What a jerk…After all the blood, sweat and tears we’ve shed for his people. After bailing his ass out of complete disaster in a post Saddam Iraq, he makes a statement and says nothing of the US Military’s involvement during this process.
NY Times – In the past few weeks, nationalist sentiments have spread within the Iraqi government and military, with officials all but boasting that Iraq is ready to handle the security situation on its own.
Speaking as a military parade marking the event was held deep inside the heavily fortified Green Zone, Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki said, “The national united government succeeded in putting down the sectarian war that was threatening the unity and the sovereignty of Iraq.”
He made no mention of the American military’s involvement in fighting here for the last six years, and more than 120,000 American troops remain on Iraqi soil. There were no official documents signed between the countries and no handover of authority on Tuesday. June 30 was the date set in an Iraqi-American security agreement that went into effect on Jan. 1.
Many ordinary Iraqis said that a day they long doubted would come seemed to have arrived. Although some worried that the security forces may not be able to control the insurgency, they were also relieved to have the Americans out of sight. Some said they believed that the American presence had given insurgents a pretext to stage attacks.
Related posts:
- US Military: Iraq forces could control all provinces this year
- Iraqi President Maliki: Al Qaeda no longer poses a threat to Iraq
- Deal would have U.S. troops out of Iraq by 2012
- Pope to Maliki: “Protect Iraqi Christians”
- Iraq: US deaths at all time low; Australia pulls out
- US Military Shoots Down Iranian UAV in Iraq
- Iraq: in one year, victims of attacks down by 75%
- US planning military base on Iraq-Iran border
- Polish troops begin drawdown in Iraq
- Misunderstander of the Religion of Peace™ kills 25 at Iraq peace conference
