Britain: Publisher scraps long awaited Christian Encyclopedia for being too critical of Islam

by Infidelesto on May 14, 2009 · Comments

What more can you say about a culture which hates itself?

Source

The story begins in 2006 with a contract signed between George Thomas Kurian, an experienced encyclopedist of high repute, with the eminent English academic publishing house, Wiley-Blackwell to produce a multi-volume “Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization.”

For two years Kurian toiled at this massive task with the help of almost 400 contributors. Over and above the 4,000 entries, covering everything from Bach to Transubstantiation, the reader is introduced, according to the editor’s foreword, to a “panoptic” exploration of theology and history, but also to the influence of Christianity on civilization in all its permutations: Music, law, architecture and so forth.

Rebecca Harkin, Wiley’s religion editor, was delighted with the result of Kurian’s “tremendous undertaking” and said so to him in a rapturous e-mail. The book was scheduled for publication in 2009; early feedback posted on Amazon.com was enthusiastic. With the outlook sunny, Ms. Harkin launched her baby into the world at the November, 2008, annual meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature and the American Academy of Religion.

Then the proverbial ordure hit the fan. Four (please note: only four of many editors and the aforementioned 400 contributors) of the encyclopedia’s editorial board members wrote a litany of complaints to Harkin and Kurian.

They objected to the “highly negative, even racist characterization of Islam” in the encyclopedia’s introduction. They felt Kurian’s “malignant assumptions” did “nothing to advance scholarly understanding” and demanded Kurian modify his introduction “to remove the offence thrust at Islam and other religions and to moderate the tone of confrontation and polemic.”

Harkin immediately backpedaled from her initial approval to express concern about suddenly “contentious” and “problematic” textual items. And pretty soon, criticism was no longer a question of this or that passage — it had metastasized into disapproval of the whole shebang.

Emboldened, the few saboteurs were, according to Kurian, demanding the encyclopedia be denuded of its Christian content (remember the book’s name, the Encyclopedia of Christian Civilization). They wanted excision of entries such as: “Antichrist,” “Virgin Birth,” “Resurrection” and “Uniqueness of Christ and Christianity.”

hattip: ZIP

Related posts:

  1. Critical of Islam vs. Critical of Mormons
  2. Christianity or Islam: which is the real “religion of peace”?
  3. Egyptian Authorities starving Christian kids to force mom to convert back to islam
  4. WaPo refuses to run article “too critical of Islam”
  5. Pakistan: Mob of muslims beat a Christian who refused conversion to islam
  6. Somalia: Christian aid worker beheaded for converting from islam
  7. Slavery, Christianity and Islam
  8. Pakistan: Five muslim men kidnap a Christian girl after she refused islam and marriage
  9. Egypt: Judge Tells Of Desire To Kill Christian
  10. Pakistan: Christian journalist told to embrace islam or “face dire consequences”
Want automatic updates?
4 choices: Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or get daily email updates
  • SirWilhelm
    What about Freedom of the Press? Why not publish it and let the consumer vote with their wallets? Those that don't like what it says don't have to buy it. Those that don't like those parts, can write critiques. That's how it used to be done before these days of PC and jihad.
  • Moss
    See links under 'Censorship' at http://kwelos.tripod.com/subjects.htm
  • An American published pulped it after agreeing to publish it and then printing it just 3 months ago. The same encyclopedia. This is war on history.

    http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news...
  • JEWHAWK
    Funny,but Christians don't mind to put in their books that Tel-Aviv
    is the capital of Israel,instead of Jerusalem or that Jews killed Jesus.

    Our problem is that we don't issue FATWAS,otherwise Mel Gibson
    would be DEAD and many books with anti-Jewish /anti-Zionist content
    wouldn't be published at all.
  • Just a comment
    Why single out the Chistians?
    In Wikipedia, I read: "The Jerusalem Law states that "Jerusalem, complete and united, is the capital of Israel" and the city serves as the seat of the government, home to the President's residence, government offices, supreme court, and parliament. The United Nations and most countries do not accept the Jerusalem Law (see Kellerman 1993, p. 140) and maintain their embassies in other cities such as Tel Aviv, Ramat Gan, and Herzliya."
blog comments powered by Disqus