Dear Iranians: Don’t Count on America for help (or Any Country Led by the Left)

by Infidelesto on June 16, 2009 · Comments

An Excellent article by one of my favorite talk show hosts…I’m reposting the majority of this cause it’s so good.

prager

Dennis Prager: JewishWorldView.com

For those who look to “world opinion,” “the opinion of mankind,” or to the United Nations for moral guidance or for coming to the aid of victims of oppression, the past few days and presumably the next few days in Iran, provide yet another example of their uselessness.

A million or more Iranians are demonstrating against last Friday’s obviously stolen election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and the world — except for the lowlifes who rule places like Venezuela and Syria and who immediately sent their effusive congratulations to Ahmadinejad — is quiet. The world is “closely following the situation,” just as it followed the situations of the Jews during the Holocaust, the Ukrainians, the Chinese under Mao, the Rwandans, the Cambodians, Tibetans, and so many others.

I have long believed that the citizens of most free countries do not deserve the gift of freedom that they have. Few have any interest in promoting freedom, only in having it for themselves. Insofar as other countries are concerned what matters to most free countries, as to dictatorships, is power.

That is what America and Europe are watching — where the power in Iran will go. Whoever wins will get free America and free Europe’s respect.

Now it may be argued that if the American president speaks out in support of those demonstrating for free elections in Iran, it will be counterproductive.

How exactly? What will the unelected President Ahmadinejad and the unelected Supreme Ruler, Grand Ayatollah, the pre-medieval Ali Khamenei do? Get angry at America? Threaten to annihilate another country? Start building nuclear arms? Stone women who commit sexual sins? Hey, wait, haven’t they done all that already?

As bad as most of the world’s countries are, those led by left-wing governments are even worse when it comes to defending democracy.

A primary reason America is “waiting” and “watching” and “monitoring” while Iranians are beaten in the streets of Tehran is that the country is led by the left.

Compare the Canadian reaction, now that it has a conservative government:

On the very next day after the Iranian elections, according to CNN, “Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon told reporters in Niagara Falls, Ontario, Saturday, that Canada was ‘deeply concerned’ about allegations of voting irregularities. ‘We’re troubled by reports of intimidation of opposition candidates’ offices by security forces.’”

Even usually appeasing Germany, now led by a more conservative government, had a sharper response than America:

As reported by CNN, “German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier told ARD Sunday that the Iranian ambassador in Berlin would be summoned to explain the treatment of protesters against the result. ‘I have already prompted Iran, together with European colleagues today, to quickly shed light on what has happened there — if one can take the announced election results there seriously or not,” he added.

And Germany’s Deutsche Welle reported on Monday, June 15:

“German Chancellor Angela Merkel says she is very concerned and condemns the wave of arrests following the Iranian election.”

Now compare Labor-led Britain’s response:

As reported by CNN: “U.K. Foreign Secretary David Miliband said Saturday that the U.K. government had ‘followed carefully, and admired, the passion and debate during the Iranian election campaign. We have also heard the concerns about the counting of ballots expressed by two of the candidates. This is a matter for the Iranian authorities to address. We will continue to follow developments.’”

“This is a matter for the Iranian authorities to address.”

Surely a proud moment for Britain.

The best example comes, as it often does, from that quintessential man of the left, former President of the United States Jimmy Carter, speaking from — where else? – the Palestinian City of Ramallah: “I think this election has brought out a lot of opposition to (Ahmadinejad’s} policies in Iran, and I’m sure he’ll listen to those opinions and hopefully moderate his position.”

Not everyone on the left is “sure” that Ahmadinejad will “listen” to his opponents’ opinions. But that level of naivete regarding evil is almost exclusive to the left.

Related posts:

  1. Iran accuses US of meddling after disputed vote
  2. Brave Iranians ruin hate-U.S. fest
  3. Western human rights lobby ignoring Iranian suffering
  4. Video: ‘Death To America’
  5. Unconfirmed reports of Iranians injured in protests being kidnapped by islamist militias
  6. Israel suspects Iranians already working on nuclear warhead
  7. Iran: Ayatollah warns protesters; says “deal with it”
  8. Iran Warns of Action if Israel Attacks Nuke Sites
  9. Iranian regime denounces Oxford Scholarship honoring slain election protestor
  10. Iranians force civilian plane to land, claim it ‘violated Iranian airspace’
Want automatic updates?
4 choices: Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or get daily email updates
  • Storm_Rider
    The International Marxist Left is sympathetic to the International Islamist Right; both groups represent arbitrary law (one atheist - one religious) which does not derive from the consent of the governed. Arbitrary law by its very nature is authoritarian, and such law leads to totalitarianism. Moreover, both the Marxist Left and the Islamist Right despise the individual and his/her God-given rights to life, liberty and creative pursuit of happiness.

    Marxist Left = Islamist Right = Tyranny

    “I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.” Thomas Jefferson
  • funkybarfly
    If Obama sees nothing wrong with what is happening in Tehran at the moment and is adopting a lets wait and see approach, maybe he should just shut the fuck up about what he thinks Israel should be doing as well.
  • SirWilhelm
    Does seem like Obama is taking sides, doesn't it funky? The Muslim side? Wonder why?
  • NickBilladeau
    It is in America's diplomatic interest to show support for Mousavi and denounce A-jad. The man is dangerous. The country behind that man is dangerous.
  • JEWHAWK
    NickBilladeau,it seems that America under Bush MADE A DEAL with
    the Iranians.
    Looking at the map,one can easily understand how VULNERABLE
    American troops are due to Iranian presence at BOTH Iraq and Afghanistan's
    borders,because the Iranian "Revolutionary Guard" could (and did) send
    weaponry to KILL Americans and its allies on both conflicts.
    Iranian-made explosive devices were found in Iraq,as some Iranian agents
    infiltrated in there to wreak havoc among American and British forces.


    Obama is choosing a "stable"(?????) Iraq and Afghanistan over any Human Rights
    concerns.Maybe he thinks that if Israel attack Iran,all the hell will break lose in
    Iraq and Afghanistan,therefore he's publicly prohibiting Israel of doing "anything hasty"
    in order to not undermine the new Ribbentropp/Molotov deal.

    Israel was thrown under the bus TWICE: by Bush and Hussein.
  • NickBilladeau
    Dennis Prager is good to go. If you want to hear selective radio shows check out the American Conservative podcasts (subscribe on itunes). They often have podcasts of his shows.
  • While I am a Canadian who supports Obama and is decidedly left-wing, I agree with many points here. It is NOT okay to just sit and watch especially with so many Iranians begging - screaming - for change. Every country that stands for freedom needs to stand up and formally denounce this farce of a vote.

    And it is indeed beyond naive to think someone like Ahmadinejad will take note of the concerns of any of Iran's citizens other than those sitting in his pocket and who hold his same beliefs.

    Iran wants change and again Ahmadinejad is denying that change. The rest of the world need to step up.
  • JEWHAWK
    This sounds oddly enough as 1938.

    Today's Chamberlain lives in Washington and
    has a MUSLIM name:HUSSEIN.

    Jews are alone again.But this time,we have
    a POWERFUL STATE.

    Jewish counter-attack could be DEVASTATING,unlike
    the few Sten guns used by the Jewish fighters during the
    WWII.

    Compare President HUSSEIN with ROOSEVELT would be
    UNFAIR,for FDR had no teleprompter but gave wonderful
    speeches without it.He pratically BEGGED the Congress to
    declare war against the Axis before Pearl Harbor,to help
    Britain.
    Mr.HUSSEIN would NEVER repeat this.He'd SURRENDER.

    That's the man America ELECTED in 2008 !!!
    Thanks...
blog comments powered by Disqus