UN resolution targets free speech, in the name of appeasing muslims

by Kal El on January 19, 2012 · 1 comment

Do you like this story?

Because, seriously, only muslims react with violence whenever someone insults their religion. Funny how that works right? I mean, it’s not like islam claims to be the religion of peace, then has its adherents kill those that say otherwise, right?

Criminalizing Religious Criticism: UN Resolution Threatens Freedom of Speech


A new resolution introduced at the United Nations Human Rights Council has free speech advocates concerned about a potential backlash against religious minority groups. Previously introduced as Resolution 62/154, “Combating defamation of religion,” the piece was originally written to criminalize the criticism of religion. Advocates worried that the resolution would, at best, limit freedom of speech, and at worst, jeopardize religious minorities in countries carrying heavy punishments for blasphemy and apostasy.

Recently the piece has morphed into Resolution 16/18, the goal of which is “Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping, and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against, persons based upon religion or belief.”

But in spite of the seemingly benign language, free speech advocates say there is still cause for concern. According to Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice, in some Islamic countries, particularly those with harsh penalties for apostasy and blasphemy, it often doesn’t take much for religious minorities to incite extremist rage. “Just the building of churches … having a cross outside your door can be inciting violence,” Sekulow says. “So if you let them define these definitions when there is no problem coming from the minority faiths, this is somehow going to ‘green-light’ their suppression,” he explains.

Advocates point to the case of Asia Bibi, a wife and mother who awaits death by hanging in Pakistan after being charged with blasphemy. During a dispute over drinking water, Bibi’s Muslim co-workers accused the Christian woman of insulting the Prophet Mohammed – charges that led to her conviction of blasphemy in a Pakistani court. Religious freedom advocates say that religious minorities often bear the brunt of persecution under blasphemy codes in Islamic countries. In Pakistan, Christians, Hindus and other religious minorities comprise only 3 percent of the population of 180 million.

Those opposing the resolution say that the countries most heavily lobbying for its passage are those with less than ideal track records for freedom of speech or religious diversity. Jordan Sekulow, Director of Policy and International Operations for the American Center for Law and Justice, says that the countries pushing this resolution are countries whose “populations are 90 to 99 percent one single religious group.” He is concerned that religious minorities in these predominately Muslim countries already face some forms of persecution, and that the passage of this resolution might serve to increase persecution against minority groups. “What is the problem here with the 1 percent speaking out and why is that such an issue that needs to be handled at the international level?” he asks.

The Organization of the Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is backing the resolution. Frank Gaffney, president of the American Center for Security Policy, questions the group’s goals for the resolution, accusing the group of attempting to promote Sharia, Islamic law, through the passage of the resolution. “It is 57 states and Palestine that have come together to promote what is fundamentally the agenda that is known as Sharia,” he says.

Page 1  Page 2

Related posts:

  1. U.N. Anti-Blasphemy Resolution Curtails Free Speech, Critics Say
  2. Muslims pushing UN to ban free speech that mocks islam
  3. US, Europeans say Islamic countries want to limit free speech at the UN
  4. OIC muslims get TV crew kicked out of UN debate on human rights, free speech
  5. Detroit area muslims trying to stifle free speech over alleged defamation of "prophet" Muhammad
  • CMartel

    What really bothers me about this is the fact that so many people fail to see what the muslims are up to with this resolution.  This is all about suppression of free speech when it comes to criticizing the moon god’s rantings.  Let’s look at the stated objective”
    “Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping, and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against, persons based upon religion or belief.”
    Intolerance:  Really?  Can anyone name a cult (call it religion if you must) that is more intolerant that islam?  Maybe the Copts in Egypt can help with this one.  Riots over a cartoon also come to mind.  How about the treatment Christians receive in Iraq?
    Negative stereotyping and stigmatization:  Why are all nonbelievers Kafirs and infidels?
    Incitement to violence:  Practiced every day in most mosques throughout the world.    To quote their Quran: (sig) “Slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them captive, and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush. (Qur’an 9:5).
    Violence against persons based upon religion or belief:  Maybe we could ask David Pearl’s widow her views on this.
    Now I don’t really give a rodent’s ass about anything the UN says anyway.  They are truly a joke.  But it does bother me that so many people in the West have no idea of what these fanatics are all about.