Obama Praises Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s “Deep Concerns” Over Election Results

by Infidelesto on June 16, 2009 · Comments

shameful, despicable, arrogant, pacifistic, disgusting…

Does he realize he’s talking about an Islamic theocratic dictatorship and the supreme leader of the number one state sponsor of Islamic terror who denies the Holocaust, kills Americans in Iraq, kills Israeli’s through proxy Hamas & Hezbollah,  and continually calls for the anihilation of Israel?

WTF is wrong with this guy.  dude is a total and utter disgrace to everything the Western world has ever stood for.

100 times worse than Carter ever was…

WASHINGTON -President Barack Obama says he believes supreme leader Ayatollah ali Khamenei has deep concerns about the civil unrest that has followed the hotly contested presidential election there.Obama repeated Tuesday at a news conference his “deep concerns” about the disputed balloting. He said he believes the ayatollah’s decision to order an investigation “indicates he understands the Iranian people have deep concerns.”

httip: ZIP

Related posts:

  1. Iran’s Supreme Leader on Israel: “God willing its annihilation is for sure”
  2. Iran’s Ayatollah Khamenei: “Israel a ‘Cancer”; Holocaust a “Big Lie”
  3. White House: Obama Cairo speech inspired Iranian uprising
  4. Iran: Group of powerful clerics side with opposition, call election illegitimate
  5. Iran: Ayatollah warns protesters; says “deal with it”
  6. Iran’s Supreme Leader Predicts Terrorists Will Get Nukes
  7. Iran Ayatollah: Negotiating with US “perverted and naive”
  8. Hamas Terror Leader Praises Obama
  9. Obama plans to send a letter to Iran’s Ayatollah
  10. Iran Ayatollah: Beautiful speeches will not overcome Muslim hatred of US
Want automatic updates?
4 choices: Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or get daily email updates
  • We shouldn't throw all Iranians into the same category. Many Iranians,
    especialy the young, are moving away from Ahmadinejad, the supreme
    leader, hardliners etc. The election results show domestic support for
    Ahmadinejad and his failed policies waning. It would have been a
    mistake to attack Iran millitarily, only strengthening these rulers.
    An Isreali/Palestinian two state solution, also, removing settlement
    from West Bank would do much to move whole region toward peace.
    We should incourage this movment toward change going on inside
    Iran. As far as praising the supreme leader; i'd be praising the
    people for standing up to these bogus election results.
  • JEWHAWK
    Mr.Mathews: "...removing settlement
    from West Bank would do much to move whole region toward peace"

    Israel LEFT Gaza in 2005.Removed the settlers BY FORCE from
    there.The settlers used to hire a great deal of muslim workers.
    Now,those same muslims are UNEMPLOYED,Israel has NO PEACE
    at this border with Gaza.THOUSANDS of rockets were launched against
    Israeli civillians.They still do.Almost every single day.

    If you tell me that there will be "PEACE" if Israelis do leave what you
    call "west bank",I say that you simply don't have enough knowledge
    about what muslims are capable of.

    Sir,we're NOT talking about Egypt and Jordan.What you call "palestinians"
    do not have an unified leadership,an unified army,a common policy regarding
    internal and foreign affairs...
    The very moment Israelis leave that piece of land,a CIVIL WAR between the
    SEVERAL "palestinian" factions will happen to take complete control over
    the others.As soon as the bloodshed is over,the winner will look for Iranian and
    Syrian military and economic aid,and soon enough,THOUSANDS of rockets will
    be falling over Israeli heads.THAT'S WHAT WILL HAPPEN.It doesn't take any genius
    to predict that.It's INEVITABLE.

    Your good intentions are laughable because your standards simply do not
    FIT into the Middle Eastern reality.
  • Yes, militants continued to fire crude rockets into Israel
    killing a handful of Israelis, and while that's to0 many, is
    nothing compared to the reactionary response carried out
    by the IDF on Gaza Dec, 2008. An action which killed
    1,200 palestinians, half of which were civilian. This plays
    into the militants hands, helps foster hatred and resentment
    and sets back peace process.

    The reactions to terrorists or militants, weather military or
    allowing them them to distract from the larger issues is what
    they want. Extremists on all sides will use what ever means to
    derail, distract, and sabotage anything that threatens their
    interest.

    Also, both sides used terrorist tactics during the formation
    of Israel in the late 40's. Check out One Palestine Complete, it's
    an unbiased look at, Palestine under the British mandate, and
    subsequent formation of Israel. It's a highly acclaimed book
    inside Israel, won a pulitzer.

    As far as the different sides going into civil war, that's highly speculative,
    however, has no barring on Israeli returning the land to them to sort
    out their differences.

    Iran, after these elections, is in no condition to interfere, and at any
    rate, pushing forward the peace process with Abbas is exactly the answer
    in going over the heads of those who want to interfere, be they militants,
    terrorists, heads of state, or religious extremists.

    And this Middle Eastern reality you speak of, well, the only way to
    change this "reality", is with dogged determination, hope, and a plan;
    not simply throwing your hands up in the air and saying things
    will never change, or doing the same tired things over and over.

    There is a place for the military response or action, but, it's not
    first, second, or even third. Again, some militants won't be happy
    till Israel is no more, of course you can't please them,
    but, don't fall into their trap, also keeping them in power by being
    the lion to their fox.

    I think hardliners on all sides feed off each other. If there was
    peace, they would be out of a job, or cause. Their interests
    could no longer be justified.
  • SirWilhelm
    Why do believe the land belongs to the Muslims? Becuase they conquered it in the 7th century? What difference is that from the Jews creating Israel in 48? If anyone has a prior claim to the land it's the Jews, who took it from the Canaanites at the direction of Jehovah, Allah's enemy by the way, they are not the same "god", many years before the Romans or the Muslims came along. This conflict goes back much further and the roots go much deeper than you or most people know or conceive of. The bottom line is, the Jews own what they live on because they've won every time they've had to fight for it. The most recent problems, since 48, have been the Muslim's inabilty to recognize that, and recognize Isreal's right to exist. So they use the continual pinpricks of terrorism to sting Israel into counter attacks to turn public opinion, such as yours, against Israel. It is the Muslim's who have the dogged determination to continue these actions while the Palestinian "refugees" suffer. Israel has made more than enough concessions to have obtained peace by now, it is way past time for the Muslims to recognize Israel's right to exist in order to find real solutions to the regions problems. They are the real hardliners here.
  • dunno_moire
    Barack Hussein Obama - "Blessed" (from the semitic - also a word in Hebrew) "Good" (from the Arabic) "Leaning towards" (Luo/African)

    I choose to hope his name can be interpreted as "a blessing (from God), a man bent towards (in submission to) Good".

    Then again his name COULD mean "a blessing to the elite who is crooked". He's got the choice - Kapo Dajjal or Blessing to Our Country. Will the real Mr. President please stand up.

    By the way Barack, that wasn't a fly buzzing in your ear - listen to your conscience. The fact you hear is meaningful enough.
  • For pity's sake!

    BHO is going to get a lot of people killed with this kumbaya crap.
  • Nocturnal-001
    If this statement is true then they are both traitors to our nation and its interests. More so the current president. Either that or they are flacid sissies that should be removed from office
  • Infidel_Tabatha
    Every time I assume Obama can't be more of a dhimmi, I'm proven wrong. Are there no limits to this man's foolishness, weakness, and hypocrisy?

    He's happy to come down heavy on democratic Israel as it fights for its very survival - but he'll bow and scrape before the despots and racists of this world.

    He can call himself a Christian all he likes - he might as well be an Islamic extremist.

    Great post guys - thanks :)
  • JEWHAWK
    Tabatha,have you heard the latest Reverend Wright's remarks about Jews
    and Zionists?
    Yep.
    That's the man whom Mr.HUSSEIN called his MENTOR.


    See that link:

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/10/wrig...
  • Infidel_Tabatha
    Hey JEWHAWK :)

    Many thanks for the link. Yep, I read about those comments by racist Wright. Can you imagine all the spite and rubbish that man has been sharing with Obama over the years? If Obama didn't agree with the basic sentiments, he'd have rejected Wright years ago.

    Add that to Obama's abandonment of Israel and it's pretty obvious that Obama's administration will be lethal for the Jewish nation.
  • JEWHAWK
    Tabatha,Mr.HUSSEIN will not only abandon Israel,but use the
    Jewish State as a bargaining chip with Iran.

    Reverend Wright's deep hatred toward Jews and Israel must've
    made an indelible impression on Mr.HUSSEIN's mind throughout
    all those years of friendship.To believe the contrary is sheer naïveté.

    Israel is gonna pay dearly for that.
  • SirWilhelm
    He takes great pains over not interfering with Iran's soveriegnty, but has no trouble telling Israel they MUST stop building settlements? Do we see a double standard here? The same double standard the Muslims use towards Israel? Now he sympathises with Khamenei's "deep concerns". If BHO isn't a Muslim, the Dems aren't liberals.
  • Infidel_Tabatha
    LOL, well said Sir Wilhelm!

    I'd posted my remarks before reading yours - glad I'm not the only one reaching these conclusions. Here in the UK every time I state that Obama either is, or might as well be, a Muslim, I get horrified responses and the inevitable cry of 'islamophobia' goes up!
  • funkybarfly
    Obama's comment on the other hand indicates he takes us all for fools.The Iranian protesters can expect the same support the protesters in a certain Chinese Square received:Outrage and dismay from the peoples of free countries but precious little from it's leaders.Life goes on right?
  • Beejj
    The sole reason the Ayatollah is "deeply concerned" is because the world can better see the corruption that permeates his ramshackle country.
  • JEWHAWK
    IDIOCY CONTEST:

    Who's the most IMBECILE: DHIMMY CARTER or Barack HUSSEIN Obama?

    Today Dhimmy Carter was in Gaza to give his "support to the palestinian
    people who are starving to death" and said that he'll ask president HUSSEIN
    to erase Hamas's name off the terror organizations list!!!

    Israel is ALONE.
    America's most powerful men are a bunch of INCOMPETENTS and
    WIMPS.

    Netanyahu must ACT as the MAN OF THE HOUSE.
blog comments powered by Disqus