Infidels Are Cool

Hahahahaha it’s not enough that they blow themselves up, decapitate infidels and fly planes into buildings. Now they are protesting a mere question that they deem derogatory towards the pedophile terrorist muhammad. I guess the terrible truth of the history of islam is just too much.

The University of Ranchi Thursday hurriedly cancelled its post-graduation history paper after thousands of Muslims took to the streets protesting against a reference to Prophet Mohammed they said was derogatory.

‘A five-member committee has been constituted (to probe) the question paper. The examination has been cancelled,’ Vice Chancellor A.H. Khan announced, shortly after his meeting with Chief Minister Madhu Koda.

The question in the history paper referred to Prophet Mohammed’s life. The examination took place Wednesday.

On Thursday, Muslim organisations organised a march and ransacked the university office to protest against the offending question. The police used force to control the mob.

The university then held an emergency meeting of its top officials.

Chief Minister Koda said: ‘We have asked the vice chancellor to probe the matter and take suitable action against the person who prepared the question. We appeal to people to maintain calm.’

I hope they don’t blow up the school.

Courtesy of Bombay News

Posted by Rudy under Daily Jihad, History

That’s right, JEWISH refugees. The Jews who were run out of Arab countries, by those tolerant peaceful muslims, after the UN created (or rather, GAVE BACK WHAT WAS RIGHTFULLY THEIRS TO BEGIN WITH) Israel in 1948. All the media ever harps on about is the Arabs who left Israel (which they previously invaded and occupied illegally anyway), most due to the promise of the other Arab countries that they would come in, and sweep the Jews into the Mediterranean. Not many are aware of the historical fact that there were at least 1 Million Jews in the Middle East. Today there are fewer than 10000.

Yet people (including retards like the traitor Jimmy Carter) insist that Israel must give back land they won in 1967, in a war Arabs started, and promptly lost, due to Jewish Military Superiority (I am guessing it’s because Jews don’t blow themselves up, thus guaranteeing they can return to report on the goings on at the sites of battle, but I could be wrong.)

Congress Passes First Ever Resolution on Jewish Refugees from Arab Countries
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
WASHINGTON, DC (April 1, 2008) - In what may be the beginning of a dramatic shift in United States policy, the U.S. Congress passed House Resolution 185, which grants first-time-ever recognition to Jewish refugees from Arab countries.

Prior to the adoption of H.Res.185, all Resolutions on Middle East refugees referred only to Palestinians. This Resolution affirms that the U.S. government will now recognize that all victims of the Arab-Israeli conflict must be treated equally. It further urges that the President and U.S. officials participating in Middle East discussions to ensure that any reference to Palestinian refugees must: “also include a similarly explicit reference to the resolution of the issue of Jewish refugees from Arab countries.”

Good luck getting equal treatment for the Jewish people, from Arab countries. Considering they treat muslims from non Arab countries as second class citizens (I know because I LIVE in a muslim country at the moment), and non-muslims even worse. About the only exceptions to that are the United Arab Emirates, and maybe you could count Lebanon, if it survives the current political crisis it is mired in. Or of you happen to be a liberal, mentally handicapped celebretard from Hollywood (Sean Penn/Danny Glover/Rosey O’Donnell, that type), then they roll out the red propaganda pamphlet- Oops!! I mean carpet.

Rep. Joseph Crowley said, “The world needs to understand that it is not just the Arabs and it’s not just the Palestinians in the Middle East, but also Jewish people who themselves were dispossessed of their possessions and their homes, and were victims of terrorist acts. These are people who lived in Middle Eastern communities not for decades, but for thousands of years.” Rep. Crowley added that the Resolution will, “bring light upon an issue that has been swept under the carpet.”

“Discussions of Middle Eastern refugees invariably focus exclusively-and shortsightedly-on the plight of those of Palestinian descent,” said Rep. Ros-Lehtinen. “Far fewer people are aware of the injustice faced by Jewish refugees from Arab lands and Iran. Many Jews saw their communities, which had existed vibrantly for centuries systematically dismantled. They lost their resources, their homes, and their heritage sites, fleeing in the face of persecution, pogroms, revolutions and brutal dictatorships.”

Rep. Mike Ferguson said that there was very strong bi-partisan support for this issue which recognizes, “the plight of hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees who were displaced from countries in the Middle East, Northern Africa and all around the Persian Gulf.” Congressmen Ferguson acknowledged that the U.N. has never recognized Jewish refugees, and that this,”is completely unacceptable and long over due, and this is one of the things this Resolution seeks to address.”

Wow, Congressmen on both sides of the aisles showed some guts on this. I must admit I am impressed that our politicians are able to put partisan politics aside and get something productive done.

I wonder how the arab countries that perpetrated these heinous acts will react to this.

Posted by Rudy under History, Islam revealed, Israel

Click image to enlarge

It’s vital to understand the underlining theology of Islam. The following is a re-post from last year, but since there are hundreds of new readers here at IAC, I’m re-posting this with more reference links this time.

Muslims have been dreaming about a Caliphate that can unite the entire Muslim world and rule with strict Islamic code ever since the death of Muhammed. There have been coups, countercoups and civil wars because of disagreements over wether or not to install the Caliph.

The dream of a caliphate is what is responsible for the Shia-Sunni split. Several Caliphates existed over time until 1924 when Mustafa Kamal Ataturk abolished the Ottoman Caliphate and established the secular Turkish Republic.

Al-Qaeda has clearly stated that the re-establishing the Caliphate is one of its primary objectives. Although Al-Qaeda has taken the violent path to realize their dream of the massive Islamic empire, there are many Islamic groups all across the world that use politics to gain influence; Tanzeem-al-Islami and Hizb ut-Tahrir to name a few.

What exactly is a Caliphate?

A caliphate is the Islamic form of government representing the political unity and leadership of the Muslim world. The head of state (Caliph) has a position based on the notion of a successor to Muhammad’s political authority. It is a dream that has never been realized by Muslims and it will never be.

There will always be Muslims who dream about this empire and on the other hand the power-hungry leaders will prevent any movement that could dissolve their nation-state. Therefore, Muslims are stuck in an eternal conflict between Islamists and nationalists.

What are the goals of this Caliphate?

Besides uniting the Muslims, the goal is to arrange a massive army and call for Jihad against infidel states for the expansion of the Caliphate. Various caliphates have used this strategy to expand their states. The rapid Islamic expansion during the reign of the Caliphs is nothing but staggering.

The reason behind that is millions of eager men willingly joining the fight with the Infidels bacause they believe that Allah will reward them heftily if they die. There has never been a shortage of recruits in the army. This is the same reason there is no shortage of suicide bombers today.

The ultimate goal of the Caliphate would be to bring every square inch of this planet under Islam and convert/subdue all remaining Infidels.

Who are behind this movement?

Various groups around the world are actively advocating the creation of the Caliphate. Surprisingly, the most vocal of these groups, Hizb ut-Tahrir, is based in the UK and other countries in Western Europe and Australia. Just last year, thousands of Muslims gathered in a Khilafat conference to show support for the future Caliphate in Jakarta, Indonesia. The growing support for this empire all over the world is evident.

So what does the future hold? A massive Islamic empire where outspoken voices, homosexuals and other “immoral” people will executed on a regular basis? A fascist empire expanding itself bit-by-bit through demographic conquest, like we’re seeing in modern day Europe? The West having to constantly defend itself from Islamic aggression?

If we don’t wake up to this threat, the future looks gloomy.

Posted by Infidelesto under History, Infidels, Islam revealed, Politics

This just goes to show you what happens when you stop teaching history in your public schools system.

What’s the result?  A retarded generation of useless idiots and un-educated immigrants.

Yahoo News - Britons are losing their grip on reality, according to a poll out Monday which showed that nearly a quarter think Winston Churchill was a myth while the majority reckon Sherlock Holmes was real.

The survey found that 47 percent thought the 12th century English king Richard the Lionheart was a myth.

And 23 percent thought prime minister Churchill was made up. The same percentage thought Crimean War nurse Florence Nightingale did not actually exist.

Three percent thought Charles Dickens, one of Britain’s most famous writers, is a work of fiction himself.

Indian political leader Mahatma Gandhi and Battle of Waterloo victor the Duke of Wellington also appeared in the top 10 of people thought to be myths.

Posted by Infidelesto under History

I just read a fantastic article that all of you should read.

Those who counsel us not to provoke Iran forget the lessons of history.  Churchill didn’t cause World War II; the appeasers of Nazi Germany did.  And peace is an event, not a “process.”

It’s sad when a major newspaper suggests we should fear Vice President Dick Cheney more than Iran’s loony leader, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. But that’s what the Los Angeles Times did in a weekend editorial.

It opined that Cheney’s “desire to bomb Iranian nuclear sites and Revolutionary Guard targets” was “backfiring, causing it to escalate its anti-American activities instead of backing off.” Besides, we are told, the earliest Iran could threaten us with nuclear bombs and intercontinental missiles is 2015.

So we should just press our snooze button?

Stop the presses: Iran already is killing Americans with advanced explosives smuggled to foreign jihadists in Iraq. It is the creator, banker and armory for Hezbollah, which killed 241 Americans in their Beirut barracks in 1983.

It is Hezbollah that provoked a war with Israel, used Lebanon as a human shield and is working as we speak to destabilize and destroy that multicultural democracy and replace it with an Islamofascist theocracy modeled on Ahmadinejad’s Iran.

This is all Cheney’s fault?

Ahmadinejad’s threat to wipe Israel off the map is not just a misunderstanding between well-intentioned diplomats. It’s a threat — no, a promise — as real and ominous as the blueprint for hell on Earth that Hitler drew up in his warning that no one took seriously, “Mein Kampf.”

The fact is that soon, earlier than 2015, an Iranian freighter in international waters off, say, California, could launch a nuclear-armed Scud over the American heartland. The warhead would detonate high in the night sky, unleashing an electromagnetic pulse frying the Times’ presses and sending the U.S. economy back 100 years. The war on terror would be over, and we would have lost.

Don’t stop now…Read the rest 

Posted by Infidelesto under History, Iran

Norman Podhoretz, author of many books including his latest, World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism, speaks with the managing editor of National Revie, Jay Nordlinger on January 10th, 2008.

This clip is short and to the point with regards to the war on Islamofascism and the Bush legacy. via Atlas

Although I agree with Podhoretz that Bush will eventually be seen as the man who led the country on the path to defending America against terrorists, I tend to disagree with his understanding of the threat and his overall handling of the war on terror during his Presidency.

George W. Bush did not have a choice but to defend America after 9/11. He had to do it. The sad reality is that he could not recognize the true Islamic threat to the West. He saw the 19 hijackers as thuggish criminals who radicalized the great “religion of peace”. He saw Saddam Hussein as another threat to world peace (he was rightly correct), as well as the Taliban in Afghanistan who were harboring Al Qaeda terrorists and training them. He dealt with them accordingly but then the pressure of politics stifled him in his efforts. We have since done nothing to find Bin Laden.

We’ve done nothing in pressuring Pakistan to give him up, or to let us go in after him. We’ve done nothing to combat the Islamization of Europe, and we’ve done nothing to stop Islamic immigrants from pouring into this country by staggering numbers.

So much for “your with us, or against us”.

Where Bush went wrong is when he made this a war against “thugs” who used Islam as a cover. What he failed to realize is that these “thugs” actually do believe what they say. They believe in every piece of fundamental Islam that there is. They believe in following Mohammed literally and literally following the Koran and Hadiths.

What can be said about thousands dying all around the world in the name of Islam every year? It’s not “thugs” Mr. President. It’s evil, fundamental Islam that is being practiced all over the world today. In America it’s being fought through the courts and through our legal system. (CAIR, ACLU, DOJ)

Bush has never recognized the Islamization of Europe. Nor has he recognized the fundamental Islamic threat that we are facing today and that our children will face in generations to come if nothing is done about it.

George Bush set us on a path to defend America, not to fight Islamic extremism.

Posted by Infidelesto under History, War on Terror

A redux of Reagan’s famous speech in 1964 applied to the war we face today against Islamic terrorism and political Islamic infiltration into Western society. This speech is a great example of why Reagan was one of the greatest leaders in American history.

The speech gave me chills.

Read the full text here.

via Fortress Australia

Alexander Hamilton said, “A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one.” Let’s set the record straight. There is no argument over the choice between peace and war, but there is only one guaranteed way you can have peace–and you can have it in the next second–surrender.

If nothing in life is worth dying for, when did this begin–just in the face of this enemy? Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard ’round the world? The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn’t die in vain. Where, then, is the road to peace? Well, it’s a simple answer after all.

You and I have the courage to say to our enemies, “There is a price we will not pay.” There is a point beyond which they must not advance. This is the meaning in the phrase of Barry Goldwater’s “peace through strength.” Winston Churchill said that “the destiny of man is not measured by material computation. When great forces are on the move in the world, we learn we are spirits–not animals.” And he said, “There is something going on in time and space, and beyond time and space, which, whether we like it or not, spells duty.”

You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on Earth, or we will sentence them to take the last step into a thousand years of darkness.”

Posted by Infidelesto under History, War on Terror

Random teens interviewed on the street being asked “what does it mean to be an American?”.

The responses are appalling, although I don’t just lay the blame on the public school system. It’s also the parents teaching their children this “What have you done for me lately” type attitude that enables these kids to think that don’t owe anything to America.

Does this reflect the irresponsibility of liberal parents who “claim” they support America, yet don’t promote American values in the home? Seeing the reaction of these teens shows how un-involved the parents are in these kids lives when it comes to being an American. It’s almost “un-cool” or “nerdy” or “lame” to know what it means to be an American.

Watch this short video…

Posted by Infidelesto under Enemy Within, History

If we vote Hillary Clinton into the White House, this is the road we will be going down. PLEASE, PLEASE pay attention to the ideology of Clinton. Gun control, nationalized Health care, more taxes, redistribution of wealth, bigger government. All these things Hillary wants, but do you?

Why does Socialism suck? Here’s just a few reasons…

1. It’s a system of authoritarian political control
2. It’s anti-freedom
3. It’s one step away from communism
4. Promotes laziness
5. You own NOTHING while the government owns EVERYTHING
6. It lets the government tell me what I can and can’t do with my money
7. Destroys free markets
8. It’s tyrannical
9. It’s detrimental to individual liberty
10. It gives losers/drug addicts/poor/homeless people a free pass
11. Does not reward hard working individuals
12. Does not define man as “created equally” but instead “deserves everything equally”
13. Gives the common man no reason to excel, thrive, succeed at anything.
14. Nazi Germany/Stalin/Ottoman Empire/China/North Korea/Cuba..need I say more?
15. If it’s so great, why do Canadians, Cubans, and Europeans flock to America when they need immediate specialized health care? ….. Cause when they need help, they’re told to “Get in line!”

Hillary Clinton is a SOCIALIST. She wants to tax you more, so she can give it back to the “victims” and the “poor” and the “minorities” and the “less fortunate”. This ideology goes directly against what this country was originally founded upon and why we thrived faster than any country in the world in only 200 years. We are free, we take care of our own and we do it the way WE want to do it. We own guns, we keep our own money, we invest, hire, and spend, and ultimately grow exponentially. Capitalism is the greatest thing that could have happened to a young United States 200 years ago. It brought us to the status we have today in this world. A military and economic superpower

Great idea***How bout we keep more of our own money, so we can spend more, hire more, create more, develop more, and let the economy thrive more and more and more.

from socialismsucks.net

Anytime you give to government the responsibility and authority to provide government-made jobs, old-age financial security, “free” health care, and “free” education and indoctrination of children, it will control the lives of the people who live under its jurisdiction, and individual liberty and freedom of choice are sacrificed.

Sure, security is important — but anyone can find security from a prison warden. But, despite socialist promises, bureaucratic programs of the political state cannot guarantee security anyway. Instead the socialist state uses its coercive powers to seize the wealth and properties of those who have earned financial security by their own hands. Socialism does not help poor people; rather, socialism makes people poor so that they have to become dependent on the socialist state and therefore beholden to those in charge of the government.

Socialism is the ultimate exploitative monopoly. No competitors (peaceful market alternatives) are allowed. All major industries, including food, banking, transportation, communication, health care, education, and insurance are owned and operated as state monopolies.

Posted by Infidelesto under History, Politics

There are people who you don’t hear about that could be nominees next year for the Nobel Prize.

Well written article from the Wall Street Journal:

In Olso Friday, the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize was:

• not awarded to the Burmese monks whose defiance against, and brutalization at the hands of, the country’s military junta in recent weeks captured the attention of the Free World.
• The prize was also not awarded to Morgan Tsvangirai, Arthur Mutambara and other Zimbabwe opposition leaders who were arrested and in some cases beaten by police earlier this year while protesting peacefully against dictator Robert Mugabe.
• Or to Father Nguyen Van Ly, a Catholic priest in Vietnam arrested this year and sentenced to eight years in prison for helping the pro-democracy group Block 8406.
• Or to Wajeha al-Huwaider and Fawzia al-Uyyouni, co-founders of the League of Demanders of Women’s Right to Drive Cars in Saudi Arabia, who are waging a modest struggle with grand ambitions to secure basic rights for women in that Muslim country.
• Or to Colombian President Àlvaro Uribe, who has fought tirelessly to end the violence wrought by left-wing terrorists and drug lords in his country.
• Or to Garry Kasparov and the several hundred Russians who were arrested in April, and are continually harassed, for resisting President Vladimir Putin’s slide toward authoritarian rule.
• Or to the people of Iraq, who bravely work to rebuild and reunite their country amid constant threats to themselves and their families from terrorists who deliberately target civilians.
• Or to Presidents Viktor Yushchenko and Mikheil Saakashvili who, despite the efforts of the Kremlin to undermine their young states, stayed true to the spirit of the peaceful “color” revolutions they led in Ukraine and Georgia and showed that democracy can put down deep roots in Russia’s backyard.
• Or to Britain’s Tony Blair, Ireland’s Bertie Ahern and the voters of Northern Ireland, who in March were able to set aside decades of hatred to establish joint Catholic-Protestant rule in Northern Ireland.
• Or to thousands of Chinese bloggers who run the risk of arrest by trying to bring uncensored information to their countrymen.
• Or to scholar and activist Saad Eddin Ibrahim, jailed presidential candidate Ayman Nour and other democracy campaigners in Egypt.
• Or, posthumously, to [Lebanese] lawmakers Walid Eido, Pierre Gemayel, Antoine Ghanem, Rafik Hariri, George Hawi and Gibran Tueni; journalist Samir Kassir; and other Lebanese citizens who’ve been assassinated since 2005 for their efforts to free their country from Syrian control.
• Or to the Reverend Phillip Buck; Pastor Chun Ki Won and his organization, Durihana; Tim Peters and his Helping Hands Korea; and Liberty in North Korea, who help North Korean refugees escape to safety in free nations.

These men and women put their own lives and livelihoods at risk by working to rid the world of violence and oppression. Let us hope they survive the coming year so that the Nobel Prize Committee might consider them for the 2008 award.

Posted by Infidelesto under History, Infidels