<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China: 156 killed after Muslim Uigurs revolt against Chinese Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/07/07/china-156-killed-after-muslim-uigurs-revolt-against-chinese-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/07/07/china-156-killed-after-muslim-uigurs-revolt-against-chinese-government/</link>
	<description>American Politics &#124; World News &#124; Anti-Jihad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:45:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SirWilhelm</title>
		<link>http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/07/07/china-156-killed-after-muslim-uigurs-revolt-against-chinese-government/comment-page-2/#comment-31012</link>
		<dc:creator>SirWilhelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6978#comment-31012</guid>
		<description>Please notice, I mentioned the Han Chinese civilians, I did not defend the Chinese Communists or their govt. I agree they are totalitarian and oppressive in their own way. Then again, you did not pick up on the part of the article where the Uighar claim of occupation is disputed by the Han Chinese who came there with the expertise to make use of the resources available that the Uighars lacked. The Han can&#039;t understand why the Uighars don&#039;t appreciate the advances they have made in the economy and living standards which clash with the Uighars MUSLIM culture and beliefs. This is where Muslims clash with all other cultures, beliefs and governments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not English, although I have some English blood in me, as well as German, French, Dutch, Scotch and Irish, and my children have a bit of Seneca Indian in them from their mother&#039;s side. My username is from fantasy role-playing which I came to like and use in a lot of other places.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, I know England&#039;s history well and am particularly familiar with the period of Rome&#039;s fall and it&#039;s impact in England and I don&#039;t see your point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please notice, I mentioned the Han Chinese civilians, I did not defend the Chinese Communists or their govt. I agree they are totalitarian and oppressive in their own way. Then again, you did not pick up on the part of the article where the Uighar claim of occupation is disputed by the Han Chinese who came there with the expertise to make use of the resources available that the Uighars lacked. The Han can&#39;t understand why the Uighars don&#39;t appreciate the advances they have made in the economy and living standards which clash with the Uighars MUSLIM culture and beliefs. This is where Muslims clash with all other cultures, beliefs and governments.</p>
<p>I am not English, although I have some English blood in me, as well as German, French, Dutch, Scotch and Irish, and my children have a bit of Seneca Indian in them from their mother&#39;s side. My username is from fantasy role-playing which I came to like and use in a lot of other places.</p>
<p>Yes, I know England&#39;s history well and am particularly familiar with the period of Rome&#39;s fall and it&#39;s impact in England and I don&#39;t see your point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SirWilhelm</title>
		<link>http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/07/07/china-156-killed-after-muslim-uigurs-revolt-against-chinese-government/comment-page-2/#comment-24552</link>
		<dc:creator>SirWilhelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6978#comment-24552</guid>
		<description>Please notice, I mentioned the Han Chinese civilians, I did not defend the Chinese Communists or their govt. I agree they are totalitarian and oppressive in their own way. Then again, you did not pick up on the part of the article where their claim of occupation is disputed by the Han Chinese who came there with the expertise to make use of the resources available that the Uighars lacked. The Han can&#039;t understand why the Uighars don&#039;t appreciate the advances they have made in the economy and living standards which clash with the Uighars MUSLIM culture and beliefs. This is where Muslims clash with all other cultures, beliefs and governments.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am not English, although I have some English blood in me, as well as German, French, Dutch, Scotch and Irish, and my children have a bit of Seneca Indian in them from their mother&#039;s side. My username is from fantasy role-playing which I came to like and use in a lot of other places.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, I know England&#039;s history well and am particularly familiar with the period of Rome&#039;s fall and it&#039;s impact in England and I don&#039;t see your point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please notice, I mentioned the Han Chinese civilians, I did not defend the Chinese Communists or their govt. I agree they are totalitarian and oppressive in their own way. Then again, you did not pick up on the part of the article where their claim of occupation is disputed by the Han Chinese who came there with the expertise to make use of the resources available that the Uighars lacked. The Han can&#39;t understand why the Uighars don&#39;t appreciate the advances they have made in the economy and living standards which clash with the Uighars MUSLIM culture and beliefs. This is where Muslims clash with all other cultures, beliefs and governments.</p>
<p>I am not English, although I have some English blood in me, as well as German, French, Dutch, Scotch and Irish, and my children have a bit of Seneca Indian in them from their mother&#39;s side. My username is from fantasy role-playing which I came to like and use in a lot of other places.</p>
<p>Yes, I know England&#39;s history well and am particularly familiar with the period of Rome&#39;s fall and it&#39;s impact in England and I don&#39;t see your point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storm_Rider</title>
		<link>http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/07/07/china-156-killed-after-muslim-uigurs-revolt-against-chinese-government/comment-page-2/#comment-24513</link>
		<dc:creator>Storm_Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6978#comment-24513</guid>
		<description>magiaghaee:  “the American Declaration of Independence was written by a bunch of slaveholders. Don&#039;t wave it like the biblem its not an infallible document.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What part of “We hold these truths to be self-evident , that all men are created equal” is infallible?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What part of “That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” is infallible?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What part of “That to secure these rights government are created among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” is infallible?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many of our American Founding Fathers were not slaveholders; and even though Thomas Jefferson owned slaves, he was instrumental in outlawing the slave trade, and he began freeing his slaves but died before he finished. Slavery in the New World was not an American enterprise; it was European:  French, British, Dutch, Spanish, etc. etc. Thomas Jefferson was born into a world of European-developed slavery; and the Muslim world was an essential ingredient in the enterprise as they were already culling African slaves and selling for profit to the Europeans. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“Slavery was practiced in Africa before the beginning of the Atlantic slave trade. Slavery and the slave trade were an integral part of African societies and states which supplied the Arab world with enslaved people for centuries before the arrival of the Europeans…The African continent was bled of its human resources via all possible routes; across the Sahara, through the Red Sea, from the Indian Ocean ports and across the Atlantic. At least ten centuries of slavery for the benefit of the Muslim countries (from the ninth to the nineteenth). ... Four million enslaved people exported via the Red Sea, another four million through the Swahili ports of the Indian Ocean, perhaps as many as nine million along the trans-Saharan caravan route, and eleven to twenty million (depending on the author) across the Atlantic Ocean.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“As the French empire in North America grew, the French also began to build a smaller but more profitable empire in the West Indies. Settlement along the South American coast in what is today French Guiana began in 1624, and a colony was founded on Saint Kitts in 1625 ...The Compagnie des eacute;les de l&#039;Amérique founded colonies in Guadeloupe and Martinique in 1635, and a colony was later founded on Saint Lucia by (1650). The food-producing plantations of these colonies were built and sustained through slavery, with the supply of slaves dependent on the African slave trade.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_North_Africa&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_North_Africa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“In the 18th century, France carried on two types of trade with its New World colonies. One was the direct trade by which France sent wheat, wine, metal objects, and building materials to the New World in exchange for sugar, and, to a lesser degree, cotton, cocoa, tobacco, rocou, and coffee. The other was the triangular slave trade, which the French referred to as the &quot;circuit&quot; trade. French ships loaded with trade goods sailed to Africa, where the goods were exchanged for slaves. The slaves were then taken to France&#039;s New World colonies, where they were exchanged for sugar and other plantation products.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=1587&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=1587&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The Du Bois Institute dataset lists 4,033 slaving voyages by French-registered ships destined for the Americas that sailed between 1669 and 1864. It excludes a large number of voyages whose final destination lay in the Indian Ocean.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.historycooperative.org/cgi-bin/justtop.cgi?act=justtop&amp;url=http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/wm/58.1/geggus.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.historycooperative.org/cgi-bin/justt...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“In the history of the Atlantic slave trade, the French turned four times as many Africans into slaves as the Americans did, they used them far more brutally, and French slavers not only got a head-start on Americans, they continued the slave trade--legally--until 1830, long after the rest of Europe had given it up. And they kept at it clandestinely until after the U.S. Civil War. France officially abolished slavery in its colonies only 14 years before Lincoln&#039;s Emancipation Proclamation, and then only under pressure from slave uprisings.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;• Slaver voyages: France, 4,200; British North America/United States, 1,500.&lt;br&gt;• Slaves transported: France 1,250,000, British North America/United States, 300,000.&lt;br&gt;• Slaves delivered to: French West Indies: 1,600,000, British North America/United States, 500,000.*&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://vernondent.blogspot.com/2005/05/french-slavery.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://vernondent.blogspot.com/2005/05/french-s...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;“The British transatlantic slave trade, which flourished from the mid-seventeenth century until the early nineteenth century, was a major conduit for the enforced migration of Africans to the Americas. Between 1660 and 1807 over three million Africans were dispatched to the Americas in British vessels.”&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pickeringchatto.com/major_works/the_british_transatlantic_slave_trade&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.pickeringchatto.com/major_works/the_...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;magiaghaee, you are an uninformed anti-American Islamist; or would that be Marxist? No difference in regards to destruction of human rights and anti-Americanism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>magiaghaee:  “the American Declaration of Independence was written by a bunch of slaveholders. Don&#39;t wave it like the biblem its not an infallible document.”</p>
<p>What part of “We hold these truths to be self-evident , that all men are created equal” is infallible?</p>
<p>What part of “That they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” is infallible?</p>
<p>What part of “That to secure these rights government are created among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” is infallible?</p>
<p>Many of our American Founding Fathers were not slaveholders; and even though Thomas Jefferson owned slaves, he was instrumental in outlawing the slave trade, and he began freeing his slaves but died before he finished. Slavery in the New World was not an American enterprise; it was European:  French, British, Dutch, Spanish, etc. etc. Thomas Jefferson was born into a world of European-developed slavery; and the Muslim world was an essential ingredient in the enterprise as they were already culling African slaves and selling for profit to the Europeans. </p>
<p>“Slavery was practiced in Africa before the beginning of the Atlantic slave trade. Slavery and the slave trade were an integral part of African societies and states which supplied the Arab world with enslaved people for centuries before the arrival of the Europeans…The African continent was bled of its human resources via all possible routes; across the Sahara, through the Red Sea, from the Indian Ocean ports and across the Atlantic. At least ten centuries of slavery for the benefit of the Muslim countries (from the ninth to the nineteenth). &#8230; Four million enslaved people exported via the Red Sea, another four million through the Swahili ports of the Indian Ocean, perhaps as many as nine million along the trans-Saharan caravan route, and eleven to twenty million (depending on the author) across the Atlantic Ocean.”</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_slave_trade</a></p>
<p>“As the French empire in North America grew, the French also began to build a smaller but more profitable empire in the West Indies. Settlement along the South American coast in what is today French Guiana began in 1624, and a colony was founded on Saint Kitts in 1625 &#8230;The Compagnie des eacute;les de l&#39;Amérique founded colonies in Guadeloupe and Martinique in 1635, and a colony was later founded on Saint Lucia by (1650). The food-producing plantations of these colonies were built and sustained through slavery, with the supply of slaves dependent on the African slave trade.”</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_North_Africa" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_North_Africa</a></p>
<p>“In the 18th century, France carried on two types of trade with its New World colonies. One was the direct trade by which France sent wheat, wine, metal objects, and building materials to the New World in exchange for sugar, and, to a lesser degree, cotton, cocoa, tobacco, rocou, and coffee. The other was the triangular slave trade, which the French referred to as the &#8220;circuit&#8221; trade. French ships loaded with trade goods sailed to Africa, where the goods were exchanged for slaves. The slaves were then taken to France&#39;s New World colonies, where they were exchanged for sugar and other plantation products.”</p>
<p><a href="http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=1587" rel="nofollow">http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=1587</a></p>
<p>“The Du Bois Institute dataset lists 4,033 slaving voyages by French-registered ships destined for the Americas that sailed between 1669 and 1864. It excludes a large number of voyages whose final destination lay in the Indian Ocean.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.historycooperative.org/cgi-bin/justtop.cgi?act=justtop&#038;url=http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/wm/58.1/geggus.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.historycooperative.org/cgi-bin/justt.." rel="nofollow">http://www.historycooperative.org/cgi-bin/justt..</a>.</p>
<p>“In the history of the Atlantic slave trade, the French turned four times as many Africans into slaves as the Americans did, they used them far more brutally, and French slavers not only got a head-start on Americans, they continued the slave trade&#8211;legally&#8211;until 1830, long after the rest of Europe had given it up. And they kept at it clandestinely until after the U.S. Civil War. France officially abolished slavery in its colonies only 14 years before Lincoln&#39;s Emancipation Proclamation, and then only under pressure from slave uprisings.”</p>
<p>• Slaver voyages: France, 4,200; British North America/United States, 1,500.<br />• Slaves transported: France 1,250,000, British North America/United States, 300,000.<br />• Slaves delivered to: French West Indies: 1,600,000, British North America/United States, 500,000.*</p>
<p><a href="http://vernondent.blogspot.com/2005/05/french-slavery.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://vernondent.blogspot.com/2005/05/french-s.." rel="nofollow">http://vernondent.blogspot.com/2005/05/french-s..</a>.</p>
<p>“The British transatlantic slave trade, which flourished from the mid-seventeenth century until the early nineteenth century, was a major conduit for the enforced migration of Africans to the Americas. Between 1660 and 1807 over three million Africans were dispatched to the Americas in British vessels.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pickeringchatto.com/major_works/the_british_transatlantic_slave_trade" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.pickeringchatto.com/major_works/the_.." rel="nofollow">http://www.pickeringchatto.com/major_works/the_..</a>.</p>
<p>magiaghaee, you are an uninformed anti-American Islamist; or would that be Marxist? No difference in regards to destruction of human rights and anti-Americanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magiaghaee</title>
		<link>http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/07/07/china-156-killed-after-muslim-uigurs-revolt-against-chinese-government/comment-page-2/#comment-24509</link>
		<dc:creator>magiaghaee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6978#comment-24509</guid>
		<description>And constantly deriding an alcoholic helps them get off the booze? I think your common sense has been adulterated by your narrow mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And constantly deriding an alcoholic helps them get off the booze? I think your common sense has been adulterated by your narrow mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storm_Rider</title>
		<link>http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/07/07/china-156-killed-after-muslim-uigurs-revolt-against-chinese-government/comment-page-2/#comment-24508</link>
		<dc:creator>Storm_Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6978#comment-24508</guid>
		<description>Blogs are created by real people who are not controlled by the Party, the Clergy or the State; real individuals who have a God-given right to free speech. Your elitist view of the individual reflects a totalitarian mind - the very linkage between Marxism and Islam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogs are created by real people who are not controlled by the Party, the Clergy or the State; real individuals who have a God-given right to free speech. Your elitist view of the individual reflects a totalitarian mind &#8211; the very linkage between Marxism and Islam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Storm_Rider</title>
		<link>http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/07/07/china-156-killed-after-muslim-uigurs-revolt-against-chinese-government/comment-page-2/#comment-24507</link>
		<dc:creator>Storm_Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6978#comment-24507</guid>
		<description>No, these Quranic verses speak for themselves and they are within context. Your Islamist mind tricks won&#039;t work here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hardcore Wahhabi Islam is the &quot;Islamic Reformation&quot;; the Reformation of Islam is not in the direction of unaleinable human rights to life, liberty and private property, nor is it in the direction of law derived from the majority within a Constitutional framework which secures those human rights. The Islamic Reformation is retrograde; it takes us back to seventh century tyranny hybridized with twentieth century totalitarianism.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=2515587181120245843&amp;ei=R7NnStO4MqDMqwLni7WaDA&amp;q=undercover+mosque&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=25155...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;magiaghaee, you are either a fool or an enemy agitator; an enemy of the United States in either case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, these Quranic verses speak for themselves and they are within context. Your Islamist mind tricks won&#39;t work here.</p>
<p>Hardcore Wahhabi Islam is the &#8220;Islamic Reformation&#8221;; the Reformation of Islam is not in the direction of unaleinable human rights to life, liberty and private property, nor is it in the direction of law derived from the majority within a Constitutional framework which secures those human rights. The Islamic Reformation is retrograde; it takes us back to seventh century tyranny hybridized with twentieth century totalitarianism.</p>
<p><a href="http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=2515587181120245843&#038;ei=R7NnStO4MqDMqwLni7WaDA&#038;q=undercover+mosque" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=25155.." rel="nofollow">http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=25155..</a>.</p>
<p>magiaghaee, you are either a fool or an enemy agitator; an enemy of the United States in either case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magiaghaee</title>
		<link>http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/07/07/china-156-killed-after-muslim-uigurs-revolt-against-chinese-government/comment-page-2/#comment-24506</link>
		<dc:creator>magiaghaee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6978#comment-24506</guid>
		<description>With that logic I guess Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Judaism have proved the same thing. Inquisition, Crusades, Sri Lanka Civil War, Israel v Judea, Palestine Mandate pre 1948 etc. Your narrow view of the world will disappoint you one day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With that logic I guess Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Judaism have proved the same thing. Inquisition, Crusades, Sri Lanka Civil War, Israel v Judea, Palestine Mandate pre 1948 etc. Your narrow view of the world will disappoint you one day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magiaghaee</title>
		<link>http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/07/07/china-156-killed-after-muslim-uigurs-revolt-against-chinese-government/comment-page-2/#comment-24504</link>
		<dc:creator>magiaghaee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6978#comment-24504</guid>
		<description>A simple look at the history of Communist China will show you how this began. With Mao&#039;s totalitarian view of a uniform society anybody who is outside the norm was persecuted. Xianjing and Tibet were the most brutal examples. The unrest in the last two years is a direct response to Chinese occupation. I assuming you are an Englishman based on your username. Do you not remember England&#039;s history with the Roman occupation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A simple look at the history of Communist China will show you how this began. With Mao&#39;s totalitarian view of a uniform society anybody who is outside the norm was persecuted. Xianjing and Tibet were the most brutal examples. The unrest in the last two years is a direct response to Chinese occupation. I assuming you are an Englishman based on your username. Do you not remember England&#39;s history with the Roman occupation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magiaghaee</title>
		<link>http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/07/07/china-156-killed-after-muslim-uigurs-revolt-against-chinese-government/comment-page-2/#comment-24503</link>
		<dc:creator>magiaghaee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6978#comment-24503</guid>
		<description>Taking Quranic verses out of context that&#039;s real smart. And by the way the American Declaration of Independence was written by a bunch of slaveholders. Don&#039;t wave it like the biblem its not an infallible document.  And muslims pay zakat and khums to the government. It&#039;s called revenues for the government. Zakat and Jizya are equivalent taxes.  Oh btw the three translations you have put up are questionable. YusufAli is a hardcore wahhabi and some of his translations are just plain stupid or literal, very reflective of the narrow minds of Wahhabis. Pickthal is basically a reprint of Yusufali. I don&#039;t know Shakir very well.  Plus this verse if I remember correctly were given at time when the pagans or their Jewish allies were attacking the Muslims. This is not cart blanche for Muslims to attack everybody. If it was Muslims all over the world would be fighting and that is not the case. You should be away that some of the Quranic verses are one time only obligations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taking Quranic verses out of context that&#39;s real smart. And by the way the American Declaration of Independence was written by a bunch of slaveholders. Don&#39;t wave it like the biblem its not an infallible document.  And muslims pay zakat and khums to the government. It&#39;s called revenues for the government. Zakat and Jizya are equivalent taxes.  Oh btw the three translations you have put up are questionable. YusufAli is a hardcore wahhabi and some of his translations are just plain stupid or literal, very reflective of the narrow minds of Wahhabis. Pickthal is basically a reprint of Yusufali. I don&#39;t know Shakir very well.  Plus this verse if I remember correctly were given at time when the pagans or their Jewish allies were attacking the Muslims. This is not cart blanche for Muslims to attack everybody. If it was Muslims all over the world would be fighting and that is not the case. You should be away that some of the Quranic verses are one time only obligations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magiaghaee</title>
		<link>http://infidelsarecool.com/2009/07/07/china-156-killed-after-muslim-uigurs-revolt-against-chinese-government/comment-page-2/#comment-24502</link>
		<dc:creator>magiaghaee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infidelsarecool.com/?p=6978#comment-24502</guid>
		<description>These are just blogs. And what you see in the Islamic world is a result of backward indigenous male chauvinist cultures. Women don&#039;t even get their Islamic rights. Do not confuse Islamic &quot;culture&quot; with Islamic theology. And you are typically quoting or bringing forth evidence from Salafists or Wahhabis which most Muslims with a decent knowledge of the Quran regard as heretics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are just blogs. And what you see in the Islamic world is a result of backward indigenous male chauvinist cultures. Women don&#39;t even get their Islamic rights. Do not confuse Islamic &#8220;culture&#8221; with Islamic theology. And you are typically quoting or bringing forth evidence from Salafists or Wahhabis which most Muslims with a decent knowledge of the Quran regard as heretics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
