Comments on: Strategic Questions Surround the Coming Iran Strike

By: Top Dog

Top Dog — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 09:13:07 +0000

Because Obama is not only non-supportive of Israel, but seemingly actively anti-Semetic, any defensive preemptive strike by Israel will have to be absolutely decisive. IMHO, there is only one way to achieve this:

Nuke Iran.

By: Top Dog

Top Dog — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 03:13:07 +0000

Nuke Iran.

By: joesix_pack

joesix_pack — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:34:50 +0000

I have to agree in that President Obama would not take an active part on Israel's side. In fact, I would expect him to be opposed in almost every way. He is no friend of Israel. I would not put it past him to order Israeli aircraft shot down if they were in Iraqi airspace.

By: JEWHAWK

JEWHAWK — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:54:08 +0000

"The great untold story of the Yom Kippur War of 1973 was President Nixon turning on the spigot of U.S. military aid to make sure Israel survived"

Sure.That's why Nixon/Kissinger duo did NOT warn Israel in time to call its reservists...
Israel was caught off guard because of that "little" detail.

The ONLY American we,Jews and Israelis should thank for Israel's ultimate victory in
1973 is General ALEXANDER HAIG,who provided the TOW anti-tank missiles for Israel.

It was a GAME-CHANGER weapon.The Israeli A-4 Skyhawks and F-4 Phantoms were shot down
like flies by the laterst Soviet SAM (Surface-Air Missiles) installed AND operated by Soviet
crews.
Only when those Anti-Aircraft weapons were out of range,Israeli aircraft could strike the enemy's
positions on the ground.

In other words,both Nixon and self-hating Jew Kissinger were trying to see Israel defeated,if not
militarly at least morally.Their whim rendered thousands of lives in Israel.

"The U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor, the world’s best fighter, will be needed and can make a huge difference."

The F-15E's already could do the job.What would make a HUGE difference is to deliver FOUR Virginia Class
submarines to Israel AND,of course,its TOMAHAWAK missiles that were VETOED to be sold to Israel.
Each submarine costs about 2 Billion Dollars.

By: Tonto

Tonto — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:54:22 +0000

If Russia does re-equip Iran it will come with a big fat price tag that the Iranians will not be able to afford. Russia always wants “Cash, no checks”. If Israel does the job right, they'll take out oil reserves, gas reserves, the one and only refinery in Iran, the nuke installations and put Iran in a very nasty position of near bankruptcy. Iran talks boocoo smack, but Saddam fought them to a standstill for 8 years….and the US whipped Saddam in HOURS….I think the Israelis best just get to it and let the chips fall….the muz are MUCH more talk than ass. The Iranians have been spending money like sailors on liberty trying to finance all the terror groups all around, buying half the gas they use and buying nuke -making equipment. They're closer to broke that most people think….and basically windbags. Secretly the rest of the M/E will be breathing a sigh of relief….all the while screaming bloody murder and calling Israel nasty names. Well, if I was Israeli, I'd just haul off and try to give a shit.

By: Infidelesto

Infidelesto — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:11:06 +0000

Agreed. The only way I think Obama does anything is if the pressure both at home and internationally becomes so great, that he ends up aiding Israel “in some capacity” out of political expedience.

By: psudrozz

psudrozz — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:58:33 +0000

"The great untold story of the Yom Kippur War of 1973 was President Nixon turning on the spigot of U.S. military aid to make sure Israel survived, including the stripping of U.S. squadrons of jets and sending them to Israel, almost overnight. So there is a very real potential that the Russians, Chinese and North Koreans will take a page from history and re-equip Iran."

i just don't see obama doing anything. not a thing.

because russia and the u.n. will tell him to stay out of it.