Britain now has 85 Sharia Courts

by Infidelesto on June 29, 2009 · Comments

illegal, but who cares? It would be racist to demand they follow the law…

britain-sharia-courts

Guardian

Dozens of sharia courts in the UK are regularly giving illegal advice on issues including marriage and divorce, a report published today claims.

Decisions concerning marriages not recognised under English law, polygamy, and disputes regarding children are being made by at least 85 sharia courts, according to the report by the thinktank Civitas.

There is no clear divide between the functions of imams and the sharia courts. An imam who conducts a marriage which is not registered and then advises on disputes within that marriage acts in breach of the law and outside the scope of the sharia court’s role, Civitas say.

“Some of these courts are advising illegal actions,” said Denis MacEoin, a former lecturer in Arabic and Islamic studies who wrote the report. “And others transgress human rights standards.”

Muslim arbitration tribunal (MTA), a network of sharia courts, has been operating in London, Manchester, Bradford, Birmingham and Nuneaton since 2007 under the 1996 Arbitration Act. These make decisions that are legally binding and can be enforced by the English courts, provided they do not conflict with English law and both parties choose to use them.

An MTA spokeswoman said that critics of any use of Islamic law failed to recognise that both parties had to agree to any form of dispute resolution in Britain.

“The establishment of Muslim Arbitration Tribunals is an important and significant step towards providing the Muslim community with a real opportunity to self determine disputes in accordance with Islamic sacred law,” a statement from the organisation said.

But today’s report claims that many smaller and often informal courts are making decisions under sharia law beyond their legal remit.

About two-thirds of Muslim marriages are not being registered under the Marriages Act, which is illegal,” said Neil Addison, a barrister specialising in the law on religion. “A woman with such a marriage would have no choice but to go to a sharia tribunal … But it’s not the way arbitration is supposed to work.”

MacEoin said: “By demanding marriage under Muslim law, the divorce is determined by the man saying ‘I divorce you’ three times. Divorce under Islamic law also affects the wife’s entitlement to alimony, custody of children, and who keeps the family house. These will all be decided by sharia law and will be discriminatory towards the woman in all cases.”

hattip: Sweetness & Light

Related posts:

  1. Islamic sharia courts in Britain are now ‘legally binding’
  2. UK:Govt Gives Stamp of Approval to Chain of Sharia Courts
  3. Sharia courts rule on sex lives in Britain
  4. We want to offer sharia law to Britain
  5. UK Sharia courts put women in their place
  6. Top UK Judge: Sharia law SHOULD be used in Britain
  7. EU judges want Sharia law applied in British courts
  8. Sharia Courts Popping Up All Around Britain
  9. Muslim women oppose Sharia councils in Britain
  10. La Times: Islamic Law already recognizd in British courts
Want automatic updates?
4 choices: Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or get daily email updates
  • funkybarfly
    85 sharia courts.
    It isn't surprising as they are closing in on building their 700th mosque.
    As "Bones" McCoy might say:"It's life,Jim... but not as we know it"
    Britain(the island)becoming part of Eurabia,nothing more,nothing less.
    C'est la vie.
  • TT
    This is absolutely wrong. The main principle of all modern State, that is, the equality of the citizens before the Law, is actually broken thanks to this kind of decisions.
    At least in Britain there are people investigating this...
  • Storm_Rider
    British Marxists don't believe in equality under law, they believe in government enforced economic equality for all serfs.
  • JEWHAWK
    Tabatha,even the majority of Jews wouldn't accept to be ruled by Halachic
    Laws.I would solemnly IGNORE it.
    Jews can do just that;We don't issue deadly "fatwas" against those who don't
    agree with us.As the old saying goes,if you put ten Jews in a room,you're
    gonna get ELEVEN different opinions on the same subject.It's a Jewish trait
    to engage in debate,being right or wrong.Jews can't live in dictatorships...

    Muslims don't.A "fatwa" is a DEATH SENTENCE.Period.A Sharia Court
    ruling should be obeyed or else.

    BUT...

    A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY such as Britain allowing this ALIEN BODY
    besmirch the local law is TOO MUCH.Muslims that are willing to follow
    that backward Sharia Law should GET THE HELL OUT of the country
    and make their way BACK to the sewers they came from.

    Britain will pay dearly for letting that happen.It's utterly reckless,
    it's more like suicidal behaviour.
  • Infidel_Tabatha
    Can you imagine if Jews or Christians had religious courts that authorised, to give an example, paying thousands of pounds to victims of Jewish/Christian violence...?

    I'm sure we can all imagine the outcry. Christians would be lambasted no end. Jews - well, the slurs that would fly...

    Yet when Muslim Sharia courts do it, that's fine...

    Dhimmiland UK - where nothing surprises me any more.
  • SirWilhelm
    You can't concede anything to Muslims or they take advantage of it, then make more demands. Another example of their strategy of conversion by any means.
blog comments powered by Disqus