Muslim woman wants a revival of institutionalized sexual slavery

by Kal El on June 10, 2011 · View Comments

Do you like this story?

And why wouldn’t she? As long as it is kuffar women, property of muslims it is okay, right? I mean pedophile Muhamhead had sex slaves, so why shouldn’t all muslims?

Muslim Woman Seeks to Revive Institution of Sex-Slavery

Last week witnessed popular Muslim preacher Abu Ishaq al-Huwaini boast about how Islam allows Muslims to buy and sell conquered infidel women, so that “When I want a sex-slave, I go to the market and pick whichever female I desire and buy her.”

This week’s depraved anachronism comes from a Muslim woman—Salwa al-Mutairi, a political activist and former parliamentary candidate for Kuwait’s government, no less: She, too, seeks to “revive the institution of sex-slavery.”

A brief English report appeared over the weekend in the Kuwait Times (nothing, of course, in the MSM):

Muslim men who fear being seduced or tempted into immoral behavior by the beauty of their female servants, or even of those servants “casting spells” on them, would be better to purchase women from an “enslaved maid” agency for sexual purposes. She [Mutairi] suggested that special offices could be set up to provide concubines in the same way as domestic staff recruitment agencies currently provide housemaids. “We want our youth to be protected from adultery,” said al-Mutairi, suggesting that these maids could be brought as prisoners of war in war-stricken nations like Chechnya to be sold on later to devout merchants.

The Arabic news website, Al Arabiya, has the sordid details, including a video of Mutairi addressing this topic. I summarize and translate various excerpts below (note: I am not making any of this up):

The Kuwaiti female activist begins by insisting that “it’s of course true” that “the prophet of Islam legitimized sex-slavery.” She recounts how when she was in Mecca, Islam’s holiest city, she asked various sheikhs and muftis (learned, authoritative Muslims) about the legality of sex-slavery according to Sharia: they all confirmed it to be perfectly legal; Kuwaiti ulema further pointed out that extra “virile” men—Western synonyms include “sex-crazed,” “lecherous,” “perverted”—would do well to purchase sex-slaves to sate their appetites without sinning.

Here’s a particularly interesting excerpt from her taped speech on the rules governing sex-slaves:

A Muslim state must [first] attack a Christian state—sorry, I mean any non-Muslim state—and they [the women, the future sex-slaves] must be captives of the raid. Is this forbidden? Not at all; according to Islam, sex slaves are not at all forbidden. Quite the contrary, the rules regulating sex-slaves differ from those for free women [i.e., Muslim women]: the latter’s body must be covered entirely, except for her face and hands, whereas the sex-slave is kept naked from the bellybutton on up—she is different from the free woman; the free woman has to be married properly to her husband, but the sex-slave—he just buys her and that’s that.

She went on to offer concrete suggestions: “For example, in the Chechnyan war, surely there are female Russian captives. So go and buy those and sell them here in Kuwait; better that than have our men engage in forbidden sexual relations. I don’t see any problem in this, no problem at all.”

Mutairi suggests the enslaved girls be at least 15 years-old.

She further justified the institution of sex-slavery by evoking 8th century caliph, Harun Rashid—a name some may recall from Arabian Nights bedtime stories; a name some may be surprised to discover politically active Muslims modeling their lives after:

“And the greatest example we have is Harun al-Rashid: when he died, he had 2,000 sex slaves—so it’s okay, nothing wrong with it.”

Mutairi’s rationale is ultimately guided by a sense of efficiency, a desire for the good of society: legalizing sex-slaves helps prevent Muslim men from transgressing Allah’s laws (as we have seen, extramarital relations with fellow Muslim women is strictly forbidden, but not with infidel sex-slaves, since they are scarcely considered human). Thus, the institution of sex-slavery provides a convenient, Sharia-compliant way of satiating the libidinous urges of Muslim men.

The Kuwaiti activist’s blunt approach also has universal parallels. For example, in the West, some seek to legalize marijuana, arguing that, since people use it anyway, let it be made compliant with the law. In the Muslim world, we have those who seek to legalize sex-slavery, arguing that, since Muslim men will use women anyway, let it be made compliant with Sharia law.

Such are the inevitable differences between the Western mindset (based on reason and universal rights) and the Sharia mindset (based on the life of a 7th century Arabian caravan-raider and slave-trader).

Mutairi concluded by piously supplicating Allah: “Oh I truly wish this for Kuwait, Allah willing—Oh Lord, Lord, you are bountiful…”

While she waits, Mutairi can take solace in the fact that, if sex-slavery is not institutionalized in Kuwait, it thrives underground throughout the Muslim world, where non-Muslim girls—mostly Christians—are routinely abducted, enslaved, and forced into lives of unspeakable degradation.

After all, just because a practice is not formally institutionalized does not mean that those who deem it their divine right are not practicing it.

Link to source.

Related posts:

  1. Slavery still practiced in muslim Mauritania
  2. Slavery alive and well in muslim countries, as one victim speaks out
  3. Sharia Doctrine and 'Temporary Marriage' aka Sex Slavery
  4. Muslim Asks City for Woman-only Pool Times
  5. Sexual harrassment of foreigners the rule, NOT the exception, in muslim Egypt
  • I said

    This is undoubtedly the most well writen article I’ve read concerning this evil and perverted woman’s mindset which is shared through the Muslim community worldwide.   

  • ANA

    SICK WOMAN, LET HER BE A SEX SLAVE

  • saleem

    she is a lier and is quoting wrong references. i hope people under stand what she is driving at.
    GOD save us from her ideas.

  • Anonymous

    mein kuranmpf is a “wrong reference?”

    surah 4 ayat 24 “Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those (captives and slaves) whom your right hands possess.
    Thus has Allah ordained for you. All others are lawful, provided you
    seek (them in marriage) with Mahr (bridal money given by the husband to
    his wife at the time of marriage) from your property, desiring chastity,
    not committing illegal sexual intercourse, so with those of whom you
    have enjoyed sexual relations, give them their Mahr as prescribed; but
    if after a Mahr is prescribed, you agree mutually (to give more), there
    is no sin on you. Surely, Allah is Ever AllKnowing, AllWise”

    “Ma malakat aymanukum”  ما ملكت أيمانکم Wrong reference?

    Ibn Kathir is “wrong reference?”

    “(This is for him among you who is afraid of being harmed in his religion
    or in his body;) indicates that marrying slave girls, providing one
    satisfies the required conditions, is for those who fear for their
    chastity and find it hard to be patient and refrain from sex.”

    The lifestyle of the “ideal man” is a “wrong reference?”

    surah 33 ayat 21 “Ye have indeed in the Messenger
    of Allah a beautiful pattern (of conduct) for any one whose hope is in
    Allah and the Final Day, and who engages much in the Praise of Allah.”

    Hadiths are “wrong reference?”

    So if mo the putrid, allah the impotent, Ibn Kathir, and hadiths, which this bagheaded bitch referenced are “wrong references” WHAT ARE “right references”?

  • Ontherightpath

    mein kuranmpf is a direct reference to Hitler’s book “Mein Kumpf” its a play on words. The mein kuranmpf is a false interpretation of the quran. You don’t know what your talking about. You should just stop posting on these websites

  • hellosnackbar

    You haven’t the wit to understand anything have you Mr Muddy Path.
    Hitler’s book is called Mein Kampf.(Kampf means struggle).
    The Koranus and Mein Kampf are very similar in the sense that submission to fascist dogma is the whole theme of both these silly rags.
    Submission without question has a common theme in tht both Nazis and Mohammedans must kowtow to the
    contents therefrom.
    Mittlereweile Rightpath lernst du ein Bischen der Deutschesprache!
    Dann verstehst du was los ist!
    Bis dann halt deine Klappe.

  • JEWHAWK

    Salim, would you like to know that I HATE korangutans ? Can you “under stand” that I’m not being a “lier” by telling you this ?

  • JEWHAWK

    I LOATHE pisslam and all its followers.
    Please, interpret this correctly.

  • Anonymous

     Thank you for setting junior jihadi here straight, dear HSB.

  • Anonymous

     Verily, allah is a douchebag and mo is his right hand goon.

    Ye, yea who  believe in the unholy trinity of allah the impotent, mo the molester, and mein kuranmpf shall meet the business end of Mr. Mossberg.

    Is that “correct and proper” translation, JH?

    Or do I need to read it in the original ihateislamopithecaiitroglodytesish?

    Do I need to consult the bronze age bullshi’ite manuel to understand the “proper context?”
    :D

  • JEWHAWK

    Mr.Mossberg is indeed, a worldwide renown Islame’s translator. He’d often do his utmost for not letting any misunderstood and, much less, any “out of context” passages of the koranderthal’s death-worshipping book, the infamous Mein Korampff.

  • JEWHAWK

    Actually, my weapon of choice, the thing who better translates my thoughts regarding how to properly deal with Pisslam is the 155mm howitzer.
    What the koranderthal Orcs truly deserve is to be utterly obliterated by shrapnel.
    Legs, hands, eyeballs, fingers, blood and many burnt copies of the Mein Korampff scattered all over the place.
    I’d display no mercy.

  • Anonymous

     LOL

    You certainly don’t pussy foot around, JH.

    I’m glad we’re on the same team!

    I’ll edit my translation of your statement to “ontheslipperyslope” above.

  • JEWHAWK

    Istambul_Chick, I’d love to read your comments also on FOX NEWS.
    The Kenyan apologizer-in-chief, Sheikh Al-Obumbo, is poised to be re-elected next November. Something must be done to avoid this disaster from happening.

  • Anonymous

     We’re screwed.

    The GOP didn’t give us any decent options.

    I’m hoping someone or some group takes drastic measures to prevent it.

    My brother and I have been plastering our neighborhoods with “How’s that hope and change working out for you, America” stickies.

    But the American public has been razzled and dazzles, I fear.

  • JEWHAWK

    I agree. Romney is gonna be an easy prey to the DNC War Machine.
    It will be McCain – Volume II, I’m afraid.
    Well, things could get better – or worse, depending Romney’s choice for the ticket’s VP.
    Rubio : To please the conservative latino voters.
    Allen West : To conquer and divide the blacks.
    Ricky Martin…errrr, I’m sorry. My bad.

  • SirWilhelm

    It offends me when you say God, when you mean Allah, because I don’t believe Allah is God, or Jehovah, since he disowns Jesus as the Son of God, and claims He is only a “prophet”, and a lesser prophet than Mohammed. Worship Allah, the Greatest Deceiver, if you wish, but don’t try to deceive me by calling him God.

  • Anonymous

     There are very few conservative blacks. They tend to gravitate to the party that initiated the KKK and Jim Crow laws (democrat).You should check out the nasty notes to West, from blacks, on FB or any news article about him.

    I’ve no doubt the black panthers along with NOIers will again be at the voting stations intimidating voters and nothing will be done about it.

    It really doesn’t matter who Romney chooses as VP.

    ALREADY the tv is saturated with “OBAMA got bin laden ads.” And even retarded conservative voters will lap it up.

blog comments powered by Disqus