Slavery still practiced in muslim Mauritania

by Kal El on February 10, 2009 · 58 comments

Do you like this story?

Gee what a total mindblower, slavery in the 21st century, from the religion of peace.

SLAVERY: STILL A PAINFUL REALITY IN MAURITANIA

(ANSAmed) – TUNIS, FEBRUARY 10 – “Slavery is a painful reality in Mauritania” said President of the Mauritanian organisation SOS Slaves Bairam Ould Messaoud, at a debate in Tunis. “There are families who still have slaves and use them in their homes and farms, without any intervention by the authorities”, especially in the far east and south of the country. Ould Messaoud pointed out that slavery has been against the law since 1984, and said that the ban has never fully worked because “slaves are tied to their owners by intellectual, religious and financial bonds”. He also pointed out that the government made reforms to the law in 2006, tightening financial sanctions against law breakers. However, added President of the Association of Women Support of the Family, Aminatou Bent, this law has never been observed in practice. And she maintains that the authorities are doing little “to end the suffering of many young women who are victims of varying types of abuse, including sexual abuse”. Young women who are usually taken from the poorest regions of the country, or who have come to the capital to escape areas affected by the droughts of recent years, according to Sarah Al Sadeq, a Mauritanian activist. In her opinion government action is completely insufficient in tackling and even in recognising the situation. Unfortunately, she said “community organisations do not have the financial resources to draw up precise classifications, while the authorities are unlikely to give much attention to the problem”. According to Mauritanian journalist Maryam Bent Mohamed Laghzaf, “freed slaves cannot be socially independent, as they are in a state of poverty. Because true slavery is financial, and not racial, as many people assume. Many patrons have freed their slaves, but the freed slaves find themselves in very difficult economic circumstances which make them want to go back to living under the authority of their former patrons”. “The State”, said Mohamad Lamain Ould Idad, Human Rights commissioner for Mauritania “is currently engaged in a fight against the effects of slavery and is offering equal opportunities for all social categories”. In his opinion the Mauritanian government insists that slavery belongs to the past and what little remains of it will soon disappear. (ANSAmed).
2009-02-10 16:22

I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for reparations, like so many demand from the American Government, which actually went to war to end slavery in the US. The muslim world won’t even help their so-called brothers, the Palestinians, why would they help slaves?

Related posts:

  1. Al Qaeda decapitates 12 Mauritanian Soldiers
  2. Slavery alive and well in muslim countries, as one victim speaks out
  3. Sharia Doctrine and 'Temporary Marriage' aka Sex Slavery
  4. Moroccan businessman reduces his employees to slavery
  5. Islamic cowards attack Israeli embassy in Mauritania
  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    For the loner that posts these articles to ridicule Islam, it's clear the hatred you have against Muslims has gotten you to be bored out of your mind. Are people seriously that free that they only have time to criticize the actions being done by Muslims (who not all represent the true teachings of Islam), but fail to look upon the teachings of their own religion? Let's see what Christianity has to say about Slavery. And those who are against slavery…are against the Bible?

    Exodus Chapter 21, verse 20:
    If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property.

    [The Bible condones slavery, but the concept of beating your slaves is OK, as long as you don't kill them. ]

    Does anyone NOT read the Bible?

    Exodus Chapter 21, verse 1:

    Now these are the ordinances which you shall set before them. When you buy a Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, and in the seventh he shall go out free, for nothing. If he comes in single, he shall go out single; if he comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master's and he shall go out alone. But if the slave plainly says, 'I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free,' then his master shall bring him to God, and he shall bring him to the door or the doorpost; and his master shall bore his ear through with an awl; and he shall serve him for life.

    [This describes how to become a slave for life, and shows that it is completely acceptable to separate slaves from their families. ]

    Interestingly enough, these verses weren't posted by Muslims trying to make Christians look bad (like how this site tries tremendously and pathetically to do so), but in fact, by former CHRISTIANS.

    You pick up the big scoop, and so will I. Here's a RECENT article about sex SLAVERY in AMERICA:

    For the loner that posts these articles to ridicule Islam, it's clear that the hatred you have against Muslims has gotten you to be bored out of your mind. Are people seriously that free that they only have time to criticize the actions being done by Muslims (who not all represent the true teachings of Islam), but fail to look upon the teachings of their own religion? Let's see what Christianity has to say about Slavery. And those who are against slavery…are against the Bible?

    Exodus Chapter 21, verse 20:
    If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property.

    [The Bible condones slavery, but the concept of beating your slaves is OK, as long as you don't kill them. ]

    Does anyone NOT read the Bible?

    Exodus Chapter 21, verse 1:

    Now these are the ordinances which you shall set before them. When you buy a Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, and in the seventh he shall go out free, for nothing. If he comes in single, he shall go out single; if he comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master's and he shall go out alone. But if the slave plainly says, 'I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free,' then his master shall bring him to God, and he shall bring him to the door or the doorpost; and his master shall bore his ear through with an awl; and he shall serve him for life.

    [This describes how to become a slave for life, and shows that it is completely acceptable to separate slaves from their families. ]

    Interestingly enough, these verses weren't posted by Muslims trying to make Christians look bad (like how this site tries tremendously and pathetically to do so), but in fact, by former CHRISTIANS.

    You pick up the big scoop, and so will I. Here's a RECENT article about sex SLAVERY in AMERICA:

    For the loner that posts these articles to ridicule Islam, it's clear that the hatred you have against Muslims has gotten you to be bored out of your mind. Are people seriously that free that they only have time to criticize the actions being done by Muslims (whom not all represent the true teachings of Islam), but fail to look upon the teachings of their own religion? Let's see what Christianity has to say about Slavery. And those who are against slavery…are against the Bible?

    Exodus Chapter 21, verse 20:
    If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property.

    [The Bible condones slavery, but the concept of beating your slaves is OK, as long as you don't kill them. ]

    Does anyone NOT read the Bible?

    Exodus Chapter 21, verse 1:

    Now these are the ordinances which you shall set before them. When you buy a Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, and in the seventh he shall go out free, for nothing. If he comes in single, he shall go out single; if he comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master's and he shall go out alone. But if the slave plainly says, 'I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free,' then his master shall bring him to God, and he shall bring him to the door or the doorpost; and his master shall bore his ear through with an awl; and he shall serve him for life.

    [This describes how to become a slave for life, and shows that it is completely acceptable to separate slaves from their families. ]

    Interestingly enough, these verses weren't posted by Muslims trying to make Christians look bad (like how this site tries tremendously and pathetically to do so), but in fact, by former CHRISTIANS.

    You pick up the big scoop, and so will I. Here's a RECENT article about sex SLAVERY in AMERICA:

    For the loner that posts these articles to ridicule Islam, it's clear that the hatred you have against Muslims has gotten you to be bored out of your mind. Are people seriously that free that they only have time to criticize the actions being done by Muslims (whom not all represent the true teachings of Islam), but fail to look upon the teachings of their own religion? Let's see what Christianity has to say about Slavery. And those who are against slavery…are against the Bible?

    Exodus Chapter 21, verse 20:
    If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property.

    [The Bible condones slavery, but the concept of beating your slaves is OK, as long as you don't kill them. ]

    Does anyone NOT read the Bible?

    Exodus Chapter 21, verse 1:

    Now these are the ordinances which you shall set before them. When you buy a Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, and in the seventh he shall go out free, for nothing. If he comes in single, he shall go out single; if he comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master's and he shall go out alone. But if the slave plainly says, 'I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free,' then his master shall bring him to God, and he shall bring him to the door or the doorpost; and his master shall bore his ear through with an awl; and he shall serve him for life.

    [This describes how to become a slave for life, and shows that it is completely acceptable to separate slaves from their families. ]

    Interestingly enough, these verses weren't posted by Muslims trying to make Christians look bad (like how this site tremendously and pathetically tries to do so), but in fact, by former CHRISTIANS.

    You pick up the big scoop, and so will I. Here's a RECENT article about sex SLAVERY in AMERICA:

    Are people seriously so free to the point that they only have time to criticize the actions being done by Muslims (whom not all follow the true teachings of Islam), but fail to look upon the teachings of their own religion? Let's see what Christianity has to say about Slavery. And those who are against slavery…are against the Bible?

    Exodus Chapter 21, verse 20:
    If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property.

    [The Bible condones slavery, but the concept of beating your slaves is OK, as long as you don't kill them. ]

    Does anyone NOT read the Bible?

    Exodus Chapter 21, verse 1:

    Now these are the ordinances which you shall set before them. When you buy a Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, and in the seventh he shall go out free, for nothing. If he comes in single, he shall go out single; if he comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master's and he shall go out alone. But if the slave plainly says, 'I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free,' then his master shall bring him to God, and he shall bring him to the door or the doorpost; and his master shall bore his ear through with an awl; and he shall serve him for life.

    [This describes how to become a slave for life, and shows that it is completely acceptable to separate slaves from their families. ]

    Interestingly enough, these verses weren't posted by Muslims trying to make Christians look bad (like how this site tremendously and pathetically tries to do so), but in fact, by former CHRISTIANS.

    You pick up the big scoop, and so will I. Here's a RECENT article about sex SLAVERY in AMERICA:

    Are people seriously so free to the point that they only have time to criticize the actions being done by Muslims (whom not all follow the true teachings of Islam), but fail to look upon the teachings of their own religion? Let's see what Christianity has to say about Slavery. And those who are against slavery…are against the Bible?

    Exodus Chapter 21, verse 20:
    If a man beats his male or female slave with a rod and the slave dies as a direct result, he must be punished, but he is not to be punished if the slave gets up after a day or two, since the slave is his property.

    [The Bible condones slavery, but the concept of beating your slaves is OK, as long as you don't kill them. ]

    Does anyone NOT read the Bible?

    Exodus Chapter 21, verse 1:

    Now these are the ordinances which you shall set before them. When you buy a Hebrew slave, he shall serve six years, and in the seventh he shall go out free, for nothing. If he comes in single, he shall go out single; if he comes in married, then his wife shall go out with him. If his master gives him a wife and she bears him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall be her master's and he shall go out alone. But if the slave plainly says, 'I love my master, my wife, and my children; I will not go out free,' then his master shall bring him to God, and he shall bring him to the door or the doorpost; and his master shall bore his ear through with an awl; and he shall serve him for life.

    [This describes how to become a slave for life, and shows that it is completely acceptable to separate slaves from their families. ]

    Interestingly enough, these verses weren't posted by Muslims trying to make Christians look bad (like how this site tremendously and pathetically tries to do so), but in fact, by former CHRISTIANS.

    You pick up the big scoop, and so will I. Here's a RECENT article about sex SLAVERY in AMERICA:

    Um……. xkon …… Christianity follows what is known as the New Testament, not the Old Testament. Find something in the New Testament that in any way supports the concept of slavery. I'm waiting ……..

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Interesting, Christians no longer consider the the Old Testament as the word of God? Last time I checked, Christians follow the Old Testament, or is it no longer good enough because the New Testament fixed up by Man sounds more pleasant? It seems you are escaping from the subject at hand. Why are verses such as these considered to be unworthy? But don't take this from me. Take it from a fellow former Christian:

    " According to Jesus, the Old Testament is alive and well. According to Isaiah 40:8, "the word of our God stands forever." The notion that these old testament verses no longer apply is completely untrue according to the Bible. Christians imagine that they "no longer apply" as a way of rationalizing their religion.

    It is when you start thinking about the Bible in this way that you understand something very important about the Bible. Either the entire Bible really is God's Word, or the entire Bible was written by primitive men with absolutely no input from God.

    There really is no middle ground and the Bible has to be an all-or-nothing book. Either the entire Bible came from God, or none of it did."

    There's really no point in denying in it. I don't understand why people change the words of God just to make their religion look more appealing. It's sad, and it's more pathetic when you have people like that challenge other people of different faiths (like Islam) by either denying or inadequately rationalizing their own religion.

  • Greg

    Boy it is weird how the muzzies love to turn to the old testament of the Holy Bible and say that that is what Christians follow. Its like…. the bozos can't figure out what the word "CHRISTIAN" MEANS…like they can't break it down or something…..
    and even in modern day Mauritania the muzzies still look at the old testament and 3000 years ago…..Sad group of bozos, those muzzies.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Kal_El Kal_El

    Hey,

    Xkon, cute nickname. Notice in the article how Americans PROSECUTE the perpetrators? What happens in muslim countries like Saudi, UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco? NOTHING. Nice try though, your taqqiya is getting stronger.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Kal_El Kal_El

    Xkon

    Notice in the article how Americans PROSECUTE the perpetrators? What happens in muslim countries like Saudi, UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco? NOTHING. Nice try though, your taqqiya is getting stronger.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Kal_El Kal_El

    Xkon

    Notice in the article how Americans PROSECUTE the perpetrators? What happens in muslim countries like Saudi, UAE, Kuwait, Qatar, Jordan, Egypt, Morocco? NOTHING. Think I am lying? Go to Beirut, and ask a cab driver where is a good place to meet girls. He will immediately suggest a superclub, which is another term for brothel. Same in Amman, Dubai, Manama and Damascus. Nice try though, your taqqiya is getting stronger.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Kal El, you truly enlighten me with your shear ignorance. I am after all on an ignorant site, so maybe I should explain "slowly" for those incapable of comprehending. First of all, you replied to my last post by not ONCE refuting my argument. Therefore, I'm presuming you agree with me.
    Now replying to what you said. Americans PROSECUTING the perpetrators? Yeah Sherlock, tell me something I don't know. Maybe now it is my turn to inform you about something you obviously don't know about. I'll try my best to explain as articulate as possible so maybe once someone will get through someone's head.
    The word "Islam" and "Muslim" are TWO separate words. With me so far? Being a "Muslim" does not mean you follow "Islam". Unlike Judaism and Christianity, being a Muslim is not a "title" you are born with, or simply by just having "faith". It is the practice of faith. If a Muslim does not follow the teachings of Islam, then he or she is not regarded as a real or good Muslim. In fact, all these so-called Muslim countries are not practicing Islam. The governments that run these countries are better corrupting ignorance than anyone else. Yes, it's a shame, and in fact, these people are a disgrace to Islam. But what does that have to do with Islam? The problem isn't because of Islam, it's because of the Muslims that aren't following Islam. No country that truly practices the real teachings of Islam would run or even look like as it is today. If anyone were to ask me which country follows a good example of the teachings of Islam. I would say NONE. Learn to differentiate between "Islam" and "Muslims" as they are two different things. And if you think otherwise, maybe you'd like to give me evidence to all these pathetic lies about the teachings of Islam, because I for one would just love to know about these so-called "facts".

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Kal El, you truly enlighten me with your shear ignorance. I am after all on an ignorant site, so maybe I should explain "slowly" for those incapable of comprehending. First of all, you replied to my last post by not ONCE refuting my argument. Therefore, I'm presuming you agree with me.
    Now replying to what you said. Americans PROSECUTING the perpetrators? Yeah Sherlock, tell me something I don't know. Maybe now it is my turn to inform you about something you obviously don't know about. I'll try my best to explain as articulate as possible so maybe once I'll get it through someone's head.
    The word "Islam" and "Muslim" are TWO separate words. With me so far? Being a "Muslim" does not mean you follow "Islam". Unlike Judaism and Christianity, being a Muslim is not a "title" you are born with, or simply by just having "faith". It is the practice of faith. If a Muslim does not follow the teachings of Islam, then he or she is not regarded as a real or good Muslim. In fact, all these so-called Muslim countries are not practicing Islam. The governments that run these countries are better corrupting ignorance than anyone else. Yes, it's a shame, and in fact, these people are a disgrace to Islam. But what does that have to do with Islam? The problem isn't because of Islam, it's because of the Muslims that aren't following Islam. No country that truly practices the real teachings of Islam would run or even look like as it is today. If anyone were to ask me which country follows a good example of the teachings of Islam. I would say NONE. Learn to differentiate between "Islam" and "Muslims" as they are two different things. And if you think otherwise, maybe you'd like to give me evidence to all these pathetic lies about the teachings of Islam, because I for one would just love to know about these so-called "facts".

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Kal El, you truly enlighten me with your shear ignorance. I am after all on an ignorant site, so maybe I should explain "slowly" for those incapable of comprehending. First of all, you responded to my last post by not ONCE refuting my argument. Therefore, I'm presuming you agree with me.
    Now replying to what you said. Americans PROSECUTING the perpetrators? Yeah Sherlock, tell me something I don't know. Maybe now it is my turn to inform you about something you obviously don't know about. I'll try my best to explain as articulate as possible so maybe once I'll get it through someone's head.
    The word "Islam" and "Muslim" are TWO separate words. With me so far? Being a "Muslim" does not mean you follow "Islam". Unlike Judaism and Christianity, being a Muslim is not a "title" you are born with, or simply by just having "faith". It is the practice of faith. If a Muslim does not follow the teachings of Islam, then he or she is not regarded as a real or good Muslim. In fact, all these so-called Muslim countries are not practicing Islam. The governments that run these countries are better corrupting ignorance than anyone else. Yes, it's a shame, and in fact, these people are a disgrace to Islam. But what does that have to do with Islam? The problem isn't because of Islam, it's because of the Muslims that aren't following Islam. No country that truly practices the real teachings of Islam would run or even look like as it is today. If anyone were to ask me which country follows a good example of the teachings of Islam. I would say NONE. Learn to differentiate between "Islam" and "Muslims" as they are two different things. And if you think otherwise, maybe you'd like to give me evidence to all these pathetic lies about the teachings of Islam, because I for one would just love to know about these so-called "facts".

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Kal El, you truly enlighten me with your shear ignorance. I am after all on an ignorant site, so maybe I should explain "slowly" for those incapable of comprehending. First of all, you responded to my last post by not ONCE refuting my argument. Therefore, I'm presuming you agree with me.
    Now replying to what you said. Americans PROSECUTING the perpetrators? Yeah Sherlock, tell me something I don't know. Maybe now it is my turn to inform you about something you obviously don't know about. I'll try my best to explain as articulate as possible so maybe once I'll get it through someone's head.
    The word "Islam" and "Muslim" are TWO separate words. With me so far? Being a "Muslim" does not mean you follow "Islam". Unlike Judaism and Christianity, being a Muslim is not a "title" you are born with, or simply by just having "faith". It is the practice of faith. If a Muslim does not follow the teachings of Islam, then he or she is not regarded as a real or good Muslim. In fact, all these so-called Muslim countries are not practicing Islam. The governments that run these countries are better at corrupting ignorance than anyone else. Yes, it's a shame, and in fact, these people are a disgrace to Islam. But what does that have to do with Islam? The problem isn't because of Islam, it's because of the Muslims that aren't following Islam. No country that truly practices the real teachings of Islam would run or even look like as it is today. If anyone were to ask me which country follows a good example of the teachings of Islam. I would say NONE. Learn to differentiate between "Islam" and "Muslims" as they are two different things. And if you think otherwise, maybe you'd like to give me evidence to all these pathetic lies about the teachings of Islam, because I for one would just love to know about these so-called "facts".

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/Kal_El Kal_El

    And you entertain me with your SHEER ignorance. Shear is a verb. If you are going to call someone a name denigrating their intelligence, it helps if you SPELL correctly.

    Now when you say the people are a disgrace to islam, to which people are you referring? The ones strapping bombs to themselves, mentally retarded people, women, and children, the ones who get rich and fat off the oil bought by the rest of the world, or the "moderates" who give zakat FAITHfully despite knowing that some of that money goes to fund violent jihad?

    I am fully aware that islam and muslim are two different things. I know full well that islam is the disease of the mind, and that muslims (most) are the victims suffering from the aforementioned affliction. Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Kal_El Kal_El

    And you entertain me with your SHEER ignorance. Shear is a verb. If you are going to call someone a name denigrating their intelligence, it helps if you SPELL correctly.

    Now when you say the people are a disgrace to islam, to which people are you referring? The ones strapping bombs to themselves, mentally retarded people, women, and children, the ones who get rich and fat off the oil bought by the rest of the world, or the "moderates" who give zakat FAITHfully despite knowing that some of that money goes to fund violent jihad? And notice that in nearly all acts of terrorism committed in the name of islam, it is not those governments you alluded to in your reply. It is the followers of Imam's who preach that islam should rule over the earth, and that it is NOT a religion of peace. For example, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khameini said just that.

    I am fully aware that islam and muslim are two different things. I know full well that islam is the disease of the mind, and that muslims (most) are the victims suffering from the aforementioned affliction. Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Kal_El Kal_El

    And you entertain me with your SHEER ignorance. Shear is a verb. If you are going to call someone a name denigrating their intelligence, it helps if you do so correctly. – http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/shear.html

    Now when you say the people are a disgrace to islam, to which people are you referring? The ones strapping bombs to themselves, mentally retarded people, women, and children, the ones who get rich and fat off the oil bought by the rest of the world, or the "moderates" who give zakat FAITHfully despite knowing that some of that money goes to fund violent jihad? And notice that in nearly all acts of terrorism committed in the name of islam, it is not those governments you alluded to in your reply. It is the followers of Imam's who preach that islam should rule over the earth, and that it is NOT a religion of peace. For example, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khameini said just that.

    I am fully aware that islam and muslim are two different things. I know full well that islam is the disease of the mind, and that muslims (most) are the victims suffering from the aforementioned affliction. Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/Kal_El Kal_El

    And you entertain me with your SHEER ignorance. Shear is a verb. If you are going to call someone a name denigrating their intelligence, it helps if you do so correctly. – http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/shear.html

    Now when you say the people are a disgrace to islam, to which people are you referring? The ones strapping bombs to themselves, mentally retarded people, women, and children, the ones who get rich and fat off the oil bought by the rest of the world, or the "moderates" who give zakat despite knowing that some of that money goes to fund violent jihad? And notice that in nearly all acts of terrorism committed in the name of islam, it is not those governments you alluded to in your reply. It is the followers of Imam's who preach that islam should rule over the earth, and that it is NOT a religion of peace. For example, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khameini said just that.

    I am fully aware that islam and muslim are two different things. I know full well that islam is the disease of the mind, and that muslims (most) are the victims suffering from the aforementioned affliction. Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool of course).
    I think if you used your brain by 3% you would know which people I inferred that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (doesn't matter who) is not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes" are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes. And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity agree).
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I informed you of the fact as you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam.

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool of course).
    I think if you used your brain by 3% you would know which people I inferred that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (doesn't matter who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes" are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes. And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity agree).
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I informed you of the fact as you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam.

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool of course).
    I think if you used your brain by 3% you would know which people I inferred that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (doesn't matter who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes. And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity agree).
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I informed you of the fact as you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam.

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool of course).
    I think if you used your brain by 3% you would know which people I inferred that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (doesn't matter who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes. And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I informed you of the fact as you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam.

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool of course).
    I think if you used your brain by 3% you would know which people I inferred that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (doesn't matter who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes. And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I informed you of the fact as you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam.

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?).
    I think if you used your brain by 3% you would know which people I inferred that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (doesn't matter who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes. And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I informed you of the fact as you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam.

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?).
    I think if you used a portion of your brain you would know which people I inferred that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (doesn't matter who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes. And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I informed you of the fact as you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam.

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?).
    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I inferred that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (doesn't matter who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes. And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I informed you of the fact as you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam.

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?).
    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I inferred that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (doesn't matter who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I informed you of the fact as you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam.

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?).
    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I inferred that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (doesn't matter who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense?

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?).
    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I inferred that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (doesn't matter who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense?

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you have given me. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?).
    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I inferred that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (doesn't matter who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense?

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you have given me. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all. Shame.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?).
    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I inferred that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (doesn't matter who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense?

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you have given me. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?)

    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I inferred that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (doesn't matter who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense?

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you have given me. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?)

    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I was inferring to that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (regardless of who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense?

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you have given me. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?)

    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I was inferring to that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (regardless of who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense?

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove to me something, you might as well do it right. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you provided me with. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?)

    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I was inferring to that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (regardless of who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense?

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove something to me, you might as well do it right. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you provided me with. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?)

    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I was inferring to that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (regardless of who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense? Or do you constantly find a way to change the subject by not sticking to the point as so many others have?

    And FYI, you spelled "interchangeable" wrong. At least if you're going to prove something to me, you might as well do it right. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you provided me with. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?)

    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I was inferring to that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (regardless of who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense? Or do you constantly find a way to change the subject by not sticking to the point as so many others have?

    And FYI, you spelled "INTERCHANGEABLE" wrong. I'm not aware of any "interchangable" in the dictionary. At least if you're going to prove something to me, you might as well do it right. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you provided me with. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?)

    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I was inferring to that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (regardless of who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense? Or do you constantly find a way to change the subject by not sticking to the point as so many others have?

    And FYI, you spelled "INTERCHANGEABLE" wrong. At least if you're going to prove something to me, you might as well do it right. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you provided me with. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?)

    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I was inferring to that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (regardless of who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense? Or do you constantly find a way to change the subject by not sticking to the point as so many others have?

    And FYI, you wrote in your last sentence: "…where interchangable". That's TWO MISTAKES in ONE sentence. It's not "WHERE", it's "WERE" and it's not "INTERCHANGABLE", it's "INTERCHANGEABLE". Looks like someone just get SERVED! At least if you're going to prove something to me, you might as well do it right. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you provided me with. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?)

    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I was inferring to that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (regardless of who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense? Or do you constantly find a way to change the subject by not sticking to the point as so many others have?

    And FYI, you wrote in your last sentence: "…where interchangable". That's TWO MISTAKES in ONE sentence. It's not "WHERE", it's "WERE" and it's not "INTERCHANGABLE", it's "INTERCHANGEABLE". Looks like someone just get SERVED! At least if you're going to prove something to me, you might as well do it right. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you provided me with. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?)

    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I was inferring to that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (regardless of who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense? Or do you constantly find a way to change the subject by not sticking to the point as so many others have?

    And FYI, you wrote in your last sentence: "…where interchangable".
    That's TWO MISTAKES in ONE sentence. It's not "WHERE", it's "WERE" and it's not "INTERCHANGABLE", it's "INTERCHANGEABLE". Looks like someone just get SERVED!
    Don't you just hate it when that happens?At least if you're going to prove something to me, you might as well do it right. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you provided me with. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you DEFINITELY won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?)

    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I was inferring to that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (regardless of who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because those people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense? Or do you constantly find a way to change the subject by not sticking to the point as so many others have?

    And FYI, you wrote in your last sentence: "…where interchangable".
    That's TWO MISTAKES in ONE sentence. It's not "WHERE", it's "WERE" and it's not "INTERCHANGABLE", it's "INTERCHANGEABLE". Looks like someone just get SERVED!
    Don't you just hate it when that happens? At least if you're going to prove me wrong, you might as well do it without making yourself look like a complete idiot. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you provided me with. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you DEFINITELY won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?)

    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I was inferring to that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (regardless of who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.
    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense? Or do you constantly find a way to change the subject by not sticking to the point as so many others have?

    And FYI, you wrote in your last sentence: "…where interchangable".
    That's TWO MISTAKES in ONE sentence. It's not "WHERE", it's "WERE" and it's not "INTERCHANGABLE", it's "INTERCHANGEABLE". Looks like someone just get SERVED!
    Don't you just hate it when that happens? At least if you're going to prove me wrong, you might as well do it without making yourself look like a complete idiot. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you provided me with. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you DEFINITELY won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://www.intensedebate.com/people/xkon xkon

    Good for you Kal El! It's wonderful you can pick up someone's grammar/spelling mistakes on the spot. Ever considered a teaching career? (Preschool maybe?)

    I think if you used even a portion of your brain you would know which people I was inferring to that were a disgrace to Islam. I think I made it clear that those who do NOT follow the teachings of Islam (regardless of who) are not a good example of Muslims. And by the way, Muslims that fight for their rights (even if it's fighting those U.S. "heroes") are defending their own country. To you a hero is someone and to Muslims a hero is another. To you a terrorist is someone and to Muslims a terrorist is another. In the eyes of Palestine, the terrorists are those who abolished them from their homes, destructed their lives, and caged them like animals. But of course to you those Israeli soldiers are "heroes". And it really doesn't matter if you agree or not because people of different faiths (including Judaism and Christianity) agree to that very well.

    "Can you please show me where I have ever said islam and muslims where interchangable, so I can correct myself?" Oh, and where did I say that you have said that? I was informing you of the facts simply because you were giving me examples of Muslim countries who do not follow the teachings of Islam. Do you not even TRY to admit you don't make sense? Or do you constantly find a way to change the subject by not sticking to the point as so many others have?

    And FYI, you wrote in your last sentence: "…where interchangable".
    That's TWO MISTAKES in ONE sentence. It's not "WHERE", it's "WERE" and it's not "INTERCHANGABLE", it's "INTERCHANGEABLE". Looks like someone just get SERVED!
    Don't you just hate it when that happens? At least if you're going to prove me wrong, you might as well do it without making yourself look like a complete idiot. Remind me to send you a link for an online dictionary and not an imaginary link such as the one you provided me with. So I take back my last statement. Looks like you DEFINITELY won't be a qualified Preschool teacher after all.

  • http://intensedebate.com/people/quagmire quagmire

    The Old Testament was passed down through several generations by way of mouth. Nothing was written down as the Hebrews were constantly being chased about or were held as slaves.

    Since it was passed down through several generations by word of mouth, certain elements of the passages were either exaggerated or discarded. According to the storytellers memory. When the passages were finally put to paper, they were not anything close to when the story was first told.

    The Hebrew Bible was composed and compiled between the 12th and the 2nd century BC, before Jesus' birth. Jesus and his disciples referenced it when discussing Jesus's newer teachings, referring to it as "the law of Moses, the prophets, and the psalms … the scriptures". (Luke 24:44–45). The accounts of Jesus and his disciples are recorded in the New Testament.

    Hebrews use the Old Testament, and Christians use the New Testament.

    Christianity has moderated itself over the centuries. It has adapted to change. Unlike Islam, which is still living in the seventh century.