push comes to shove foolish is he who stands in their way. Bulldogs have strong jaws and very nasty teeth. They laugh loudly at jingoism, but when they are aroused out of their slumber they become rabid jingoists and present a real danger to those who threaten them. It's not just the English, either. There are the Scots – these bastards would put the fear of God into anyone once their blood is up. There are the Irish – tangle with these mad bastards at your peril. And there are the Welsh – a peaceful lot of singers of hymns until they are crossed (winners of the greatest number of VCs in a single action in Britain's history). True, economics have been such that Britain has called upon Americans, God bless 'em, to haul them out of holes, and the Yanks have always been prepared to shed blood despite dark forces that endeavoured not to do so. Any Briton who would not throw himself in front of a train to save the Yanks is not a true Briton. But Britain is arguably the most democratic country on the planet, so it allows cowards such as Blair and Brown to take the reins and even to undermine all the country has ever stood for. But it passes, just as Chamberlain gave way to Churchill and Carter gave way to Reagan. Pour not too much scorn upon Britain, for as sure as God made little green apples there will be a Thatcher or a Lloyd George or a Churchill lurking in the shadows, ready to grasp Excalibur and set about the villains as Samson smote the Philistines.

Yes, dear boy, we do. We fought two world wars in their entirety, not like some johnny-come-latelies.

Beejj,the UK could've prevented WWII.Hitler teased the Brits with the Sudets,then the Anschluss…as he
perceived that was Ok to invade Czechoslovakia he put the gear of the Wehrmacht into full throttle.

America was a “johnny-come-lately” in WWI.Was an entire new experience for the Americans,but General
Pershing's troops managed to tilt the odds for the allies.British and French were financially BROKE in 1916.
America's participation occurred in 1917,just in time to assure our victory.

During WWII,America only joined the UK pratically in 1942,but before that sent millions of tons of military
stuff and food,desperately needed in the british isles due to the German submarines.

At the end of the day,America's mighty industrial output was the real winner.The Soviets would've collapsed
without it.Praise also is due to CANADA's agro-industrial help.
Make no mistake.Wars are won in the LOGISTIC theater.The unsung hero of WWII was the American 2,5 ton
truck,simply VITAL to deliver everything a soldier needs on the battlefront.
The bottom line is that,without America,Great Britain would belong to the Third Reich today,Israel wouldn't
exist and I would be speaking to you with the help of a MEDIUM.

BRITISH GOLDEN CONTRIBUTION:

1) Winston Churchill's LEADERSHIP and RESOLVE.
2) The ROLLS-ROYCE MERLIN engine.
3) The RADAR.
4) The BRITISH INTELLIGENCE,who cracked several times the German secret codes.
5) RAF Bomber's Command and his Lancasters who decimated several German cities,by night.
6) The British territory itself,who served as a HUGE American aircraft carrier.

Jewhawk, I am keenly aware of WW I and II events and the massive contributions made by the American industrial machine. Believe me when I say I realise Britain's and the free world's debt to that mighty country – and not only in military materiel. I wrote that which I did when I read the words of whoever it was who asked if the Brits have forgotten how to fight, or some such thing. Never think I am anti-American!

Paul Michael Owens you are a dickhead!
Visit Michael Yon's website and read his account of the Brits' tussles with theTaliban.
As someone who has witnessed the Brits' prowess in war games in Germany the epithet “wusses” does not spring to mind.
This was a simple low key riot that was brought under control.
What do you expect another “bloody sunday” episode?
We might be a somewhat layed back sort of nation;but as Beej says when push comes to shove;
we can deliver with maximum prejudice!(ask an Argentinian?)
If you really believe what you write then try the SAS enlistment tests.(open to all who think they're tough enough; and televised!)
If you're not; then go back to sleep in your armchair.Like all blowhard twats; whose hero fantasies are a product of their puerile computer game mentality.
Real soldiers are currently fighting a savage war in Afganistan not offering mindless horseshit from the safety of their PC.
Let's hope they don't come for you one day.If you really have an axe to grind then take it up with the Germans who do not engage the enemy(politics)but only help with logistical support.

Poetic stuff Beej and exactly right!
Curiously on a recent visit to the states I was often asked why Britain supported the USA
in their belligerant foriegn policy.
My stock answer was because what's right is right;and besides that a debt of gratitude
was owed to the USA from the two world wars.
I also added that the fact that EU's attitude to America was disgraceful;and Britain's total union with Europe would be a shameful disaster(one size does not fit all).
I hadf a conversation with a German lawyer on the whole subject and shocked him with my
chauvinistic stance,
This was when East German neo Nazi's were murdering Vietnamese women and children on the basis that they represented a threat to their employment.(the old Auslanders raus!)
I retorted that Germany was full of Auslanders and that they might try those tactics on the British army(my suggestion was to start with a Scottish regiment “the Argylls “were posted in Herford at the time).
He grinned and said even “they” were not that stupid.
QED bullies always stay clear when there's a distinct possibilty of lethal retaliation.
Muslims are living examples of this principle!

“…only help with logistical support.”

Please,Hellosnackbar,do not understimate the EXTREME importance
of logistical support.It simply means the difference between victory and
defeat…life or death.

Get yourself a darn valiant S.A.S. platoon over Tora Bora,Afghanistan…
they'll fight day and night with the Taliban,much more acquainted with
the terrain.There will be several hundreds of ragheads,armed with RPG's
and AK-47's with almost limitless ammo.

The SAS's men will need WATER,FOOD,AMMO,FUEL,BLANKETS…
Whatever they'll ever need is a job of the logistical support,in this case
made by Chinook helicopters,an EASY PREY for the muslim cavemen.
Yep.It's a pretty dangerous task.
Transporting those much needed items to the stranded SAS folks by
land is even a more hazardous thing.The Talibans are experts in ambushes
and road-side bombs.
During WWII, General Patton had a huge appreciation for the American lorries's drivers,
many of them were black soldiers,rejected by the main combat units
because of their skin color.
They were VITAL for the allied War effort.

GERMAN SUPPORT:

It's a political choice.They think that skipping real combat
will render political approval back home,where the German Left
is extremely powerful.
If a right-winger politician decides to change Germany's stance
regarding bloody,face-to-face combat in Afghanistan,it will face
a backlash of the entire European COMMIES.
The left will make preposterous anologies with Hitler,the Wehrmacht,
etc,etc,etc.And this EVEN with the UN approval…
Germany is an easy prey for that kind of stuff.Well,they surely made the bed
and ought to sleep on it.

You're right JH it's just that the perfidious influence of the German left makes me want to throw up!
I'm still disgusted from an incident in Bremerhaven when I saw a stupid German leftist cow spit at American troops on their way to the gulf.
When I reminded her that but for American largesse she wouldn't be there to spit on anyone;she spat on me!
I just about restrained myself from smacking her in the mouth;something that might have haunted me later.

European,specially the young,WORSHIP letist icons such as Che Guevara,Fidel Castro
and recently,President Hussein.It became a TRADITION to be a left-winger.

Since Adolf Hitler,to call himself a “right-winger” doesn't sit well with the European
intelligentsia,the ELITE,the jetset.It's considered as “bad taste”,kitsch,CHEAP…

Now, people who love their countries as they knew it BEFORE the tidal wave of
foreign immigration are ISOLATED.No,they don't consider themselves “nazis”,but
just want their countries back,without being forced to see muslims everywhere.

Calling those people as “right-wingers” is a stretch of imagination.Well,if I were a
German citizen (actually I could apply for that,because my family came from Germany)
and dared to say that I did not want to hear TURKISH on the streets of Mainz or Hamburg,
for instance,I'd be labelled a “racist” by the German Left.

This isn't fair.

Many Germans wish to see a more powerful country.Politically speaking,the foreign policy
of a country is as good as its military capacity.Both Japan and Germany MUST regain their
military pride.It will be a WONDERFUL thing for all of us,who fear the islamic growth.

To think for just a second that a “Military-strong Germany is bad,because could be Nazi again”
is an IDIOT.The same could be said about Japan.Both are PERFECT DEMOCRACIES,and having
them as powerful countries again would be a VICTORY for the Western Civillization.

Oh boy, I am glad I got you guys all riled up.

Stop thinking about the past and see what the future holds for you.

Your wives will soon be wearing burqua's. Jesus, even France is outstepping you in your assimilation to the Moooslim Nation.

Why do you continue to allow people who think a murderous pedophile is their prophet to make gains on your individual freedoms?

“Your wives will soon be wearing burqua's”

This WILL happen.It could take 25,40 years…but the
way our society is obsessed of being politically correct,
this process could take even less time.

It will be the Western Civilization's demise,as we know it.

Will we FIGHT?

Nope.We will become a bunch of DHIMMIS.
And our daughters will be wearing BURKAS and HIJABS
and losing their virginity when they reach the islamic maturity,
that is,SIX or SEVEN years.

Museums,theaters,nightclubs,pubs,churches,concert halls will be closed.

As everything we love is un-islamic,our lives will be EMPTY and SAD.We
will become nostalgic about a past in which we simply LET the muslims
gradually overcome our former glorious western culture.

The music of Beethoven,Haydn,Mozart,Bach,Chopin will be thrown at
a huge bonfire.
It will be WORSE than what the Nazis did AND the Chinese Cultural
Revolution and the Khmer Rouge put together.
In 50 years,we all be living in a “PLANET OF THE APES” scenario.

Amazing self-control. That skank deserved a smack…or something. This reminds me of Code Pink freaks. They are disgusting beyond description.I hope to run into one of them someday…

The report mentions that many of the rioters were masked. Is this allowed in Britain? It shouldn't be. This brings to mind another question. In Australia and perhaps other countries motor cycle helmets must be removed prior to entering a bank. What about Muslim women who are clad such that only their eyes are visible? Are they allowed in banks? If so, enterprising bank robbers might put this acceptance to profitable use. Of course, it might be argued that such downtrodden women would never be trusted by their macho husbands to perform banking duties, but that does not answer my question. I see a great future here for bank robbers.

Beejj – Yes, they are allowed in banks, at least here in the US. I have heard of several cases where Muslim women have been asked to remove their headscarves, but it always ends with their claims of discrimination and “being singled out” that get filed with organizations like CAIR. They probably wind up getting a settlement, or at the very least a public apology for the “humiliation” of being asked to conform to the rules of countries they do not belong in. Even if it is clearly posted that wearing head coverings of any kind is not allowed, we know that this will exclude Muslims…for “religious” reasons of course.
These crafty Muslims have already realized financial gain by wearing burqas to commit crimes. Just a few days ago, I read of a jewelry store that was robbed by men wearing burqas…in London, I think. Bank robberies, if this has not already happened, surely will. I'm going to start using the drive-up window from now on.

Britain needs to assert its sovereignty over its internal enemies. The Muslims are in the process of destroying your country, just as they do to every country foolish enough to allow them to poison it.

The question here is not military prowess, but allowing your country to be destroyed from within by people who explicitly are about crushing the current majority and imposing their barbarity on all. I am not blaming you as an individual. You might even be a victim of Muslim imperialism. And I, in the US, am also going to share your fate unless we band together, identify the Muslim poison in our countries and destroy them. So, this is a political and cultural problem, not simply a military one.

Agreed Eric! the problem is the dhimmi politicians and of course the Muslim's unrivalled
propensity to breed.(not to mention immigration)
I am of the opinion that Islam should be treated in the same way that the Americans treated communism in the fifties.
A council for the investigation of uncivilised activities.
I see no conflict in marginalising any group for whom freedom of speach is anethema.

Britain needs to assert its sovereignty over its internal enemies. The Muslims are in the process of destroying your country, just as they do to every country foolish enough to allow them to poison it.

The question here is not military prowess, but allowing your country to be destroyed from within by people who explicitly are about crushing the current majority and imposing their barbarity on all. I am not blaming you as an individual. You might even be a victim of Muslim imperialism. And I, in the US, am also going to share your fate unless we band together, identify the Muslim poison in our countries and destroy them. So, this is a political and cultural problem, not simply a military one.

Agreed Eric! the problem is the dhimmi politicians and of course the Muslim's unrivalled
propensity to breed.(not to mention immigration)
I am of the opinion that Islam should be treated in the same way that the Americans treated communism in the fifties.
A council for the investigation of uncivilised activities.
I see no conflict in marginalising any group for whom freedom of speach is anethema.