Obama says 9/11 jihadi could get the death penalty, then waffles

by Kal El on November 22, 2009 · Comments

And what else would you expect, from the islamo-panderer in chief?

Obama suggests 9/11 suspect will get death penalty

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama suggested on Wednesday the self-professed mastermind of the September 11, 2001, attacks would be convicted and put to death, but later said he was not trying to prejudge the trial.

Speaking in television interviews while traveling in Asia, Obama acknowledged he would miss his January 22 deadline to close the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is now held, but said he believed it would be shut next year.

Separately, Attorney General Eric Holder told lawmakers Mohammed and his accused four co-conspirators could be safely tried in New York despite Republican security concerns.

In testimony before Congress, Holder also said the federal government was open to paying for some of the added security costs, which a New York senator said could be upwards of $75 million a year.

Obama defended Holder’s decision on Friday to move the five men from the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba for a trial in a U.S. federal court in New York.

“(What) I think we have to break is this fearful notion that somehow our justice system can’t handle these guys,” Obama said in an interview with NBC News.

Asked if he understood why some people were offended by trying the men in U.S. courts, he replied: “I don’t think it will be offensive at all when he’s convicted and when the death penalty is applied to him.”

He then backtracked, saying, “What I said was people will not be offended if that’s outcome. I’m not prejudging” them.

At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Holder also defended his decision and predicted Mohammed and the others would be convicted. “Failure is not an option. I don’t expect that we will have a contrary result.”

TRYING TO AVOID CIRCUS TRIALS

Many Republicans have argued the terrorism suspects should be tried in military tribunals at Guantanamo Bay because they believe criminal courts are not suited for such trials and they worry that the U.S. trial sites could become targets.

New York Democratic Senator Charles Schumer said initial cost estimates he had seen to secure the trials in lower Manhattan would be $75 million a year plus costs for added security around the city and additional police personnel.

The top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Jeff Sessions, said that the 2001 attacks on New York and Washington were acts of war and therefore the accused should be prosecuted in military courts.

“I believe this decision is dangerous, I believe it’s misguided, I believe it’s unnecessary,” he said. “I think there are clear advantages to trying cases by military commission as opposed to what can become a spectacle of a trial.”

Sessions also questioned whether the Obama administration was returning to a pre-September 11 mind-set which he argued was focused on law enforcement rather than preventing attacks.  Continued…

Related posts:

  1. Obama to resume jihadi trials at Gitmo resort, liberals dismayed
  2. Report: Obama orders KSM terror trial to be moved out of New York?
  3. Iran mulls death penalty for Internet crimes
  4. Journalist faces death penalty for insulting religion of ‘peace’
  5. Iran votes to discuss Death penalty for bloggers
  6. NY: 9-11 trials will cost over 200 Million per year
  7. Iran passes law calling for death penalty for all converts from islam
  8. Judge Rules First Guantanamo War Crimes Trial Can Begin
  9. Bali bombers cower from death penalty, stall with litigation
  10. Bangladeshi muslim editor faces death penalty for moderate views
Want automatic updates?
4 choices: Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or get daily email updates
  • tlwinslow
    Too bad that Atty. Gen. Eric Holder didn't read far enough into the U.S. Constitution to get to Article 1 Sect. 8 that provides for military tribunals for pirates and violators of the laws of nations. Maybe he's trying to enact the Holder Exemption for Obama's coddled Muslims? He should study U.S. history on the Barbary Wars of 1797 and 1801-5 and see how the Founding Fathers handled Muslim terrorists

    http://go.to/islamhistory
  • SirWilhelm
    The meida constantly criticized Bush for his supposed lack of oral skills, but Obama constantly outdoes Bush with the thoughtlessness he displays when he speaks without considering the consequences, or worse, cares less for the consequences. There's no excuse for Obama, who lectured as a Constitutional attorney, to say something like this that prejudices the case he's speaking of. Obviously he immediately realized his mistake and tried to correct it, but the damage is done.

    As for Holder, tlwinslow, I believe he's entirely aware of the Article you point to. I believe he is following the lead, and shares the beliefs of his boss, that the Cosntitution is an inconvenience to their goals, and they will ignore it as long as they can get away with it, and there is little chance the Congress their party controls will call them on it, they sure haven't so far. They are trying to create a government that will be exempt from the Constitution all together, and they appear to be succeeding. The Founding Fathers have surely been turning over in their graves since Obama was sworn in.
blog comments powered by Disqus