Witnesses of Fort Hood attack say they heard “Allahu Akbar” before opening fire; AP ponders “motive”

by Infidelesto on November 6, 2009 · Comments

No surprise…this was an act of jihad.  Mujahadis around the world would be proud…

Soldiers who witnessed the shooting rampage at Fort Hood that left 13 people dead reported that the gunman shouted “Allahu Akbar!” — an Arabic phrase for “God is great!” — before opening fire, the base commander said Friday….

Apparently the AP cannot seem to make the connection, or simply refuse to do so out of political correcness

The motive for the shooting wasn’t clear, but Hasan was apparently set to deploy soon and had expressed some anger about the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

hattip: Jawa

Related posts:

  1. Idiot in Chief: “We cannot fully know” motive of Ft. Hood Terrorist
  2. Video: American Imam defends Fort Hood Terror Attack
  3. Allahu akbar…boom
  4. Imam claims he didn’t pressure Fort Hood jihadi Nidal Hassan
  5. Classy: CAIR using Fort Hood attack to raise money
  6. Bush reaction to Fort Hood
  7. US Official Finally Admits Fort Hood was “act of terrorism”
  8. Muslim leader speaks on Fort Hood: Blames attack on “resentment of US Government” and nothing to do with Islam
  9. Fort Hood Hero
  10. Liberal idiots blather on about Fort Hood jihadi, and of course, get it all wrong
Want automatic updates?
4 choices: Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or get daily email updates
  • Just sign the petition: and kick out the POTUS and his pay pals. No $ required to donate.
    No More Muslim Immigration

    You can view this petition at: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/tell-a-friend/58...
  • Ever ponder why the POTUS was not in the room when attack happened? Seems like the so called leaders escape these things for some reason or other, imagine that! Hummmmmmmm?
    GRRRR
  • joesix_pack
    Political Islam is at war against us. This is at the root cause of the warfare that is so common throughout the Islamic world. Getting rid of political Islam will trigger war as has been demonstrated time and again. The choice is clear: Either we go after political Islam, or it will come to us.

    One problem among many is that the population that support political Islam is so large. This makes the war far more dangerous. The sheer size.
  • Freedomlvr
    I call myself freedom lover because I served in the Armed Services of the U S to protect this country from people who would destroy it. Also, I have traveled to many nations in this world and know that the most freedom and opportuntiy in the world is found right here in the U S of A. Now I should allow those enemies of my nation to immigrate freely so that more wackos like this Major can kill Americans? It is because I love the freedom this nation affords me that I want to keep the jihadi killers out. Do you have a test that will tell you which ones of the Muslim immigrants will become jihadi murders and which will be peaceful? Unless you can do that, keep them all out. Will some innocents suffer? Yes. But I did not bring that suffering on a people who kill maim and destroy in the name of their God. My concern is that my children and grandchildren have a free nation to enjoy just as I do.
  • steve franc
    We can keep pretending theyre here to thrive on freedom... free speech free religion free markets .
    It means nothing to them except to use them to apply a sharia like rule, in a stealth manner. I say if these freedoms apply, they should apply to all - thereby giving us all a voice to challenge insanity and subversion, Where was political correctness in the Constitution? I missed that.
  • Freedomlvr
    Most Muslims are loyal to their religion first and country second, if at all. That is why Muslims should not be allowed to immigrate to Europe or the U. S. But our politically correct idiot leaders will continue their idiocy and more Americans will be killed. Do they have to check their brain at the door to become liberals or journalists??
  • psudrozz
    how can you call yourself freedom lover and say that muslims should not be allowed to immigrate?

    i am sorry i have to play devil's advocate, and i respect your opinions. i just see one of the foundations of this country is legal immigration for anyone.

    still, if the US can find cause in individuals of a dangerous nature, throw their asses out.
  • SirWilhelm
    There is nothing in our Constitution that says "immigration for anyone", in fact,the Constitution provides first of all for the security of it's citizens by making the President the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces and making him responsible for enforcing the laws designed to keep us safe, both internally and externally. The Immigration laws passed by Congress include rules for who should be kept out as well as those allowed in. Since Islam has shown, especially since 9/11, that it's members cannot be trusted and tend to be subversive, and a threat to the very freedom we do love, the law should be changed to keep Muslims out. I would like to see all Muslim immigrants thrown out while we're at it. A close eye should be kept on the remaining natural born and naturalized Muslims. It's the price they must pay for being Muslims. Of course, they could always become apostates, although they would not be under the threat of death their "religion" requires when they are the ones in position to make the rules.
  • psudrozz
    i didn't say "immigration of anyone". i said "legal immigration for anyone"-this implies immigration by the rules which you listed above.

    and i still disagree, although another article on this site asks a very good question-if the muslim community loves this country so much, why don't they turn in those that commit these horrible acts before they occur?
  • JEWHAWK
    Muslims are NOT normal people.They don't want to adapt themselves to the local culture, but rather CHANGE it to conform their twisted way of life.

    My grandparents came from Germany about 1916/1920 and adapted easily to Brazilian society,
    even being Jewish in a Catholic country.

    They did NOT try to convert nobody to Judaism, they did NOT issue fatwas against those whom they did not agree with, they did NOT commit "honor killings", they did NOT commit suicide bombings,
    they did NOT kill Brazilian soldiers during a shooting spree in the name of God ...

    The SAME I can say about the hundreds of thousands of Ukranian, Polish, Japanese, Italian, Portuguese and Christian Germans who came to Brazil, who made this country a great place to work, live, love and to be proud of.

    Muslims' agenda is DIFFERENT.Their plans are of SUPREMACY, CONQUEST and DOMINATION.

    One could NEVER compare a CHRISTIAN immigrant from El Salvador, Mexico, France, Italy, Brazil or Portugal to any filthy muslim.

    At first glance, it SEEMS a racist remark, but when we face ourselves with the Mount Everest-sized
    heap of damning evidence against muslims, we could be sure that it is a SELF-DEFENSE attitude in order to protect ourselves and our loved ones.

    It'd be foolish and reckless to allow those scoundrels to kill our sons and daughters only to look good to the politically correct establishment.
















  • Bronwyn
    Why are you puzzled? It is absolutely untrue that our country is based on free immigration for all. We have standards. If you are committed to the violent overthrow of the United States you are our sworn enemy and if we allowed you to become a citizen then we have embraced traitors to our bosom. Every adherent to Islam is required to seek the violent overthrow of the United States; they must not be permitted to come in or to stay.
  • pereality
    "how can you call yourself freedom lover and say that muslims should not be allowed to immigrate?"

    Because there are people in this world that will attack a civilization that believes in peace and freedom. Secondly, just because someone believes in freedom, does not mean that they also have to believe that anyone and everyone should be allowed to immigrate to the U.S.

    The whole "the U.S. is a nation of immigrants" position is useless argument. For one, the same thing can be argued just about any other country, as people there came from somewhere else, and so on, and so forth. Just because people have immigrated to the U.S., doesn't mean that anyone else should have act like they have a sense of ENTITLEMENT to com the U.S. That sense of entitlement is one of the root flaws in their thinking.
  • psudrozz
    given the immediate impact of mass immigrations to the US in the 1800's and 1900's which actively shaped our nation into a world power in a relatively short time, i think i can maintain that the U.S. is a nation of immigrants as a valid argument. and my ancestors didn't come to this nation for entitlement-they came to work their asses off in a chance for something better.

    and i'm sorry, i just don't see a sign that says "no muslims" on the statue of liberty. while i do agree with many of the perspectives on this site, i just cannot see barring legal immigration into this country due to religeous affiliation. because once you start barring people based on religeon, it's not to far to start prohibiting people from this country of different races/cultures.

    and how can a nation call itself "free" if it forbids certain religeous affiliation?
  • SirWilhelm
    Islam is a political organization disguised as a religion. If it was recognized for that reality, it could be banned in the same way the Nazi and Communist parties are. And before you say there was nothing religious about them, consider that the Nazi's symbol was the Swastika, the Twisted Cross, and they used other religious symbols and claims in their propaganda. Communists condemned all religion, which is a religious position by default. The seperation of church and state was an invention of our founding fathers, and it is still hard to seperate the two in reality, but it is necessary for our survival that we make this distinction with Islam.
  • JEWHAWK
    "and i'm sorry, i just don't see a sign that says "no muslims" on the statue of liberty"

    It should.
    Muslims are NOT normal people.
    Muslims are NOT fans of democracy, they want to destroy it and replace it by imposing the Sharia Law.

    Muslims should NOT be permited to INFEST the Western countries as LOCUSTS should be impeded to infest wheat, corn and soy plantations.The result of both PLAGUES are the same.

    I detest muslims.They're TWO-LEGGED CARCINOGENIC CELLS walking around.
  • ww
  • Bronwyn
    Psudrozz you need to think it through. Suppose there were a group of people whose avowed purpose was the overthrow of every nation on earth that rejected their own peculiar legal system. Suppose that legal system legislated the inferiority of every other group on earth except their own. Suppose this group had avowed enemies whose destruction they openly contemplated, say Jews, Christians, Hindus Zoroastrians, homosexuals, etc. Suppose this group announced their firm purpose as they sought entrance to your country. Will you let them in as immigrants?

    No, you would not. Not if you possess any sense at all. Now, suppose this group explains very carefully to you that they hold the legal system that they impose and murder and oppress the above mentioned groups because of their deeply held religious beliefs. Do you suddenly tearfully look at the statue of liberty and let them in? No.

    Come on. Just by calling Islam a religion, are you going to be so easily duped? It is not a religion. It is a ruthless program of world wide domination that attempts to kill and oppress all who differ from its peculiar and hateful views.

    Your ancestors are not relevant unless they were committed to the violent overthrow of the US. Islam is committed to the overthrow of everyone it comes in contact with. Don't you get it?
  • psudrozz
    "Islam is committed to the overthrow of everyone it comes in contact with."

    So was Christianity at one time. Times change.

    I do understand your perspective, I just can't see barring someone legal entry to a country for any historical trend they didn't have a hand in.

    Just my .25
  • SirWilhelm
    A more accurate translation is "Allah is greater", meaning Allah is greater than Jehovah. That's the true nature of the "holy" war between Jews, Christians and Muslims. Allah is trying to establish his superority over Jehovah and His Son by defeating his followers with his slaves, the Muslims. Also, this shows NO Muslim can be trusted. No matter how trustworthy they seem, there is always going to be the possiblity of this kind of betrayal form anyone of them. No wonder they fear the backlash, they deserve it.
blog comments powered by Disqus