Is Obama violating international law over Iran?

by Infidelesto on October 5, 2009 · Comments

So says John Bolton.  Here’s how:

Wall Street Journal

The most widely touted outcome of last week’s Geneva talks with Iran was the “agreement in principle” to send approximately one nuclear-weapon’s worth of Iran’s low enriched uranium (LEU) to Russia for enrichment to 19.75% and fabrication into fuel rods for Tehran’s research reactor. President Barack Obama says the deal represents progress, a significant confidence-building measure.

In fact, the agreement constitutes another in the long string of Iranian negotiating victories over the West. Any momentum toward stricter sanctions has been dissipated, and Iran’s fraudulent, repressive regime again hobnobs with the U.N. Security Council’s permanent members. Consider the following problems:

…The “agreement” undercuts Security Council resolutions forbidding Iranian uranium enrichment. No U.S. president has been more enamored of international law and the Security Council than Mr. Obama. Yet here he is undermining the foundation of the multilateral campaign against Tehran’s nuclear weapons program. In Resolution 1696, adopted July 31, 2006, the Security Council required Iran to “suspend all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities, including research and development.” Uranium enriched thereafter—the overwhelming bulk of Iran’s admitted LEU—thus violates 1696 and later sanctions resolutions. Moreover, considering Iran’s utter lack of credibility, we have no idea whether its declared LEU constitutes anything near its entire stockpile.

By endorsing Iran’s use of its illegitimately enriched uranium, Mr. Obama weakens his argument that Iran must comply with its “international obligations.”

Related posts:

  1. UN has epiphany: Says Iran ignoring demands to stop nuke work
  2. Israel demands immediate embargo on Iran oil
  3. Iran delivers “punch”; claims first batch of 20 percent enriched uranium
  4. Yawn: UN imposes New sanctions on Iran
  5. Iran hints at possible uranium enrichment halt, if it gets guarantees
  6. Iran holds enough uranium for bomb
  7. Iran: Country ready to offer new nuclear package to West
  8. Tehran “still refusing to suspend uranium enrichment”
  9. UN To Impose ‘Sanctions’ On Iran *UPDATED* (scroll for updates)
  10. Decision time: Iran has crossed the “Red line”
Want automatic updates?
4 choices: Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or get daily email updates
  • veteranoutrage
    www.veteranoutrage.com

    Of course obama and the democrats violated yet another useless un law..

    Because they all know the un is useless anyway
    So its not like the un could actually enforce something anyway
    obama and the dumb ass democrats will ue the useless un
    to cover for their own failures and lack of spine in dealing with a known islamic terrorists regime..
  • SirWilhelm
    As usual, the hypocritical liberals only pay attention to the laws they find convenient, and ignore those they find inconvenient. This is true at any level of the law, including international. Since so many national governments are socialist, i. e.: liberal, it's the norm on the international level, which is why the UN is practically impotent, and always will be. But yes, Obama and the Dems do turn to the UN when they can't get their way in the US, and will try to trump our Constitution with UN and international law. It remains to be seen if their lack of spine in dealing with terrorists is due to their fears, or their hidden sympathies towards them.
blog comments powered by Disqus