Pic of the Day: Google Dhimmitude

by Infidelesto on January 6, 2010 · Comments

Maybe they’re like the 2012 guys and don’t want a Fatwa on their ass?

Want automatic updates?
4 choices: Twitter, Facebook, RSS feed or get daily email updates
  • koranbaconsandwich
    Search on 'mohammed is[space]' my favorite is pig.
  • Solkhar
    LOL, guess lobbying to liberal infested beaurocrats works!

    Mind you, some would say that it is compensation for the over 4,2000 anti-Islam hate sites that have sprung up in the US bible-belt over the last three years, sites that if were in the EU would be closed down under hate and discrimination legislation. Even The Netherlands, which allows the creation of parties with no democracy like Wilder's PVV, Christian fundamentalist parties that wish to ban women from public office and a pro-paedophilia party interestingly will allow that but would not let direct hate-sites.
  • Solkhar
    Correction - 4,200 excuse the fingers they were shaking, it is cold and wet were I am.

    Oh, the figure came from an interview with an FBI domestic terrorism official on Sky News.
  • How do you define an "anti-Islam hate site"?

    A blog that publishes news about Islamic extremism? I bet you would label every singe one of them "anti-Islam hate sites".

    Who "decides" what is hate and what is not?

    It's a lie, Solkhar.
  • Solkhar
    What is a libertard? Someone who does not agree with your ideas? *What is a ultra-right wing redneck, someone who is not a liberal? Same argument there and it does not stick, right?

    Yes, who does decide what is hate, thus I guess for you when you see anti-semetic rantings by Ahmadinijad he has that right since he has not used the bomb on Israel.

    According to the guy from the FBI there are aproximately 4200 websites created over three years in mostly southern baptist regions of the US that are basically provide obviously incorrect information and promoting generalised negative stereotyping of Muslims and Islam in general or for the purpose of "creating hostility" towards them. That was the descripition given. Many have since been closed down by web-providers but many are still existing.

    Thus, they are not websites that are simply trying to raise awareness or discuss the worrying affects of jihadism, radical Muslims and other issues like your blog is doing.

    How much did you bet there John? I just gave my label and I do not consider your blog to be an anti-Islam hate site and you will have noticed that I gave enough respect each and everytime to you and your blog for attempting to "understand".

    Hate
    1 a : intense hostility and aversion usually deriving from fear, anger, or sense of injury b : extreme dislike or antipathy : loathing <had a great hate of hard work>
    2 : an object of hate.
    Hostility
    1 a : deep-seated usually mutual ill will b (1) : hostile action (2) plural : overt acts of warfare : war
    2 : conflict, opposition, or resistance in thought or principle
  • Well I'm glad you don't consider this site a hate site.

    That being said. A Libtard is a term here in America that we use on liberals and leftists who are incapable of discrimination. They invariably side with evil over good, wrong over right, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success. They have noble intentions, but are indoctrinated into this sort of propaganda by our academia, hollywood and mainstream news which liberals own. They take both sides or refuse to take a side, they use emotive thinking.

    e.g.

    Ask a liberal if healthcare is a right and that everyone should have access to it regardless. The emotional response of any average person with good intentions is "Of course I want everyone to have health care". The problem here is that they don't think it through. They play on their initial thoughts and don't understand the freedoms, choices, liberties, property they are giving up in order to achieve this utopia of a perfect society. Communism is exactly that, just put into action. Statism is defined by society collecting so much money from the public and redistributing it based on the interests of the powerful oligarchy. Communism is that in the extreme, enforcing their will even if it includes imprisoning or even killing the opposition.



    American celebrates the individual while Europe and other "Statist" countires celebrate society as a whole. Hence the reason America is the greatest opportunity for ANYONE if they really want to work hard for something, they can have it.

    Unfortunately, we're losing the battle these days. Marxism and Statism is growing faster and stronger than ever and that's why the American people are just recent;y starting to wake up to the problem. Barack Obama is the epitome of the socialist/statist or whatever you want to call it. Anti-American, anti-freedom, more about the collective, turning us into European socialism, etc...

    It all starts from modern day liberalism which leads tosoft tyranny (socialism) which leads to communism and fascism.
  • "some would say that it is compensation for the over 4,2000 anti-Islam hate sites that have sprung up in the US bible-belt over the last three years

    Dude, you are incapable of taking a side on anything aren't you. It's the height of intellectual elitism, thinking you have some supernatural gift being able to "rise above" and see both sides...

    The inability to discriminate from right over wrong will inevitably lead you to side with behaviors that lead to evil over those that lead to good. Multiculturalism is one of those cancers within our society. And by constantly giving the other side's argument (many times making false statements in order to achieve that plurality), you may feel super duper smart and above all the "emotive responses" just to lecture everyone on what both sides' argument is, but I think, a very sad character quality to have.

    I know you don't understand what I mean, and I'm sure I'll get some "higher learning" experience when you respond, but I truly think you don't have the ability to choose right over wrong, I really don't. You only have the ability to explain things, in your mind, in context which sadly falls way way short most of the time.

    You should be outraged by the things on this site, but instead, you explain to all of us, in the elitist way you always represent yourself, the "higher knowledge" of the "elite" that nobody can really understand unless you have several years experience working in international politics.

    Solkhar, you're no better than the rest of us. In fact, you might be too smart.

    "Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them. The Party intellectual knows in which direction his memories must be altered; he therefore knows that he is playing tricks with reality; but by the exercise of doublethink he also satisfies himself that reality is not violated. The process has to be conscious, or it would not be carried out with sufficient precision, but it also has to be unconscious, or it would bring with it a feeling of falsity and hence of guilt."
  • Solkhar
    I am not into elitism, I am experessing my opinions and basing that on my own experiences and how I perceive things - like everyone else does. I certainly take no "sides" and wonder why there has to be any. What I try to endeavour is to show the reality and point out when comments are not based on it. I see no confict or "doublethink" in my comments unless it is a failure of my English grammar which is possible.

    If I have a criticism of you John is that your make simplicity into issues instead of looking at the reasons (history, external and internal factors and causes not to mention the countless other factors) and thus when I point out why things are the way they are (in my opinion) you find it to complex for you to accept. Examples - you see dangerous militant Muslims in the mountains of Afghanistan and you see disruptive, verbally abusive Muslims in Europe and you assume that they are there for the same reason, since they are Muslim then Islam is the common denominator and thus attack it. Rather than complaining about Colonel Sanders" KFC or the SFC recipes or deep frying method that is causing your cholesterol problem - you have abused and condemned the actual chickens.

    I will give credit were credit is due and I will point out the sh*t for the smelly stuff that it is, but I will be damned if I will make myself a hypocrit by generalizing, over-simplifying and falling into some political agenda.
  • I certainly take no "sides" and wonder why there has to be any.

    exactly my point!

    You're incapable of discrimination. You invariably side with evil over good, wrong over right, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success.

    I don't consider you "evil", and I don't consider you incredibly stupid. If you were really stupid, you'd be right more often.
  • jerry
    another reason to use bing!
  • Freedomlvr
    All right. Which one of you Infidels defaced Ahmadinejad's web site? Who ever it was, good work. A high five and a knuckle bump to you. Does CAIR have a web site? Ha.
  • greg-o
    I'll bet its because there are a bunch of muslims working for google. Intel is just as biased and phuked-up in their ways.
blog comments powered by Disqus