Comments on: Obama: US Response to 9-11 was an “act contrary to our ideals” http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/06/04/obama-us-response-to-9-11-was-an-act-contrary-to-our-ideals/ American Politics | World News | Anti-Jihad Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:35:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Storm_Rider http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/06/04/obama-us-response-to-9-11-was-an-act-contrary-to-our-ideals/comment-page-4/#comment-31216 Storm_Rider Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:43:33 +0000 http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6606#comment-31216 Gerald,<br>Better people than you have looked into this using scientific and engineering methods, not emotional responses to rumors - responses and rumors which help our enemies during war.<br><br><a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/mili...</a><br><br>I'm laughing at you because of your silly, juvenile, uninformed mind.<br><br><a href="http://www.videosift.com/video/Penn-Teller-911-Conspiracy-Theory-Bullshit" rel="nofollow">http://www.videosift.com/video/Penn-Teller-911-...</a> Gerald,
Better people than you have looked into this using scientific and engineering methods, not emotional responses to rumors – responses and rumors which help our enemies during war.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/mili...

I'm laughing at you because of your silly, juvenile, uninformed mind.

http://www.videosift.com/video/Penn-Teller-911-...

]]> By: Storm_Rider http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/06/04/obama-us-response-to-9-11-was-an-act-contrary-to-our-ideals/comment-page-4/#comment-31220 Storm_Rider Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:31:49 +0000 http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6606#comment-31220 There is an international alliance of Islamist Totalitarian Religious States, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and the former Taliban Afghanistan; and Islamic Totalitarian Fascist States, such as Iraq, Egypt, Pakistan, Libya and Indonesia; and International Islamist terror groups such as Al-Qaeda. The Islamist terror groups and nations are linked to the Islamic Fascist nations by the shared totalitarian nature of Islamic Sharia Law, which is practiced by the former openly, and by the latter in the background. This is the International Islamo-Fascist alliance, and we are engaged in World War IV. Wherever totalitarian Islamic Sharia Law rules, whether in an Islamist state or a Fascist state, we have the international enemy identified; and we are morally justified to wage war in defense of American life and liberty.<br>During World War II the United States was attacked at Pearl Harbor by Imperial Japan, which was a member of the Axis Alliance. Since Nazi Germany was part of that same alliance we were free to attack Germany before Japan or Italy because the alliance as a whole was the enemy. We ended up attacking German military forces in our first major engagement of World War II in spite of the fact that Germany did not attack the United States at Pearl Harbor; and we did so by invading Morocco where the French army and navy engaged us in sustained combat - go figure - but this is the nature of warfare between alliances of nations or groups. The totalitarian laws of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan during World War II correspond to the Totalitarian Sharia law of the Islamo-Fascist Alliance of today. Now, since Iraq was a member of the Islamo-Fascist Alliance, the United States was free to attack there after first engaging the more immediate threat of Taliban Afghanistan. <br>True, we are not at war with all of Islam; only the two-headed monster of mass-murdering Islamic terrorism and Totalitarian Islamic Sharia law and jurisprudence. Most ordinary Muslims are peace-loving, and it is immoral to hate all of them collectively; but it is equally immoral not to hate the murdering and totalitarian evil which so widely contaminates Islam. The situation today parallels that of Nazi Germany in the 1940’s. We were not at war with every ordinary German, but those ordinary Germans by and large supported the evil of Nazi Law, Nazi military force, and the Nazi S.S. and Gestapo. Most ordinary Germans during World War II were peace-loving, but they did not sufficiently stand up for peace or for human liberty; and the same can be said of ordinary Muslims today. It remains to be seen how ordinary Muslims will choose sides in World War IV. Will they side with their totalitarian clerics, terrorists and Sharia Law, or will they choose to defend the sacred rights of man: life, liberty and creative pursuit of happiness? Will ordinary Muslims choose totalitarian religious government or will they choose government which rules by consent of the governed? Ordinary Germans made the wrong choice in the last century, what about the ordinary Muslims of today? I believe the jury is still out.<br><br>September 11, 2001 was the opening act between two alliances: the American-led Alliance of Liberty vs. the Islamo-Fascist Alliance of tyranny. This war is far from over; and it has the potential for much greater evil and destruction than World War II. It is time to beat our plowshares into swords and our pruning hooks into spears; and to loose the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword – just war in defense of sacred human life and human liberty.<br> <br>You can read more about this analysis in: "World War IV, The Long Struggle Against Islamo-Fascism" by Norman Podhoretz<br> <br> <a href="http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Norman_Podhoretz" rel="nofollow">http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Norman_Podhoretz</a><br><br><a href="http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Uncommon_Knowledge_Norman_Podhoretz" rel="nofollow">http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Uncommon_Knowledge_No...</a> There is an international alliance of Islamist Totalitarian Religious States, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and the former Taliban Afghanistan; and Islamic Totalitarian Fascist States, such as Iraq, Egypt, Pakistan, Libya and Indonesia; and International Islamist terror groups such as Al-Qaeda. The Islamist terror groups and nations are linked to the Islamic Fascist nations by the shared totalitarian nature of Islamic Sharia Law, which is practiced by the former openly, and by the latter in the background. This is the International Islamo-Fascist alliance, and we are engaged in World War IV. Wherever totalitarian Islamic Sharia Law rules, whether in an Islamist state or a Fascist state, we have the international enemy identified; and we are morally justified to wage war in defense of American life and liberty.
During World War II the United States was attacked at Pearl Harbor by Imperial Japan, which was a member of the Axis Alliance. Since Nazi Germany was part of that same alliance we were free to attack Germany before Japan or Italy because the alliance as a whole was the enemy. We ended up attacking German military forces in our first major engagement of World War II in spite of the fact that Germany did not attack the United States at Pearl Harbor; and we did so by invading Morocco where the French army and navy engaged us in sustained combat – go figure – but this is the nature of warfare between alliances of nations or groups. The totalitarian laws of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan during World War II correspond to the Totalitarian Sharia law of the Islamo-Fascist Alliance of today. Now, since Iraq was a member of the Islamo-Fascist Alliance, the United States was free to attack there after first engaging the more immediate threat of Taliban Afghanistan.
True, we are not at war with all of Islam; only the two-headed monster of mass-murdering Islamic terrorism and Totalitarian Islamic Sharia law and jurisprudence. Most ordinary Muslims are peace-loving, and it is immoral to hate all of them collectively; but it is equally immoral not to hate the murdering and totalitarian evil which so widely contaminates Islam. The situation today parallels that of Nazi Germany in the 1940’s. We were not at war with every ordinary German, but those ordinary Germans by and large supported the evil of Nazi Law, Nazi military force, and the Nazi S.S. and Gestapo. Most ordinary Germans during World War II were peace-loving, but they did not sufficiently stand up for peace or for human liberty; and the same can be said of ordinary Muslims today. It remains to be seen how ordinary Muslims will choose sides in World War IV. Will they side with their totalitarian clerics, terrorists and Sharia Law, or will they choose to defend the sacred rights of man: life, liberty and creative pursuit of happiness? Will ordinary Muslims choose totalitarian religious government or will they choose government which rules by consent of the governed? Ordinary Germans made the wrong choice in the last century, what about the ordinary Muslims of today? I believe the jury is still out.

September 11, 2001 was the opening act between two alliances: the American-led Alliance of Liberty vs. the Islamo-Fascist Alliance of tyranny. This war is far from over; and it has the potential for much greater evil and destruction than World War II. It is time to beat our plowshares into swords and our pruning hooks into spears; and to loose the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword – just war in defense of sacred human life and human liberty.

You can read more about this analysis in: “World War IV, The Long Struggle Against Islamo-Fascism” by Norman Podhoretz

http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Norman_Podhoretz

http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Uncommon_Knowledge_No...

]]> By: Storm_Rider http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/06/04/obama-us-response-to-9-11-was-an-act-contrary-to-our-ideals/comment-page-4/#comment-31219 Storm_Rider Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:24:56 +0000 http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6606#comment-31219 Steve: "and went after a country that had nothign to do with 9/11"<br><br>Not true; Iraq under the arch-terrorist Saddam Hussein was not only a terror-supporting nation, Iraq was in fact a terrorist nation it's self.<br><br><a href="http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2001/09/after_911_will.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2001/09...</a><br><br><a href="http://www.husseinandterror.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.husseinandterror.com/</a><br><br><a href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/Printable.aspx?ArtId=25958" rel="nofollow">http://www.frontpagemag.com/Printable.aspx?ArtI...</a><br><br><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/</a><br><br><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/05/more_evidence_of_saddamal_qaed.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/05/mor...</a><br><br>What you and so many so-called liberals (you are no longer liberals like Thomas Jefferson, but more and more like State-worshiping Fascists or Marxists) have missed is that Iraq was part of an International anti-American Islamo-Fascist Alliance of terror groups and nations. When one member of an alliance maliciously attacks the United States we are free to wage just war in self-defense by attacking any member of the alliance or any combination of those members, and we can wage just war on our own timetable.<br><br><a href="http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Norman_Podhoretz" rel="nofollow">http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Norman_Podhoretz</a><br><br><a href="http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Uncommon_Knowledge_Norman_Podhoretz" rel="nofollow">http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Uncommon_Knowledge_No...</a> Steve: “and went after a country that had nothign to do with 9/11″

Not true; Iraq under the arch-terrorist Saddam Hussein was not only a terror-supporting nation, Iraq was in fact a terrorist nation it's self.

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2001/09...

http://www.husseinandterror.com/

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Printable.aspx?ArtI...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/05/mor...

What you and so many so-called liberals (you are no longer liberals like Thomas Jefferson, but more and more like State-worshiping Fascists or Marxists) have missed is that Iraq was part of an International anti-American Islamo-Fascist Alliance of terror groups and nations. When one member of an alliance maliciously attacks the United States we are free to wage just war in self-defense by attacking any member of the alliance or any combination of those members, and we can wage just war on our own timetable.

http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Norman_Podhoretz

http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Uncommon_Knowledge_No...

]]> By: Infidelesto http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/06/04/obama-us-response-to-9-11-was-an-act-contrary-to-our-ideals/comment-page-4/#comment-31215 Infidelesto Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:11:20 +0000 http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6606#comment-31215 I've seen all the conspiracy documentaries and they are all bullshi*t...<br><br>here's a question for you to chew on. <br><br>The people in those planes are DEAD. No one can refute that. So what happened to them? You're now forced to make up another WILD conspiracy about it. <br><br>Did the big bad illuminati controlled bilderberg, tri-lateral commission, council on foreign relations controlled by evil Boosh and Darth Cheney order the hit? <br><br>you guys crack me up. The most basic facts don't matter I guess... I've seen all the conspiracy documentaries and they are all bullshi*t…

here's a question for you to chew on.

The people in those planes are DEAD. No one can refute that. So what happened to them? You're now forced to make up another WILD conspiracy about it.

Did the big bad illuminati controlled bilderberg, tri-lateral commission, council on foreign relations controlled by evil Boosh and Darth Cheney order the hit?

you guys crack me up. The most basic facts don't matter I guess…

]]> By: Storm_Rider http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/06/04/obama-us-response-to-9-11-was-an-act-contrary-to-our-ideals/comment-page-4/#comment-31218 Storm_Rider Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:53:52 +0000 http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6606#comment-31218 Steve: " We locked up cab drivers and went after a country that had nothign to do with 9/11. And we used tourture."<br><br>I bet we locked up some cab drivers after Pearl Harbor in 1941. I have no doubt some of them needed locking up, and some needed hanging as they were enemy spies or agents.<br> <br>Waterboarding is not torture because it does no permanent harm to bodily organs or function. I believe it is immoral not to use waterboarding when other methods fail to get the information we need from our totalitarian, mass-murdering Islamist enemies. This is real torture:<br><br><a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=yes&id=20919" rel="nofollow">http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=ye...</a><br><br>American Values are stated in the Declaration of Independence: Americans value human equality under equal law (not Marxist government-enforced economic equality), and we value the sacredness of our rights to life, liberty and creative pursuit of happiness (including private property). Failure to secure our right to life, i.e.: national security and defense, is immoral; and you are therefore immoral by agitating against the natural American value of life and self-defense. Steve: ” We locked up cab drivers and went after a country that had nothign to do with 9/11. And we used tourture.”

I bet we locked up some cab drivers after Pearl Harbor in 1941. I have no doubt some of them needed locking up, and some needed hanging as they were enemy spies or agents.

Waterboarding is not torture because it does no permanent harm to bodily organs or function. I believe it is immoral not to use waterboarding when other methods fail to get the information we need from our totalitarian, mass-murdering Islamist enemies. This is real torture:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?print=ye...

American Values are stated in the Declaration of Independence: Americans value human equality under equal law (not Marxist government-enforced economic equality), and we value the sacredness of our rights to life, liberty and creative pursuit of happiness (including private property). Failure to secure our right to life, i.e.: national security and defense, is immoral; and you are therefore immoral by agitating against the natural American value of life and self-defense.

]]> By: SirWilhelm http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/06/04/obama-us-response-to-9-11-was-an-act-contrary-to-our-ideals/comment-page-4/#comment-31217 SirWilhelm Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:47:01 +0000 http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6606#comment-31217 The real problem is what he meant by "our ideals"? I think he meant HIS ideals, which apparantly you seem to share. I remember very well that after 9/11, just about the whole country was behind Bush and whatever he did to prevent another 9/11, including invading Iraq. BHO built his gampaign and continues to justify his policies based on the perception Bush was wrong, despite the mounting evidence, such as the problems with closing Gitmo and the actions of the Iranian regime, that Bush was right. And you raise the torture issue once again. The fact is we used waterboarding 3 times immediately after 9/11 to avoid another. It worked. We haven't used it since then. If it violates our ideals, why has BHO reserved the right to use it again if HE deems it necessary? I don't know what BHOs ideals are for sure, do you? I certainly wonder about what they are after his comments about us not being a Christian nation, and we could be the largest Muslim nation, and many other questionable comments and actions of his. The real problem is what he meant by “our ideals”? I think he meant HIS ideals, which apparantly you seem to share. I remember very well that after 9/11, just about the whole country was behind Bush and whatever he did to prevent another 9/11, including invading Iraq. BHO built his gampaign and continues to justify his policies based on the perception Bush was wrong, despite the mounting evidence, such as the problems with closing Gitmo and the actions of the Iranian regime, that Bush was right. And you raise the torture issue once again. The fact is we used waterboarding 3 times immediately after 9/11 to avoid another. It worked. We haven't used it since then. If it violates our ideals, why has BHO reserved the right to use it again if HE deems it necessary? I don't know what BHOs ideals are for sure, do you? I certainly wonder about what they are after his comments about us not being a Christian nation, and we could be the largest Muslim nation, and many other questionable comments and actions of his.

]]> By: Storm_Rider http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/06/04/obama-us-response-to-9-11-was-an-act-contrary-to-our-ideals/comment-page-4/#comment-23849 Storm_Rider Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:43:33 +0000 http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6606#comment-23849 Gerald,<br>Better people than you have looked into this using scientific and engineering methods, not emotional responses to rumors - responses and rumors which help our enemies during war.<br><br><a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/mili...</a><br><br>I'm laughing at you because of your silly, juvenile, uninformed mind.<br><br><a href="http://www.videosift.com/video/Penn-Teller-911-Conspiracy-Theory-Bullshit" rel="nofollow">http://www.videosift.com/video/Penn-Teller-911-...</a> Gerald,
Better people than you have looked into this using scientific and engineering methods, not emotional responses to rumors – responses and rumors which help our enemies during war.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/mili...

I'm laughing at you because of your silly, juvenile, uninformed mind.

http://www.videosift.com/video/Penn-Teller-911-...

]]> By: Storm_Rider http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/06/04/obama-us-response-to-9-11-was-an-act-contrary-to-our-ideals/comment-page-4/#comment-23848 Storm_Rider Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:31:49 +0000 http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6606#comment-23848 There is an international alliance of Islamist Totalitarian Religious States, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and the former Taliban Afghanistan; and Islamic Totalitarian Fascist States, such as Iraq, Egypt, Pakistan, Libya and Indonesia; and International Islamist terror groups such as Al-Qaeda. The Islamist terror groups and nations are linked to the Islamic Fascist nations by the shared totalitarian nature of Islamic Sharia Law, which is practiced by the former openly, and by the latter in the background. This is the International Islamo-Fascist alliance, and we are engaged in World War IV. Wherever totalitarian Islamic Sharia Law rules, whether in an Islamist state or a Fascist state, we have the international enemy identified; and we are morally justified to wage war in defense of American life and liberty.<br>During World War II the United States was attacked at Pearl Harbor by Imperial Japan, which was a member of the Axis Alliance. Since Nazi Germany was part of that same alliance we were free to attack Germany before Japan or Italy because the alliance as a whole was the enemy. We ended up attacking German military forces in our first major engagement of World War II in spite of the fact that Germany did not attack the United States at Pearl Harbor; and we did so by invading Morocco where the French army and navy engaged us in sustained combat - go figure - but this is the nature of warfare between alliances of nations or groups. The totalitarian laws of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan during World War II correspond to the Totalitarian Sharia law of the Islamo-Fascist Alliance of today. Now, since Iraq was a member of the Islamo-Fascist Alliance, the United States was free to attack there after first engaging the more immediate threat of Taliban Afghanistan. <br>True, we are not at war with all of Islam; only the two-headed monster of mass-murdering Islamic terrorism and Totalitarian Islamic Sharia law and jurisprudence. Most ordinary Muslims are peace-loving, and it is immoral to hate all of them collectively; but it is equally immoral not to hate the murdering and totalitarian evil which so widely contaminates Islam. The situation today parallels that of Nazi Germany in the 1940’s. We were not at war with every ordinary German, but those ordinary Germans by and large supported the evil of Nazi Law, Nazi military force, and the Nazi S.S. and Gestapo. Most ordinary Germans during World War II were peace-loving, but they did not sufficiently stand up for peace or for human liberty; and the same can be said of ordinary Muslims today. It remains to be seen how ordinary Muslims will choose sides in World War IV. Will they side with their totalitarian clerics, terrorists and Sharia Law, or will they choose to defend the sacred rights of man: life, liberty and creative pursuit of happiness? Will ordinary Muslims choose totalitarian religious government or will they choose government which rules by consent of the governed? Ordinary Germans made the wrong choice in the last century, what about the ordinary Muslims of today? I believe the jury is still out.<br><br>September 11, 2001 was the opening act between two alliances: the American-led Alliance of Liberty vs. the Islamo-Fascist Alliance of tyranny. This war is far from over; and it has the potential for much greater evil and destruction than World War II. It is time to beat our plowshares into swords and our pruning hooks into spears; and to loose the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword – just war in defense of sacred human life and human liberty.<br> <br>You can read more about this analysis in: "World War IV, The Long Struggle Against Islamo-Fascism" by Norman Podhoretz<br> <br> <a href="http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Norman_Podhoretz" rel="nofollow">http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Norman_Podhoretz</a><br><br><a href="http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Uncommon_Knowledge_Norman_Podhoretz" rel="nofollow">http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Uncommon_Knowledge_No...</a> There is an international alliance of Islamist Totalitarian Religious States, such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and the former Taliban Afghanistan; and Islamic Totalitarian Fascist States, such as Iraq, Egypt, Pakistan, Libya and Indonesia; and International Islamist terror groups such as Al-Qaeda. The Islamist terror groups and nations are linked to the Islamic Fascist nations by the shared totalitarian nature of Islamic Sharia Law, which is practiced by the former openly, and by the latter in the background. This is the International Islamo-Fascist alliance, and we are engaged in World War IV. Wherever totalitarian Islamic Sharia Law rules, whether in an Islamist state or a Fascist state, we have the international enemy identified; and we are morally justified to wage war in defense of American life and liberty.
During World War II the United States was attacked at Pearl Harbor by Imperial Japan, which was a member of the Axis Alliance. Since Nazi Germany was part of that same alliance we were free to attack Germany before Japan or Italy because the alliance as a whole was the enemy. We ended up attacking German military forces in our first major engagement of World War II in spite of the fact that Germany did not attack the United States at Pearl Harbor; and we did so by invading Morocco where the French army and navy engaged us in sustained combat – go figure – but this is the nature of warfare between alliances of nations or groups. The totalitarian laws of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan during World War II correspond to the Totalitarian Sharia law of the Islamo-Fascist Alliance of today. Now, since Iraq was a member of the Islamo-Fascist Alliance, the United States was free to attack there after first engaging the more immediate threat of Taliban Afghanistan.
True, we are not at war with all of Islam; only the two-headed monster of mass-murdering Islamic terrorism and Totalitarian Islamic Sharia law and jurisprudence. Most ordinary Muslims are peace-loving, and it is immoral to hate all of them collectively; but it is equally immoral not to hate the murdering and totalitarian evil which so widely contaminates Islam. The situation today parallels that of Nazi Germany in the 1940’s. We were not at war with every ordinary German, but those ordinary Germans by and large supported the evil of Nazi Law, Nazi military force, and the Nazi S.S. and Gestapo. Most ordinary Germans during World War II were peace-loving, but they did not sufficiently stand up for peace or for human liberty; and the same can be said of ordinary Muslims today. It remains to be seen how ordinary Muslims will choose sides in World War IV. Will they side with their totalitarian clerics, terrorists and Sharia Law, or will they choose to defend the sacred rights of man: life, liberty and creative pursuit of happiness? Will ordinary Muslims choose totalitarian religious government or will they choose government which rules by consent of the governed? Ordinary Germans made the wrong choice in the last century, what about the ordinary Muslims of today? I believe the jury is still out.

September 11, 2001 was the opening act between two alliances: the American-led Alliance of Liberty vs. the Islamo-Fascist Alliance of tyranny. This war is far from over; and it has the potential for much greater evil and destruction than World War II. It is time to beat our plowshares into swords and our pruning hooks into spears; and to loose the fateful lightning of His terrible swift sword – just war in defense of sacred human life and human liberty.

You can read more about this analysis in: “World War IV, The Long Struggle Against Islamo-Fascism” by Norman Podhoretz

http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Norman_Podhoretz

http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Uncommon_Knowledge_No...

]]> By: Storm_Rider http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/06/04/obama-us-response-to-9-11-was-an-act-contrary-to-our-ideals/comment-page-3/#comment-23847 Storm_Rider Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:24:56 +0000 http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6606#comment-23847 Steve: "and went after a country that had nothign to do with 9/11"<br><br>Not true; Iraq under the arch-terrorist Saddam Hussein was not only a terror-supporting nation, Iraq was in fact a terrorist nation it's self.<br><br><a href="http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2001/09/after_911_will.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2001/09...</a><br><br><a href="http://www.husseinandterror.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.husseinandterror.com/</a><br><br><a href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/Printable.aspx?ArtId=25958" rel="nofollow">http://www.frontpagemag.com/Printable.aspx?ArtI...</a><br><br><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/</a><br><br><a href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/05/more_evidence_of_saddamal_qaed.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/05/mor...</a><br><br>What you and so many so-called liberals (you are no longer liberals like Thomas Jefferson, but more and more like State-worshiping Fascists or Marxists) have missed is that Iraq was part of an International anti-American Islamo-Fascist Alliance of terror groups and nations. When one member of an alliance maliciously attacks the United States we are free to wage just war in self-defense by attacking any member of the alliance or any combination of those members, and we can wage just war on our own timetable.<br><br><a href="http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Norman_Podhoretz" rel="nofollow">http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Norman_Podhoretz</a><br><br><a href="http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Uncommon_Knowledge_Norman_Podhoretz" rel="nofollow">http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Uncommon_Knowledge_No...</a> Steve: “and went after a country that had nothign to do with 9/11″

Not true; Iraq under the arch-terrorist Saddam Hussein was not only a terror-supporting nation, Iraq was in fact a terrorist nation it's self.

http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2001/09...

http://www.husseinandterror.com/

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Printable.aspx?ArtI...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334/

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/05/mor...

What you and so many so-called liberals (you are no longer liberals like Thomas Jefferson, but more and more like State-worshiping Fascists or Marxists) have missed is that Iraq was part of an International anti-American Islamo-Fascist Alliance of terror groups and nations. When one member of an alliance maliciously attacks the United States we are free to wage just war in self-defense by attacking any member of the alliance or any combination of those members, and we can wage just war on our own timetable.

http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Norman_Podhoretz

http://fora.tv/2007/11/30/Uncommon_Knowledge_No...

]]> By: Infidelesto http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/06/04/obama-us-response-to-9-11-was-an-act-contrary-to-our-ideals/comment-page-3/#comment-23846 Infidelesto Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:11:20 +0000 http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6606#comment-23846 I've seen all the conspiracy documentaries and they are all bullshi*t...<br><br>here's a question for you to chew on. <br><br>The people in those planes are DEAD. No one can refute that. So what happened to them? You're now forced to make up another WILD conspiracy about it. <br><br>Did the big bad illuminati controlled bilderberg, tri-lateral commission, council on foreign relations controlled by evil Boosh and Darth Cheney order the hit? <br><br>you guys crack me up. The most basic facts don't matter I guess... I've seen all the conspiracy documentaries and they are all bullshi*t…

here's a question for you to chew on.

The people in those planes are DEAD. No one can refute that. So what happened to them? You're now forced to make up another WILD conspiracy about it.

Did the big bad illuminati controlled bilderberg, tri-lateral commission, council on foreign relations controlled by evil Boosh and Darth Cheney order the hit?

you guys crack me up. The most basic facts don't matter I guess…

]]>