Comments on: Chicago Mayor Blames Ft. Hood Jihad Massacre on “America’s Love of Guns”

By: drinking12many

drinking12many — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:39:28 +0000

So what he is saying is that even military people should have their 2nd ammedment rights infringed upon. If people in the military can not be trusted with guns then can the police? I find it funny up until this point Hassan was legally allowed to own a gun as he had yet to commit a crime preventing him from owning any. If we were to start taking guns before a crime was commited it becomes the equivelant of thoughtcrime. Thats what the good mayor wants a land where law abiding citizens are defenseless to those who could care less about the law.

By: drinking12many

drinking12many — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:39:28 +0000

By: SirWilhelm

SirWilhelm — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:41:50 +0000

You're right, they're not illegal here. The Nazi Party was outlawed in Germany, and the Communist Party collapsed in the US, at least on the surface. There is no excommunication in Islam, just the opposite, apostates, anyone that tries to leave Islam, are killed. Another reason to believe there are no moderate Muslims.

By: How Bad Can It Get News #3 « Surreal World

How Bad Can It Get News #3 « Surreal World — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:00:06 +0000

[...] Chicago Mayor Blames Ft. Hood Jihad Massacre on “America’s Love of Guns” This came from Founding Bloggers: [...]

By: libertarianwoman

libertarianwoman — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:46:57 +0000

Unfortunately, Communism, Nazism and Fascism are NOT illegal. I believe there is a representative in Congress right now that is a self-proclaimed member of the Communist party. It's part of the First Amendment. And wasn't he talking about Arabic in the schools? We don't need it taught there. What we need is for the so-called peaceful Muslims to denounce those that even talk about jihad, violence against infidels. Do they have the equivalent of excommunication such as the Catholics? They are the only ones that can bring these people under control. But they don't, which takes away their credibility as well.

By: SirWilhelm

SirWilhelm — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:51:59 +0000

You declare Islam a terrorist politcal organization, which it is, and outlaw it the same way Communism, Nazism, and Fascism are. Teaching Arabic isn't a problem in itself, we taught Russian at the height of the Cold War, you have to know your enemy after all. It's the politcally correct motives behind it that are the problem. And Islam is a political problem, it should be treated that way.

By: SirWilhelm

SirWilhelm — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:45:25 +0000

Good point, many more people die in auto accidents every year, around 50k+, than die by guns. Do we talk about outlawing cars? We do have laws against drinking and driving, it seems the best we can do, but cars are obviously a necessary evil, why should guns be anything less? Guns are a tool, like any other, it's the people that use them that choose good or evil, and only people can make that choice. Liberals fear personal responsibility because they believe they know what's best for everyone else better than they know themselves. Which means they have no respect for the intellect of the “masses”. Which is why they're elitists. Which is why they have armed bodyguards. How many of our representatives in Washington fit this “profile”? It's why they hate profiling so much.

By: stompykitty

stompykitty — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:30:33 +0000

This guy takes the cake!! That is THE most asinine remark I've seen in a long while. It's like he drew it out of a hat of “Alternative things to blame Ft Hood Massacre on”. Holy cheez-moly man…..let's go ahead & blame it on America's love of McDonald's! Makes about as much sense. However, the guy IS a Chicago politician….nuff said.

By: libertarianwoman

libertarianwoman — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:05:36 +0000

“unveils expansion of Arabic language program”????? This is the problem! We now have home grown jihadists, how do we fight that?

By: psudrozz

psudrozz — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:02:35 +0000

so we should blame alcohol and cars when someone drives drunk and kills someone?

what is it about personal responsibility that scares liberals so much?