Cairo: Islamobomb goes off in cafe packed with French tourists

by Infidelesto on February 22, 2009 · Comments

Maybe I’m jumping the gun, I’m sure it had nothing to do with Islam.

BBC

A bomb explosion in Cairo has killed at least one person and injured 17 others, mostly foreign tourists, police say.

The dead person was identified as a French tourist. An unconfirmed report from Reuters news agency said there were four dead, two of them foreigners.

The blast happened outside a cafe packed with French tourists in the historic Khan al-Khalili area.

The explosion was relatively small, most likely caused by a home-made explosive device, police believe….

Related posts:

  1. French teen killed by Cairo bomb was on class trip
  2. Yemen: Four South Korean tourists murdered by Allah Bomber
  3. Egypt: French salafists expelled after attack in Cairo
  4. “Moderate” muslim cleric urges Muslims to beat up Infidel tourists
  5. Mauritania: Suidice bomber detonates near French Embassy
  6. Somalia: Armed gunmen kidnap French security advisors
  7. Afghanistan: Bomb attack kills one French Soldier, 9 wounded
  8. Iran: Beating up tourists in Shiraz
  9. HUGE explosion: Islamic terrorists Bomb Marriot Hotel in Islamabad
  10. Video: Iran Mosque Bombing
Want automatic updates?
4 choices: Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or get daily email updates
  • xkon
    A FORMER JEW (NOW MUSLIM) : Islam Forbids Killing Innocent Civilians:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7qQC7XcJSs&feat...
  • Ray
    No wonder .
  • xkon
    Rajiv, remind me exactly WHO thinks it's okay. Do you mean the so-called Muslims that call themselves Muslims and who do not know anything about their religion Islam? And does it matter what a Muslim THINKS? Whatever happened to the teachings of Islam?

    Answer this for me. Why do some homosexual priests THINK it's ok to be gay? Does Jesus not condemn homosexuals in the Bible? And we're not talking about ordinary Christians here. We're talking about PRIESTS. Yet some think it's okay, or do they not?

    Humans are the problem. Not the religion.
  • Beejj
    Xkon, whenever Muslims commit atrocities you invariably claim they are "so-called" Muslims who do not follow the Koran. According to you, the Wahhabists in Saudi are so-called Muslims, as are the Taliban, no doubt. Yet they vehemently and proudly proclaim that they are doing just that. Sunnis and Shi'ites delight in killing each other. So-called Muslims? OK, according to your logic we have just eliminated over 90% of Muslims (so-called, of course) from Islam. Gosh! And to think I believed the boast that Islam is the fastest growing religion!
  • xkon
    Beej, if you cannot find me evidence in the Quran giving permission for Muslims to kill innocent people, then your statements are only meaningless. Muslims who do not follow the Quran are not good Muslims; period. It doesn't matter which "leader", "sheikh", or whichever so-called Muslim says otherwise. And as for "Wahhabi's" or "salafi's" or "shi'aa's", etc., none of these sects exist in Islam. People who believe in the Quran and follow the teachings of the Prophet are called Muslims. You don't just make up different sects to lead people (like Christians do). You're either Muslim, or you're not.
    And Beej, I do advise you to work on your math. Do you and everyone here make up your imaginary little numbers to make yourselves satisfied?
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    This is dedicated to you (and every other Atheist):

    http://ponderingbrain.blogspot.com/

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FzDV3Z6l2Q&feat...
  • Beejj
    Xkon, you are rapidly becoming a figure of fun; a joke. Wahhabis and Shi'as are NOT MUSLIM??? Iran and Saudi are thus not Islamic states!! (Yet, in a previous post you said there are no Christian churches in Saudi Arabia because it is 100% Muslim, remember?) Just consider: Mecca is not in a Muslim country! Ayatolla Khomeini was not Muslim! You are a fruitcake, xkon.
  • xkon
    Beejj, do you have some sort of brain deficiency? Did I SAY that someone being a Sunni, Shi'a, Wahhabi, etc., means they are not Muslim? Do you not even TRY to use your brain? When a person believes in the six pillars of faith, meaning in ONE GOD, in the Angels, in the Prophets, in the Books, in the Day of Judgment, and in predestination, then they are MUSLIM. There's no such thing in ISLAM as "Sunni" or "Shi'a". The Prophet didn't have a "sect". You're either Muslim (by following the Quran and the Prophet) or you're NOT. There may be different sects existing today, but they all believe in the same thing. They only differ on how they should govern/establish a Muslim society. That is what I was trying to say. I don't think it could have been THAT confusing for you to understand.
  • Beejj
    Dear oh dear, xkon, you really must try harder to express yourself with clarity. Strange that there Muslims called Sunnis and Muslims called Shi'ites, who enjoy killing each other. Perhaps someone should tell them they don't exist. Confusingly, you then go on to say "there may be different sects existing today...." So they DO exist, yes? This is better than wave/particle duality. Anyway, no matter what label is attached to the Taliban murderer, or Jordanian or Pakistani honour killer of women, shouldn't someone tell them that "Islam forbids the killing of the innocent"? Ah, but can you see the loophole? Define "innocent", your Taliban cousin and Paki nutcase would say. And who is to judge innocence or guilt? Some low-life, uneducated drongo whose only conception of learning is his reading of the Koran - which is clearly open to multitudinous interpretations, as the most superficial inspection of Wahhabi (oops, I mustn't use that term!) society reveals?
    "They ONLY (!!!!!!) differ on how they should govern/establish a Muslim society." Gosh, that sounds so cosy and insignificant, doesn't it? Leaving aside the vexed question of the wisdom of a religion governing any society, such governance is the work of people, and if the bad guys achieve control bad stuff is going to follow. The Taliban provide proof of this. No doubt the ladies of Saudi might have a few things to say, too.
    It comes down to this, ultimately: How do non-murdering Muslims regard the murdering Muslims, and if they disapprove, what do they try to do about it? Is there a great movement afoot to stamp out their excesses, or is it believed that a few quiet vocal admonishments will suffice. If they do, I've got news for them: it ain't working.
  • xkon
    "Perhaps someone should tell them they don't exist. Confusingly, you then go on to say "there may be different sects existing today...." So they DO exist, yes?"

    Beejj, get it through your skull. In ISLAM, sects DON'T exist. So if in reality sects DO exist, it does NOT in ISLAM. That's doesn't mean the different sects aren't Muslims, it just means they have different OPINIONS on rulings and NOT in regards to the teachings of ISLAM. Can you finally understand?

    "No doubt the ladies of Saudi might have a few things to say, too."

    Yeah, funny how you mention what Muslim "women" would say, even though you thought I was a male to begin with. Who are YOU to say what Muslim women would think? I was a female the whole time I was refuting your arguments about Women regarding Islam, yet you only assumed a MALE would have had these opinions. You know NOTHING about Islam. Did you know that out of every five converts to Islam in the U.S., FOUR of them happen to be women? You know NOTHING about Women's Rights in History, do you?
    Beejj, Islam is multiplying in numbers far exceeding that of your own brain cells. Go educate yourself.
  • Beejj
    By the way, xkon, brain cells do not multiply. Is that what they teach you in Muzistan?
  • xkon
    Yeah Beejj, I know that brain cells don't multiply. Which is why I didn't say they were.

    "Islam is multiplying in numbers far EXCEEDING that of your own brain cells."

    [Learn to read as I already know you have a hard time comprehending]
  • hellosnackbar
    Are these increasing muslim hordes actually "fucking"their way to victory?
    I think we should be told.
  • Ray
    BINGO . Just looking at various nations fertility rates which is on the decline and which is on the rise. Verifies exactly what you have said. And that is all they've got going for them. A worthless malignant parasite upon the land being led by an old hack pedophile. Furthermore this useless excuse for a piece of flesh lemming Xkon talks about "math" IAC has repeatedly exposed the shear numbers of islameo's who on a daily basis are committing sins against Christians in so many ways that space does not permit their listing. And he tries to pawn that BS of . He'd make a great politician if he weren't so pathetic, huh guy's . But I guess as the F their way into the world like cockroaches we will be seeing more of this on IAC posts. Xkon , go find a cliff...
  • Beejj
    Don't bandy words with me, you silly boy. Read your own sentence and analyse it. Now go out and buy Jean Sasson's books.
  • xkon
    Because I know it must be frustrating for you, I'll just let it go.
  • Beejj
    Xkon, try getting this into your ruined brain: I really do not care a rat's arse about Muslim sects: the fact that there are Muslims of whatever flavour is sufficient to turn my guts and put me on my guard. I also care not a fig for what is written in your foul book, but I deeply care about the deeds of those who DO read the damned thing. You would have us think that the catalogue of evil perpetrated by Muslims (9/11, Mumbai, Bali, London Underground, honour murders, Spain, Munich '72, Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc etc etc) has nothing to do with what these ragheads read in the Koran, or is not inspired by some dirty mullah who fills them with thoughts of the greater glory of Islam, BUT NOBODY BELIEVES YOU. As I asked previously, what do "decent" Muslims do about these pigs? Nothing. Their silence makes them as guilty as the killers.

    Yes, the ladies of Saudi might well have something to say, given their downtrodden lives. As I suggested to you in a previous post, read the trilogy by Jean Sasson, beginning with "Princess". You'll enjoy discovering about "the ladies' room" (although you might already have one at home). As far as you, personally, are concerned, I don't give a damn what method you choose to urinate, so don't try to throw in red herrings. And also refrain from telling me what I assume and what I know or don't know about history. Still, your vacuous diatribe prompts the thought that someone should write a book entitled "Women's Rights In Islam: Theory and Practice." Of course, Jean Sasson has already set the ball rolling ......
  • He is already Don't give him that much credit
  • Kal_El
    Why not? I always give credit where credit is due, when it comes to making me laugh :P
  • Rajiv
    If the religion strictly prohibits it, then why do they think it is OK? Virgins in heaven or some shit?
  • xkon
    "Maybe I’m jumping the gun, I’m sure it had nothing to do with Islam."

    Hmmm...yet you only get your resources from specific places. Let's compare your article to let's say this article:

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29331958

    [One of the highest religious officials in the country, Sheik of Al-Azhar Mohammed Sayyed Tantawi condemned Sunday's attack calling it "cowardly and criminal."

    "Those who carried out this criminal act are TRAITORS to their religion and country and are DISTORTING the image of Islam which rejects terrorism by PROHIBITS the killing of innocents," he said.]
  • They should have been more strict with the security around the area knowing that there are lots of Islams around there. Now I'm not saying Muslim people are all warfreaks but it is those who are that placed dirt on their name. I mean we all know that MOST and not ALL of the terrorists are Muslims.
blog comments powered by Disqus